andromaton

impressed at the look (not the geometry) of 3.6 lol at flash-lite could not find your posts about them

Extremely useful

A lower key Putnam moment

Self-replication requires a minimum amount of information plus machinery. Consciousness may have a similar threshold: below some level of self-modeling, nothing; above it, degrees.

Now includes multi-second llm latencies

Since yesterday.

Claude FM: heartfelt Gemini: psycho Grok: incompetent OpenAI: by the book

If priced like other Anthropic models, Mythos will make vulnerability discovery a lot more accessible.

The author compares it to AISLE, ZeroPath, and OpenAI’s Codex Security. AISLE and ZeroPath are much more expensive. OpenAI’s Codex Security is gated.

Most people don't care about the first two and don't complain about the latter's policy because they are all specialized models and/or harnesses.

Mythos will be available to all.

Dave Barry also insists he is not dead.

https://davebarry.substack.com/p/death-by-ai

It seems it's quite exhausting.

Also too many lands and hits.

Related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838508#47839757

The ux of copilot driving Claude beats Claude Code handily.

I never understood the low visibility.

Expensive ram is annoying. I don't look forward to expensive ai.

- New sign-ups paused for Copilot Pro, Pro+, and Student plans.

- Individual plan limits tightened.

- Opus models removed from Pro plan.

A comment from someone who knows or knew the author or was part of the project sharing details that makes readers feel like they've just been handed backstage passes.

A highly voted comment that seems insightful if you don't know the domain but amateurish if you do.

A comment noting the article is from YYYY and asking if the mods can add (YYYY) to the title.

A comment explaining that this has long been a solved problem in some other language or domain

A commenter pointing out that the article is implicitly US-centric

A comment noting that the submitter has posted this exact link multiple times in the last six months.

A post agreeing, adding a personal anecdote about a gentle nudge received years ago that the commenter still thinks about.

A post thanking dang for his tireless moderation work.

A post by dang about related posts:

A Technical Blog Post by a Big Name Expert - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5326511 - March 2013 (189 comments)

A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43219556 - Feb 2025 (112 comments)

A Hacker News thread where every comment describes itself - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38451203 - Nov 2023 (74 comments)

A request for others to add to the list.

Indeed, some examples:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12340348 Neural network spotted deep inside Samsung's Galaxy S7 silicon brain (2016)

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/831066 Towards a high performance neural branch predictor (1999)

Tbh I'm surprised so much guidance.

Elijah Sandiford at Linus Tech Tips asking Linus Torvalds what happens to Linux if Linus dies. Recorded around September 2025. Aired in November. Plan made in the 2025 Maintainers Summit. Great episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfv0V1SxbNA&t=1860s

Probably the key to eventual clarity is at PJRC's forum. PJRC makes Teensy. Imho it's a great product, and the owner, Paul Stoffregen, a great engineer and person from my experience using their products.

https://forum.pjrc.com/index.php?threads/open-source-teensy-...

My summary:

1. SparkFun and Adafruit are in conflict 2. SparkFun manufactures Teensy under license from PJRC 3. SparkFun cuts off Adafruit as a reseller 4. Adafruit can no longer sell Teensy 5. Adafruit posts on PJRC forum announcing an open-source Teensy competitor 6. Paul posts that it's outrageous in terms of etiquette that they're announcing a competitor on his forum. Adafruit's own forum only allows discussion of Adafruit products.

He's allowing it despite mixed feelings.

Except Paul.

Coined by Andrej Karpathy

Hug of death https://archive.ph/BSh1l

Almost none of the domain knowledge came from Claude. This is something I did by hand 40+ years ago (an assembler and a disassemble/debugger, which is in parts similar to the emulator)

This time it was almost as fun : 1/8 of the mental effort per line, x 8 the speed.