HN user

amanjaincorp

84 karma

https://amanjain.substack.com/about

Posts3
Comments15
View on HN

MadMen AI | Founding AI Engineers, Backend Engineer, and Performance Marketer | Bay Area (Hybrid) | Full-time

We're building AI-powered ad agency. Recently raised $8m. Founded by ex-Meta founding team backed by top silicon valley VC firms. We're post-revenue (30% MoM growth).

Apply here: https://usemadmen.ai/careers

MadMen AI | Chief Applied AI Scientist | Bay Area (Burlingame, CA – ONSITE)

MadMen AI is a seed-stage AdTech startup ($8M raised) founded by ex-leaders from Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, and Instagram. We’re disrupting a $950B industry by automating ad creation with AI agents—blending Don Draper-level creativity with razor-sharp data insights.

Role:

• Lead development of AI systems for ad performance prediction and creative asset generation.

• Define and execute strategies—from data collection to model fine-tuning—to push AI from “80% good” to “99% brilliant.”

• Collaborate directly with a founding team behind multiple $1B+ ad products.

You:

• Have 6+ years of industry experience building 0-to-1 deep learning systems (modeling and evaluation expertise is crucial).

Why MadMen AI?

• Tackle a unique challenge: engineering creativity with AI. Curious? Email us at jobs@usemadmen.ai.

• Join the founding team with massive equity upside.

• Escape the typical “grind culture” – we value velocity over speed and ask plenty of why’s for greater clarity.

• Founded by seasoned AdTech experts focused on long-term impact.

• Post-revenue with +30% MoM growth.

Apply: Send your resume to jobs@usemadmen.ai. More details at https://usemadmen.ai/careers.

RE: What failed?

Agreed this is a problem that your product needs to solve either way. This idea validation playbook allows you to face the problem early on as opposed to later.

RE: What happens when you're building an improved version?

I'd ask you why you think yours is an improved version? Is that a sure shot fact or up for the market to decide. If it's sure shot, they yeah skip the idea validation step. Sounds like your idea has more execution risk than market risk.

But if you think its subjective, then that's probably something you could find a creative way of solving using the Painted Door test or something similar.

I agree different levels of "skin in the game" mean different signal.

Simple link click is pretty lousy signal and I would ignore it.

I think email is okay. Phone number is probably better. Somebody putting their credit card is really good.

I didn't mention all of that for brevity. But you could device a point based grading system based on what signal you get.

From my experience, the FB brand will get you user entering the door. I agree that's an advantage.

But the FB brand does not get your app Product Market Fit.

Those people who entered the door because of the ads $ spent, leave and then don't come back.

I'm trying to understand your feedback. Perhaps I'm missing something.

The point of the big numbers in my post is not to look at them in absolute terms. But to look at the ratio A/B. And then apply it to a much smaller audience. Because that tells helps validate that your idea will meet your expectations (whatever they may be).