A more powerful search tool for the contents of Palo Alto firewall release notes: https://firewallissues.axvig.com/
A tool to periodically sync Device 42 data to Netbox (work).
HN user
A more powerful search tool for the contents of Palo Alto firewall release notes: https://firewallissues.axvig.com/
A tool to periodically sync Device 42 data to Netbox (work).
I was thinking that the writing is upside down. Very wrong IMHO to write on a floppy disk that way.
Where can I buy DRM free Anathem? The Road? Hunger Games?
Same. And in a similar vein--AnalogX NetStat Live.
A half rack weighs probably 1000 pounds. Good luck getting that into someone's basement.
A Bitcoin mining node is the simplest possible way to turn compute into money. Very minimal storage and bandwidth requirements. And yet we still do not see those in houses.
Everything about doing productive computing tasks in houses is more complicated than that! At least it is more profitable, I think?
(I wonder what a rough profit per watt figure is for a datacenter. Very much "it depends" I'm sure.)
A half rack in a rack of last decade is 8kw. A half rack of today's state of the art is 100kw.
A house older than 30 years typically has 100A 120V split phase power which can supply 25000 watts (you wouldn't want to ever fully load it...)
And an 8000 watt space heater will definitely be noisy, and produce too much heat for pretty much any house.
(Have 3yo and 1yo, another one the way, goal is 4)
I have often thought that car seats are one of the major drags of modern parenting. This study apparently (I don't have time to read it, too busy with kids lmao!) confirms my suspicions.
It is unfortunate that every policy change around them is trading some amount of convenience for every smaller risk eliminations. It is essentially impossible to say perfectly rational things like "I think children should be put in this slightly riskier type of car seat for convenience reasons."
Even if laws are relaxed, there is the peer/manufacturer pressure. As a real example, I think it is pretty annoying to have my three year old facing backwards. It would be somewhat more dangerous to have them facing forwards, but a substantial improvement in quality of life for me and for the child. The manufacturers compete based on max weight that they support/allow/claim for rear facing, something like 45 pounds. So a family member such as a spouse allegedly has decided that the child ABSOLUTELY needs to be rear facing until they reach that weight. That may not happen until age five! By this time there may be manufacturers inching up to 60 pounds rear facing.
The only possible relief I can envision is that computers become so proficient at driving our cars that there are essentially no accidents. Then we may be allowed to sit unbuckled holding our children!
There is a reason the Wordpress 100-year plan costs $38,000.
When I was a boy I had to call the library to get the definition of a word that was not in my family's dictionary. 39 years old now.
A pretty average personal blog--mix of homelab updates, tech solutions, and family ongoings.
Supermicro has some low power options such as https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/system/Mini-ITX/SYS-E...
And use a wildcard cert so that all your services don't get proved due to cert transparency logs.
Exists: https://www.hmdb.org/
My initial read of proximity being sufficient to exploit 3 is incorrect, so yeah as long as you control the Wi-Fi network sufficiently then things should be fine.
This is so bad that it must be intentional, right? Even though these are dirt cheap, they couldn't come up with $100,000 to check for run-of-the-mill vulnerabilities? There must be many millions sold. Quite handy for some intel agencies.
I assume any Wi-Fi camera under $150 has basically the same problems. I guess the only way to run a security camera where you don't have Ethernet is to use a non-proprietary Wi-Fi <-> 1000BASE-T adapter. Probably only something homebuilt based on a single board computer and running basically stock Linux/BSD meets that requirement.
A law can fix that!
Scott Locklin is one of my favorite reads, in occasional doses though. Kind of unhinged-seeming but always some perspective that seems fresh.
He's like Casey Handmer turned up to 11, and throw in a use of the word "retarded" in pretty much every post which surely is some repellent just to make certain types of people go away.
Actually I'm not sure I really get anything out of reading either of them but they provide some enjoyment and glimpse of a possible future.
I find these numbers to be way outside of what I have heard of. I would be surprised if you could give an example that comes with even 1.5x capacity. (4TB capacity, 6TB actual flash on chips, for example.)
Can you create a list of the most common book names? I think it would be funny to have a shelf of books that all have the same name.
Costs have not dropped. Computing becomes cheaper over time, but AWS largely does not.
Search Amazon for "pfsense mini pc". (smile as you think about how this triggers that one pfsense guy!) Intel N100 or N150 processor, passive cooling, typically 5 1000GBASE-T or better ports, RAM and SSD included. Should be able to get one for ~$200.
The UI for the fs.com programmer is merely "not bad". This could easily be great in comparison.
Fun fact: each one also consumes approximately $4 in electricity per year.
Assuming 2.5W typical consumption, $0.18/kWh rate. More like $8/year if you are in a high rate area!
Of course they were rigged.
I think there is a pretty big gap between wrestling being fake versus NBA, NFL, etc. being fake/rigged. The latter is a very uncommonly held belief AFAICT.
You can put multiple IPs on a computer. (Or VMs, LXCs, etc. which would each get an IP)
Now what size of machine?
(I don't really care, and the original question does have a whiff of malicious intent, but scaling discussions are sometimes interesting...)
Slow adoption of ACME by corporate customers that pay the bills. Must be a bigger effort than one would initially think, too.
The advertisers can see the traffic coming in from clicks, I would think. There would remain some opportunity for fraud by FB if some of the ad money is just for impressions but it seems like it would be difficult to keep click rate up while shorting the buyer on impressions.
Of course...dang it!