HN user
Lead was added to gasoline since the 1920s. The first clinical studies that showed it was toxic were in 1969. The first country to ban it completely was Japan in 1986 and the last was Algeria in 2021. For more than a decade, people could have made a similar claim to yours, "if such an effect were true, we would have banned it already". And they would have been wrong, the effect was true.
I'm not educated on the subject. Why can't Cuba import the fertilizer and build the machines? There are open source blueprints, like the Global Village Construction Set.
I caved in and bought Premium (currently in the free trial month). It greatly enhanced the experience on my phone as well, plus I do most of my learning on youtube, so given how valuable it is for me, I don't mind paying.
The article is interesting on its own, but giving it a clickbaity title goes against the HN guidelines.
I got along well with my dad but not with my mom. Thanks, that approach seems the best course of action.
My dad died two years ago and my mom is in a nursing home with Schizophrenia. What option should I pick, "no"?
Not the person you're replying to, but this is what I found after a quick google search:
Dr. Jeffrey Flier: https://twitter.com/jflier/status/1495909501211447305?s=21
Dr. Charles Brenner: https://twitter.com/CharlesMBrenner/status/14966040557993615...
Dr. Brad Stanfield: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAFnD27ffqE
Judging by the names of the reviewers, the reviews are fake.
These are MUCH better than the ones I got for $50 from fiverr two years ago.
Right now some people can send messages even during the pomodoro sessions, so it doesn't do what it advertises.
I doubt I can be productive at programming if I have to be interrupted every 20, 8 and 2 minutes to adjust my stance. Every time I tried that I failed. Should I keep trying?
You're saying it doesn't make sense to solve problems in interviews, but you're not saying why.
It makes a lot of sense to solve problems in interviews, the interviewer gets to see your thought process and it prevents cheating by getting someone else to solve the problem. Furthermore, unlike talking about past projects, the interviewer can compare the answers of different candidates on the same problem.
Yes, but of all the cities in Eastern Europe, it's the least livable. Even Baku is better.
The reason the trend line drops over 60 is that there are fewer people over 60 taking the test and thus, the questionable responses have a bigger influence. If you sample less from that cohort, it will be less likely that your sample is representative.
Could you explain the reasoning behind your claim?
Can you elaborate? I'm interested to learn more.
But can you request a computer analysis with fishnet anymore? I have a non-patron account and I can't find that option anywhere. Old forum posts seem to talk about it working by pressing Z and being limited, but when I press Z I get a message that it is disabled by default and a link to enable it. When pressing to enable, nothing happens.
Except fishnet is used to analyze broadcasted games, puzzle discovery and others. Not used when analyzing your own games. You can easily test this by opening your task manager, monitoring your CPU usage, then opening a game you played on Lichess and toggling the aptly named "local evaluation". It's the toggle bar on the upper right, next to the text "Stockfish 14+ NNUE in local browser". You will see your CPU usage increase while the evaluation is on.
As someone who is working on a similar project (a chess mmo) and looking to validate a business model in order to get funding, how are they covering the costs? The answer usually is "donations", but there are only 402 patrons on https://lichess.org/patron and Thibault said on twitter that the average donation is $8. That's $3216/mo, less than a tenth of monthly costs. Is the rest coming from the swag store? From coaches? How much do the donations surpass the costs? Lots of missing pieces from the revenue puzzle.
You're downloading the engine from the Lichess server but the analysis is done on your computer, with your resources.
The problem you describe is poverty, not wealth inequality. While they are correlated, they are not the same. Some countries have less poverty and more inequality than others.
Try reaching out to the community of https://www.theconstructsim.com/
That's implying that automation costs that much every year, or that you must get an ROI of 100%. Almost in all cases, automation has a high setup cost but a low maintenance cost.
small improvement to your solution, 9: సقໂɜ௨ഗƊݺɷටЖݹযמຽঅ௧ปໃঅਓsຯɜ௧ࡆଈŧԥටȤ൫௧ڈໃܘ௨කІԾ௨ඝІԘ௨ಳଈݰ௨൲ຣݹஜɦܗɚ௧ปลഴஐٯүݚ௩ظݕܥ౫ಀۻࡨஶԛɒঅਏڏІŧۑڐසђߥѲಊݷѻइࢳݪޜപࡊ०ணගɛܡ౦ಬҾɚ౫ఢʂډױ3
You had the right idea, but you can tweak it to get 6: ಞজໃݎฆঘໃݞഢsງڣ௨uІݮతටଘݸభඨƙђࢲҨະࡉɷƥȣKϡuЅਘௐքධݹࠒѻІݚݸටไऄமҔ༨ຣҫටถݹଗقຣऄϥןUਘ௨ටॾ୶Ɛටไࡉɶٴलݹસඪܔঅࢳ൳Uॿԫƥϼঔଗ෮ຜࡀƶ
The part about timing it perfectly is not true. You can time it, for example predict that the market will crash, shift your money to bonds now, the market goes up for another year and then dips below the level you exited at. At that point, you can shift back and you'd have made less money than someone who timed it perfectly but more money than someone who stayed.
While the first sentence sounds like an advert, the arguments that follow are pretty compelling.
it’s important to break your fast with a nutritious, balanced meal that will further enhance the all-around cell and tissue health-boosting exercise you just undertook
Could you give some examples? What's safe to eat?
You don't need to care about possible games, but game states, what's the best result and the move to achieve it in each. Another user computed an upper bound at 8.7E+45 positions: https://github.com/lechmazur/ChessCounter . I pointed out that our planet has about 1E+50 atoms. And we can further compress the database by perhaps two orders of magnitude if we don't store symmetric positions or positions close to mate. A Kardashev 2 civilization could play perfect chess.
For comparison, there are about 10E+49 atoms making up our planet.