almog

Anyways, besides that, the README does clearly state "The Problem" and "The Idea" which outlines exactly why the author built this particular project.

I asked about the use case _because_ the readme states a problem but does not offer a solution to that problem as far as I could see.

Other than being aesthetically pleasing (which it doubtlessly is), what's the use case for this?

I think part of what makes CORS hard to remember is the amount of conditional branches it contains, which partially stems from being modeled to have backward compatibility with HTML forms (which defines how CORS behaves for "simple requests). Remove this legacy trap and there are far fewer cases to remember.

Of course, that can't be undone now but I think the original-ish sin was when forms suddenly could perform _both_ cross origin requests _and_ get the ambient authority treatment (i.e. send the user cookies with the request though to be fair, basic auth + forms also enabled similar attacks even before cookies were introduced in the mid 90's).

Has anyone managed to use Fable for firmware reverse engineering tasks without falling back to Opus?

Depreciating doesn't just mean it could depreciate in value relative to the performance of newer GPUs, but also that its lifespan is limited by reliability issues and failures.

Or use scrcpy with the same keyboard you already have and save your neck some of the pain of staring down at your phone (as can be seen in the post).

Earlier this month I switched from Claude Code to Codex and wanted to try Gemini CLI as well. It felt far behind both CC and Codex but I wanted to give it another chance with the new Antigravity CLI. What can I say, it did surprise me and not in a good way in but two short sessions that included just two prompts (trying to reverse engineer some earbuds OTA firmware) using Gemini Flash 3.5, I managed to finish my weekly quota. I'm currently on the Google AI Pro subscription. Couldn't even figure out my tokens usage or if my plan is even counted toward usage inside Antigravity CLI.

Link to repo is broken

Given how the cache eviction policy is mismatched with the 5h usage window, it might make sense to just stop at say 97% of the session max usage and keep running a script every 4 min and 50 sec that consumes a minimal number of tokens whose entire purpose is to keep the cache. reply

Neither RAG nor loading the docs into the context window would produce any effective results. Not even including the grammar files and just few examples in the training set would help. To get any usable results you still need many many usage examples.

Uh oh, two independent thought alarms in one day! The students are overstimulated. Willie! remove all the colored chalk from the classrooms.

Posts like this on the front page make me miss N-Gate so bad...

Thanks, will add it to my reading list while I'd also recommend the classic on that topic, Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner.

Can you imagine a world without lawyers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG3uea-Hvy4

If you want to section hike it, its entire North American part is covered by the Eastern Continental Trail (ECT), which some people (very few, as in a tiny fraction of all A.T. thruhikers) thruhike it in a single calendar year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Continental_Trail

One error I think I spotted: Wooly Mammoth atill lived 4000 years ago in Wrangel Island but the the website says it got extinct 10,000 years ago.

... It comes with a free frogurt!

Tens of thousands of users? Globally you mean? I doubt it's the user base size in Gaza but if that is actually what you meant, where did you pull that estimate from?

Other than the cold start problem which isn't discussed (what's the userbase size in Gaza?), the main argument for Bitchat (or any other off-grid network such as Meshtastic, Briar, etc.) in Gaza when mainstream E2E encrypted messaging apps already exist and are widely used, is to not be dependent on Israel for cell service.

While I do really like the idea of off-grid networks in general but for this use case, is it really that hard for a state actor to jam Bluetooth (or all ~2.4GHz communication) on a large scale?

And looks like in the process any drafts users may have had are all gone now.

Got here after finding myself stuck in that exact loop (which initially I assumed was a phishing attempt from a webview ad link I thought I accidentally clicked).

Looks like some users who have never used or heard of Yubikey report being locked out and stuck in the same loop.

* Too late to edit but of course I meant Vim's verb-noun syntax.

The one time I tried Helix, I could find no way to switch from noun-verb syntax to vim's noun-verb syntax, is it possible now?

Perhaps it is a good place to mention that _today_ is the last day to submit comments on the potential effects of rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/29/2025-16...

Coming next: ...and if private sector only reports twice a year, why should we have a monthly CPI/PPI/PCE/NFP, let alone weekly unemployment numbers?

You can read the actual BLS PPI release here: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ppi.pdf

Another thing to watch for is the BLS import prices which show prices excluding tariffs. If these remain flat for July as they did for June, it would be another data point suggesting tariffs induced inflation.

You can read the actual BLS PPI release here: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ppi.pdf

Another thing to watch for is the BLS import prices which show prices excluding tariffs. If these remain flat for July as they did for June, it would be another data point suggesting tariffs induced inflation.

Those methods should be treated as idempotent

Idempotency still implies it can change state on the initial call, which to me feels wrong in the context of GET/HEAD/OPTIONS.

I think it tries to compare the export tax to the last week news about chips/semis to be subject to 100% tariffs unless they also have manufacturing in the US.

So yes, they won't have to pay tariffs because they also manufacture in the US, not because they'd (supposedly) have to pay the export tax (though it's hard to see how these two could be mutually exclusive).

How is saying that it's not all clear LLM increase experienced developers productivity an extrapolation?

The only extrapolations I've seen on this thread are people shrugging it as using 6 months old LLMs so this whole paper must be invalid today.