I think the optimal solution would be a world where there are many smaller countries with different forms of government to choose from and moving from one country to another is much simpler than it is now. A United States with less centralized power would achieve many of the same benefits.
I would start with world history -- first a book that covers the last few millennia, then specific books on significant events. Next would be a few of Karen Armstrong's books on religion; books such as the New Testament might prove difficult to understand without proper background.
The Princeton Companion to Mathematics would probably be a good starting point for math. I'm not aware of any great texts that provide the same level of broad introduction to science.
I find this article to be incredibly insightful, even at 70 years old. It also contains many choice quotes.
"If we wanted to give our convenient inquiring friend, the Man from Mars, an idea of the best in human culture, we would hardly hand him a set of school texts and syllabi. Why should we do it with Johnnie and Susie?"
"This shows a worrisome lack of basic business knowledge."
"The manager of your local McDonald’s is smarter than the AIG executives."
These types of remarks seem common when discussing this and similar situations related to the current economic situation. Perhaps the intentions of these executives was not to save the company, but to take care of themselves. I don't see this as stupidity. Greedy and unethical? Most definitely. These people are not stupid.
I believe this to be part of a larger problem: many developers and organizations seem unaware of best practices (and when to disregard them) that have existed for decades.
This type of experiment was done by the Peopleware authors. They are the source of many of the productivity numbers you see quoted for software developers.