HN user

_jordan

274 karma
Posts9
Comments41
View on HN
Qt 6.3 4 years ago

That's definitely a good point. But it's also sort of self-fulfilling: those layout misalignments and RTL font issues you mentioned become less of an issue as more people embrace Qt. Chrome presumably has figured it out simply because so many people are reliant on it working. If more people embraced Qt, they'd fix the hard parts as they would have more investment.

One Year with R 4 years ago

JMP and stata are really solid tools, but I feel like the advantage stems from the fact that they help me discover new statistical methods. In the GUI I can see an option for something I never seen before, read the documentation, and therefore expand my stats skillset. This type of discoverability is a bit harder with R/Python just due to the nature of it being purely script driven.

Streamlit Sharing 6 years ago

Thanks for all your (and teams) hard work! Really liking Streamlit. One thing I've encountered is odd aspect ratio / figure sizing in matplotlib / seaborn plots, but otherwise it's been great

I've been playing around with this casually for a few weeks and am quite impressed. It's a definite improvement over Jira in simplicity and performance, but is missing quite a few features still. But still, it's my preference. I have started to appreciate light, fast, minimalist interfaces much more over time.

I do wish System76 could sell a Lenovo P53 and/or the new Dell XPS 17, but with pop installed with all the right drivers etc. It's worth the premium IMO to get a laptop you know will work well with linux.

I think it has to do with this idea that you aren't an advanced engineer if you don't use words like 'protocol buffers' and 'event-driven architecture' and 'distributed systems engineering' in your day-to-day. talking in clear and plain terms means you don't know a lot of stuff to justify your generally very high salary. (or at least, that's the flawed mindset)

I sorta feel the same way - but then I think about the 800(?) employees they have and their combined skillset in database administration, internals, research, philosophy and I'm left feeling like there has got to be a very strong technical and business use case that I just don't see. Like I would imagine that if I were locked in a room with their Sr. product people and devs, they could easily convince most people of mongodb. I would pay money to see a debate style db-off between Postgres' core devs, and representatives from Mongodb.

regarding the database question:

I hear it as:

"Tell me how detailed your understanding is of database internals in a conversational format; here is a talking prompt to help..."

regarding typing in the url question:

"Tell me the level in which you understand networking protocols"

In the real world I would hope these questions would be more of a discussion; "ah, you mention ACID, what kind of pattern can you employ to help implement that", "MVCC" etc..

This format of interview is hard to pass on simply regurgitation alone and does a pretty decent job of vetting technical understanding in a natural, conversational way.