I've used Besperk back in their early beta stage and was impressed with the design and thought they'd be something like Disqus someday. But then, what Besperk focuses on is a discussion on a nice looking website. I have facebook, google+ and convore(for private discussions) to do that already. So, why use this when all the folks are out there on other networks? Again, coming back to the point. Besperk looks neat. Say if @KindSidharth sells Besperk to a company and think they've done a good job, the product is gonna go nowhere as many companies look for features that simplifies stuff and empowers them at the same time. Say this is a product X that they would be using. When someone showcases product Y to the company, there is a high probability that the company 'will' go for Y. Cuz its better. I would suggest Open Sourcing the product as "Evolution of Design happens only when its copied" as quoted by @KingSidharth himself to me once. There is a high chance that 'I' could use some of the design elements of Besperk on the next product we're building cuz it looks nice and I can showcase it to a broader audience. Looking at me, there could be several others who could use the code that is Open Sourced and there you go. Good looking forms and websites! That's my view.
Building such an innovative platform focussing highly on web based developers and now switching to printers is not really good. The technology they have underneath is pretty much cutting edge and they still have a nice chance to be a leader by open sourcing (unlike Android though) and letting developers innovate right from the platform itself. My thoughts. And also, They shelled a lot of money on advertising on stupid Music Videos and Movies which they shouldn't have done and actually launch the product out as soon as the announcement.