aarjaneiro

More of an FYI. Always preferred using it over news.ycombinator.com and happened to notice its expired.

Nobody is reviewing this, right?

Nobody said you should? Some people merely enjoy programming more than engineering.

Most dont :)

I wasn't expecting the answer to be "because copy-pasting would involve too much thinking".

Some people are borderline afraid to touch their keyboards these days.

Is your buddy incapable of speaking on his own behalf? Im sure he's aware of the reputational damage he's caused your company by now...

I've witnessed SQL executed with a where clause be wrapped in a function which then iterates over the result to re-enforce the where clause.

People need to read the slop they're throwing at reviewers.

Magnetic domain

Personally I've seen way more duplication as a result of AI in large codebases

the PR description is entirely Claude.

Well, clearly more than just the description. Might as well be upfront about that.

This is more about a hard dependency which causes a function to early exit

I'm absolutely right.

Just don't vibe code?

"poisoning the well"

Or the hands not being wings

"Claude clearly made things worse" &emdash; the main claim

Even this report is full of claude-introduced bugs

No, you'll need to be on call to fix all the slop falling apart

Then why did you open the pr...?

Sounds fair to me so long as students were aware going into the test that syntax would be graded

So many of the code comments on the new port concern only discussion on how it was ported, usually referring reader to the original zig implementation.

So now I'd basically be reading 2x the amount of comments and code to understand _why_ anything is happening.

Step 1: remove reference to blockchain

Step 2: insert reference to AI

At this point if I see "Made with {whatever_service_you_outsourced_thinking_to}" on a PR description and you didn't even feel like putting the effort to remove it, I'm going in with the assumption that you didn't bother to do or check a lot of things.

You don't get attribution for your work if it merely feeds into it's training data

AI boom or bubble: https://opper.ai/ai-roundtable/questions/3c481063-032

Was interesting to see opus taking the other models' disagreement as evidence to it's argument

One thing I'll give sora is that the remix feature actually required human input and enabled users to interact with each other through a novel means.

I mean... it's satire but a giant agent honeypot in and of itself would be useful. Creators of PRs for such a project could then be blacklisted elsewhere.

Green username just means new user (under 1 month iirc)