alpple

if you're not doing anything wrong, a government that is doing something wrong may not like it

Example of hacking with less general purpose computational models.

I imagine for example that some implementations were made fast enough to meet a requirement with some very hard algorithms.

Imagine you're a character in a Lord of the Rings novel. And math is the imaginary landscape that you are going on an adventure through. When a number is irrational, it is not easy to work with compared to natural numbers. So they're marking the map as a hard pass in the mountain ridge that is on your journey, assuming you want to explore that world.

I wonder if dry reading means written without the influence of drink. I couldn't find an answer online. But, if so, it would be ironic to describe a stat book that ignored a brewer as dry.

I buy Jansport because the zippers never break.

was it a car or a cat I saw?

The results seem so clinical or academic now. I want to read what freaks write. I often add the word reddit to my search or other platforms tags to get more opinionated and personal content.

Are all the visible wavelengths present in equal magnitude? It looks yellow to me.

We might want to be quiet until we have a better idea of our surroundings.

I think it's the product of the final number and the middle number. (given an odd length sequence)

"I know very little about actual physics, but generally speaking the more grandiose headlines sound the less I pay attention…" You've managed to find the words that I couldn't find to explain how I feel. Thank you.

If a spectrum is just a range of numbers, then the idea of spectrum should apply to many phenomenon. Many things can be described by a number. So, when matrix spectrum and atomic spectrum were formulated, perhaps spectrum was a word that was in vogue to describe a quantity. I think this is the explanation of the reason the same term is used for both. Because many connected phenomenon can be quantified. I know only a little about matrix spectrum and atomic spectrum, so take my thought with a grain of salt.

It could read: Plants grown, despite being placed in lunar soil.

I do agree that just because people describe their experience as different, that is not a convincing argument that it is very different. Sometimes people don't understand what other people are describing or assume too much. In my opinion, I think if we were to live inside someone else's mind for a day, depending on who that other person is, we may not recognize the world as the same world. I believe people are more different than many people know. Some people may be similar inside, but some people may be extremely different inside. Like you, I would also like to know more about this.

Do what YOU really want to do so if things go wrong later you're not resentful about not having tried for what you wanted? It's harder to have regrets if you tried for what you really wanted.

People aren't good at predicting the results of things that haven't happened before.

Reading literature helps with comprehension and this will extend to technical comprehension.

This is what I'm trying to ask about. What will happen if people agree not to have their views published? What effects are there?

For example, I'm curious what could happen if many of the platforms that distribute information become more narrow in what they distribute.

Anyone who knows, how will censorship play out in the future? Even censorship by private companies, I don't care how people are silenced, I'm still curious about the effects. Edit: can someone explain the effects of this kind of event that the thread is discussing? whatever you want to call it

solid work

marijuana is a non-hallucinogenic psychadelic

It could be that more complex phenomenon don't have a simple explanation. It could be that they do. But, just because I would like a why, doesn't mean that there is one. (Personally I think there is a why.)

I think people confuse having state of the art knowledge of nutrition with knowing how all of nutrition works. There may be good arguements that this is safe, but history will decide that.

I think the optimal or universal language is more difficult in practice than in idealism. Reading is the art of sorting through the mess in any field, and acquiring context. I think a lot of this underestimates the complexity and nuance of language for any field.

Can you tell me what you have in mind about where others left off, because I'd be interested in reading about freedom.

Why do we accept .999... as a valid notation. Why not only allow 1 to denote this concept?

Should they ban religious and spiritual videos too? Who decides what is real? Are ideas the coming warground? These questions sound dramatic, but I wonder about this stuff.

Good point.