adocomplete

Day 1 - 7: Significant gains Days 8 - 100: Huge drawdown Days 100+: Who knows - it's already priced so high that in any sane market they would have to execute flawlessly but it's an Elon company and hype alone will keep it afloat regardless of fundamentals.

Interesting product, horrible name.

Bought FSD with my Model 3 back in 2018 here in the states. FSD still not delivered and no realistic timeline. Tesla is hoping we upgrade or sell car, but luckily we don't drive much and plan to keep it as long as it keeps running, so they'll have to make us whole eventually.

I find LLM generated Go code to be much better than other languages and love building Go apps with AI.

Don't American cars have some of the lowest levels of reliability?

I'm not super educated on all the happenings in the car industry globally, but I've seen a few videos of Chinese EVs that put anything Ford, GM or other US brands have put out to absolute shame.

So all of them?

I'm partial to http.dog

https://adocomplete.com - launched it earlier this year.

https://adocomplete.com/advent-of-claude-2025/ - my Claude Code tips based on the Advent of Claude I did over December

It's even simpler. It's just 1's and 0's.

I stand corrected.

yeah seems like an odd choice for a new project.

How is that any different from Googling something and believing any of the highly-SEO optimized results that pollute the front page?

I was thinking the same thing. Humans push terrible code to production all the time that slips through code reviews. You spot it, you fix it, and move on.

You can actually just edit the "includeCoAuthoredBy" setting in Claude Code and set it to "false".

https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/settings#availab...

Also, if you upload a video to YouTube you can download it from YouTube Studio at any time, so that doesn't add up at all.

YouTube just doesn't make this available via API, but you've always been able to manually from YouTube Studio download your uploaded videos.

Honestly, I use the foundational model tools as much as possible, so going directly to Claude, Gemini, or ChatGPT.

I personally haven't found an AI tool that's a wrapper for these that does anything better than what you can get going directly to the source.

Not preventing, but def wasting time trying to do something that I think it's able to do, but isn't.

AI is making me 100x productive in some tasks, and 2-4x in others, and 0x in some. Knowing which tasks AI is great at and delegating is like 95% of the battle.

At that point, why not just write CSS?

No.

I was never a big SO user in terms of asking questions or providing answers (maybe a total of 10 questions and ~15 answers all time), but I did browse a ton and learned a whole lot.

Thanks to ChatGPT and Claude, I just don't see the need anymore, when I can get an answer tailored to my problem in 5 seconds, and ask as many follow up questions as needed, with minimal snark.

Depends on if you learn something while making yourself. The lesson itself could be worth 10x the monetary spend (in a positive and negative way).

I think the best way to learn a language is offline through actual human interaction.

I've used Duolingo in the past (and other apps) and quickly lost interest, it's a fun app, but I feel like you don't learn from it. If I had to learn a new language today, I'm confident I could make good progress with GPT or Gemini, but tailoring it to how I learn.

It's not stinginess, it's value.

If an LLM can teach me a language, why wouldn't I go straight to the source and use GPT or Claude and customize it to my exact needs.

I feel like so many AI products these days won't be around a few years from now once more people find out that all their doing is providing a slightly different UI to what you can get directly from OAI, Anthropic, Google for cheaper and better and more tailored to you.

I remember reading about the law going into effect but had never seen the split broken out until last week.

I highly doubt the scheduling, summoning, and advertising infra is close to 60% of the cost. I like Uber, I've been a customer for a long time. It's invaluable when visiting a new place imo. I also think they can and should pay their drivers more.

Transparency, it had a bunch of other stuff to help both drivers and riders have a bit of insight into how it all works.

More info: https://www.senatedems.co/newsroom/icymi-bill-to-improve-gig...

In Colorado, a law went into effect at the beginning of 2025 that showed you how much of the actual fare the driver gets. I took an Uber ride to the airport last week and the total cost was ~$98 before tip, and the drivers share of that was reported as ~$41. I don't see how it makes sense that Uber for connecting me to a driver gets close to 60% of the fare, while the driver who does all the work, puts miles onto their car, etc, gets less than half of the fare.

Amp.

Early access waitlist -> ampcode.com

I disagree. It's all about how you're using them. AI coding assistants make it easy to translate thought to code. So much boilerplate can be given to the assistant to write out while you focus on system design, architecture, etc, and then just guide the AI system to generate the code for you.

Yeah. Honestly, I don't think I watched a music video in like 15+ years so this is a welcome change for me.