HN user

amencarini

33 karma

Software Engineer in London

http://amencarini.com

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/amencarini; my proof: https://keybase.io/amencarini/sigs/cOgTgPHshWN34QkolhCmxUbFugZCM6guz8cooHxCpvA ]

Posts1
Comments6
View on HN

This typeclasses discussion reminds me a lot of complaints about Go's lack of generics. Even without this "glaring shortcoming" Go became the de facto winner in the ops space, by staying a simple language with a smaller learning surface. Elm could be walking down the same route.

Personally I find composability under The Elm Architecture more of an issue than pure language abstractions.

We are talking about a children's book, I don't think a reader of this book will have to maintain large codebases for a job anytime soon.

Incidentally, Ruby is great for beginners thanks to its expressiveness.