HN user
in 1950 in the book "the human use of human beings", the famous mathematician Norbert Weiner pointed out your exact sentiment. Complaining that instead of solving problems, or doing anything new or interesting, people were using these "computing machines" to increase the efficiency of the parts of the capitalist machine that caused the problems in the first place.
Nobody listened, and nothing has changed.
I think this calls for a government funded national un-enshittification Laboratory to study the social dynamics of enshittification and develop hygiene practices. Work must be done quickly before enshittification research becomes enshittified!
Nah this tech will poison the web. People don't know what it is and take it too seriously.
I think the problem is then you eventually get SEOification. I suppose you can just reset every now and again. Maybe like give a training program to get SEO people real jobs.
Hollywood has.. hard power
Um, what??
This is a clearly false collection of arbitrary useless and arrogant opinions. See any famous reclusive intellectual or writer for counterexamples.
Because this is so depressing I am going to try think of positive aspects:
The flip side to this is the government had power because these activities required enormous resources. Perhaps it will go the other direction, if there is less of a moat other players can enter. Eg all it takes to make a state is a bunch of cheap drones and the latest government bot according to your philosophy.
Maybe it means government will massively shrink in personelle? Maybe we can have a completely open source ai government/legal system. Lawyers kind of suck ethically anyway, so maybe it would be better? With low barrier to entry, we can rapidly prototype such governments and trial them on smaller populations like iceland. Such utopias will be so good everyone will move there.
They still have to have physical prisons, if everyone is in prison this will be silly, but I suppose they can fine everyone, not so different from lowering wages which they already do.
Great idea.
Sam's sad face in the NYT article is pretty priceless.
"...Google and tech industry allies responded with a massive lobbying campaign... convince lawmakers banning targeted ads would hurt the global economy. The gambit worked, and the draft law no longer threatens Google’s advertising."
Lol, sounds like Google and the tech industry used targeted advertising to prevent a ban on targeted advertising.
agreed lol
But few to none can survive across the breadth of environments humans can with the aid of sometimes highly advanced clothing.
super cool idea! thankyou
Well run software companies with tidy, well architected software need far fewer devs than the ones with nasty bloat and a lot of legacy problems
this is a good point I can relate with!
you can work that manual labor job and still have mental energy afterwards to work on your SaaS. It's much harder doing mental tech work after already doing mentally taxing work at your job.
this is exactly what I was thinking. Thank for the validation, I'm glad someone else has this experience. Also I do a lot of debugging subconsciously, so taking other tech work is just a lot.
proton has an easy transfer process that I just did. They have to give the govt details they have in case of legal issues like squatting or whatever some bureaucrat makes up, but they can only see your devices and whatever you give them, not the content.
Idk about your style preferences though.
Edit: Hm, https://www.fsf.org/resources/webmail-systems this link below seems to say proton has javascript vulnerability...
What is the advantage of microwaves over sunlight? Seems like it would be better to just make better solar panels, sunlight is already pretty high-wattage.
Good luck!
Maybe you can sell "how to leave tech and become a carpenter" videos once chatgpt takes all the jobs. You can probably just use chatgpt to generate the videos, but probably not cut the wood.
are you becoming a farmer or a carpenter.
bahah love it.
Yeah, lol, the OOP thing is a bit dated. Maybe I should have said blockchain.
what are "legal levels"?
Can I see the list?!
Great that you can do this.
This is very old news. The encyclopaedia Britannica article on the subject says a good propagandist knows the mainstream news are untrusted, and will target their audience through receptive channels, like influencing family or social groups.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/propaganda/Media-of-propaga...
This is probably part of the BDSM role-play among certain executives.
I agree, there's a very weird media focus on layoffs right now, without broader context (number of hires, number of companies, number of unemployed, number of people in the workforce etc).
Haha, are you suggesting all products eventually break and we resort to solving problems with small hand-crafted turing machines made of sticks?
What about Hacker news?
I agree with you about the formatting it's pretty bad.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2022/12/twitter-and-the-cia-...
Re-posting comment from above because it was good, (not mine).
" The perfect unison of the mainstream news in response is itself an interesting news story. They say it is not newsworthy, and smear the journalists who say it is. How does this unanimous pronouncement of an absurdity arise? What a perfect model of the Herman-Chomsky propaganda model. A few outsider journos point at a monstrous 1984-like mass mind-control operation and all the insider journos nervously cough and change the subject. Hm. "