I think this kind of dilemma is with everyone who is attending professional events. I am wondering what are the parameters you all think about when you make decision about attending an event. Would love to see some pointers here.
HN user
amarjeet
Clojure Developer; Previously, in Tech-Product role at Practo & Exotel and Product/BD role at Claro Energy. I'm available @amarjeet000
Thats true. Hopefully EventzIO will solve this problem. All Technology / Startups / Business Conferences in our pocket :)
Can't really comment on America's obsession, but my business and real-life problem solving sense has definitely been empowered by the subjects I pursued in humanities & social sciences domain - rural development, organizational behavior, psychology, economics - apart from my Engineering major. I believe that technology is the backbone when it comes to large scale mobilization of a solution to a problem, but we do need the right perspectives to figure out the solution first.
This will give a pinch to many startups that are coming up with various on-demand service models. In India, there are already many startups around such a concept, but delivery experience is still below average.
JSFM is a JavaScript framework (https://github.com/anoopchaurasia/jsfm) that enables a developer to write codes in Java style architecture - the way key features in Java behave, such as Inheritance, Abstraction, Polymorphism, Encapsulation, Constant, & Static. ECMAScript 6 is also coming up with similar feature set that have already been implemented in JSFM.
I follow this process for most of tech/product/analyst type roles. Specifically, in the case of tech, to me, it really depends upon the level of coding exposure a candidate has. If he/she is a fresher then I would prefer some real-time exercise (white-board/phone/skype exercises) - it helps me get the idea of a person's thought process. I don't look for right answers in that exercise. If the candidate has some code exposure, I prefer to dive deep into his previous work and figure out how he executed the projects. In both the cases I am trying to asses a candidate's approach to execute something. I also try to figure out the candidate's ability to pickup new things and start executing them quickly. This is measure of a candidate's potential. I assign similar weightage to 'Potential' as to 'Past Work History'.
The slides have summarized key pointers nicely. Kind of reminds the focus on the initial steps while launching a mobile product.
Look interesting as I explored. Any specific objective other than the gaming side of it?
IMO, Decentralized Decision Making is one of the fundamental characteristics of a flat organizational structure. Nowadays, at many places, 'flat structure' is being wrongly understood as 'easily approachable management'. However, such companies don't understand and don't conduct decentralized form of decision making. I would not prefer to go after literal meaning of the word 'flat', but at my organization, if I am able to conduct decentralized form of decision making in an effective manner, I would be happy to call it a 'flat organization'.
My interpretation is that the data count for the proposed sites would not be included in the internet plan that a consumer might have taken. It might have some impact on internet pack pricing, but competition should be able to correct it. I don't see any hit on the net neutrality; as of now, it simply appears like a freemium model.
“Content Matters, Not the Source”. This is the fundamental philosophy of this initiative. This initiative is a result of my observation on two points: 1) People judge a writeup based on the author’s professional or personal background, and 2) Similar or better content of an ordinary individual or organization are ignored. Based on above two point arguments, I decided to run this experiment of presenting content with anonymous sources to everyone and see how readers respond.