HN user

anthony_r

531 karma
Posts3
Comments145
View on HN

Which is rather likely, because why else would big tech companies push this if it didn't benefit them in some way?

They switched to this internally a long time ago which basically eliminated phishing attacks against employees. There are security teams inside those megacorps that have a general objective of reducing the number of account takeovers, and non trivial resources to accomplish that. Not everything is a conspiracy.

Also, I am sure you will be able to stick to just passwords for a pretty long time while the world moves on to cryptographic authentication. I'm not being sarcastic here.

It's literally the opposite. You "must" have a cryptographic device (a dongle) that is only doing that one thing, authentication. Doesn't have a built in radio (unless for NFC, if you want it), doesn't have any microphone or camera, doesn't store any data beyond what's needed to authenticate, doesn't communicate except to authenticate - bi-directionally, so phishing is no longer a thing, or at least it's a lot harder.

It's very hard to make a privacy case against FIDO. Practically speaking it's one of the best things that happened to privacy&security since the invention of asymmetric cryptography. The deployment of this tech reduces phishing effectiveness to near zero, or in many cases literally zero.

This.

I don't understand how more people are not catching up to this simple fact that central bank "digital currencies" are nothing more than a by-pass of distributed private banking (brick and mortar + online banks). It's just moving more levers closer to central authorities.

Half-joking, but yeah. "Managing the board of directors" of course means keeping the board happy, which is done by what ansible wrote. Not just directly trying to talk them out of firing the CEO.

The main job of the CEO is to manage the board of directors (i.e. the shareholders). And the main job of the board of directors is to decide when to fire the CEO.

This is exactly what YouTube does already. In fact I see no reason why Twitter couldn't spill ad money to the content (tweet) creators within the next year or two, creating a similar ecosystem. Maybe the value attributable to individual creators would be too small? Videos are quite a bit bigger than tweets (in terms of what matters most, the eyeball time), after all.

I'm talking about having a compiler which could produce more optimal code in any given case, or most given cases

Funny coincidence, that's exactly what the vast majority of compiler code is for, with tens (or hundreds) of thousands of man-years of work spent on that.

Yeah you could optimize GCC to work really well for those problems, there's a great ROI for the "write something trivial really quickly into /dev/null" class of problems.

Let us know how this goes if you embark on this adventure.

You can create an operating system that just displays a static image within milliseconds yourself (shouldn't take you more than a few weeks), it would work even when compiled at -O0.

This is a very specific problem that lends itself to some fantastically cpu-friendly optimizations. Doing a single hash-map lookup here on the hot path would kill performance, and let's not even get started on any serious I/O (disk or network) as that would be multiple orders of magnitude slower. Not many problems are just "cat something extremely predictable into /dev/null".

This is cool. But what I usually do is replace x/y with x/(y+5), and hope for the best :). The 5 can be replaced by 3 or 50, depending on what I'm dealing with.

(in less important areas than sorting things by ratings to directly rank things for users; mentally bookmarked this idea for the next time I need something better, as this clearly looks better)

Indeed. People do not realize just how advanced the reliability infrastructure of those services is. Things like diesel power generators have been baked into cloud datacenters for what, a decade now? Probably longer. Show me your alternative power source when the power goes out (and power does disappear, everywhere, eventually).

FYI, normal TIPS have the fixed rate well below zero (which makes the total yield add up to close to where the fixed rates bonds trade at, around 1-2%). These retail instruments are kind of no brainers if their fixed rate is artificially not allowed to drop below zero.

Win % is a really useless metric in this business, try computing win % for something like long vol strategies (for example things like what Taleb did back in the day), it might come out to 5% or lower and still make money. And because every trade has a counterparty there's plenty of strategies that win 95% or more of the time but eventually lead to ruin. Returns pretty much never have a symmetric distribution.

Computing win % is akin to measuring software quality in terms of number of lines of code - only someone who has no first-hand experience would ever attempt to do that.

Gitlab S-1 5 years ago

So what? Most, or at least a lot of, Web documents are pretty much static, but they don't load nearly as fast.

(static, except for the tracking scripts and ads :))