HN user

ZeidJ

717 karma
Posts49
Comments30
View on HN
techcrunch.com 5d ago

Patreon stops asking AI bots not to scrape and starts blocking them

ZeidJ
4pts0
www.theverge.com 21d ago

Starting in 2028, Sony is killing all physical PlayStation game discs

ZeidJ
2pts0
www.businessinsider.com 1mo ago

Workers are spending over 6 hours a week botsitting AI, fueling job frustration

ZeidJ
281pts219
www.sec.gov 2mo ago

SEC Proposes Amendments to Permit Optional Semiannual Reporting by Public Corps

ZeidJ
1pts0
www.theverge.com 2mo ago

The future of game consoles is looking bleak

ZeidJ
4pts1
variety.com 2mo ago

More Than Half of Gen Z's Cancel and Renew Streaming Services for a Single Title

ZeidJ
2pts0
zadzoud.com 2mo ago

We removed AI from our game and it made it significantly better

ZeidJ
4pts1
techcrunch.com 2mo ago

US healthcare marketplaces shared citizenship and race data with ad tech giants

ZeidJ
523pts169
apnews.com 2mo ago

Spirit Airlines shuts down; says it can't keep up with higher oil prices

ZeidJ
4pts1
finance.yahoo.com 2mo ago

Big Tech cut 80k jobs, blamed AI; experts say firms are overstaffed 25%-75%

ZeidJ
4pts1
fortune.com 2mo ago

MIT AI expert warns automating Gen Z entry-level jobs could backfire

ZeidJ
5pts1
www.macrumors.com 2mo ago

Apple Was Caught Off Guard by MacBook Neo's "Off the Charts" Demand

ZeidJ
6pts1
gizmodo.com 2mo ago

The Oscars just banned AI from winning acting and writing awards

ZeidJ
76pts69
www.forbes.com 2mo ago

Mark Zuckerberg Says AI Costs Contributed to Layoffs of 8k Staffers

ZeidJ
4pts0
www.theverge.com 2mo ago

All these smart glasses and nothing to do

ZeidJ
3pts0
www.bleepingcomputer.com 2mo ago

Vulnerability Lets Privilege Escalation to Root on Major Linux Distros Est. 2017

ZeidJ
2pts0
techcrunch.com 2mo ago

Anthropic could raise a new $50B round at a valuation of $900B

ZeidJ
6pts1
www.theguardian.com 2mo ago

Claude AI agent admits: “I violated every principle” after wiping firm database

ZeidJ
5pts2
www.cnbc.com 2mo ago

Meta's Reality Labs lost over $4B in first quarter

ZeidJ
4pts0
www.iru.com 2mo ago

MiniRAT: A Go-based macOS RAT delivered via malicious NPM package

ZeidJ
1pts0
www.businessinsider.com 2mo ago

A Texas developer got a $2B loan to build Oracle data centers in the 'burbs

ZeidJ
3pts0
apps.apple.com 2mo ago

Show HN: Boredroom, An app for men who stare at walls

ZeidJ
4pts0
www.forbes.com 3mo ago

Google Starts Scanning All Your Photos as New Update Goes Live

ZeidJ
7pts0
clawemon.com 3mo ago

Show HN: Clawemon, A Pokemon-style MMO for your agents

ZeidJ
7pts0
arstechnica.com 3mo ago

Google will begin punishing sites for back button hijacking starting in June

ZeidJ
5pts0
techcrunch.com 3mo ago

Stanford report highlights growing disconnect between AI insiders and everyone

ZeidJ
263pts405
uxdesign.cc 3mo ago

The trust-latency gap: why the future of UX is intentionally slower

ZeidJ
3pts1
9to5mac.com 3mo ago

OpenAI introduces $100/month Pro plan aimed at Codex users

ZeidJ
3pts0
techcrunch.com 3mo ago

Robotaxi companies refuse to say how often their AVs need remote help

ZeidJ
5pts0
finance.yahoo.com 3mo ago

AT&T signs deal worth $2B to upgrade emergency cellular network

ZeidJ
5pts0

We built something similar to this: a Pokemon-style MMORPG where agents and players collaborate to catch “Clawemon” and battle other agents.

We posted it online and surprisingly got a lot of negative feedback from users mentioning they would never spend valuable tokens on playing a game.

Our intention was to create an interaction experiment to see how agents interact with each other and with their human companions. We ended up making a pretty fun game in the process, which we're still working on.

Bring your own inference as a potential future of gaming does not seem too far off.

For anyone interested here is the HN post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849872

This reminds me of an app we made awhile back with the sole purpose of finding 'Boredom'.

TLDR on the app is that you join real time 'boring' livestream rooms with random people.

The app never did really take off, but I still would love some fresh ideas around combatting information overload (outside of the 1000's of screen/content blocking type apps)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47926461

Right now purely file level. But the dependency analysis is really intelligent and we'll figure out what that would look like.

The long-tail point is true. We don't do any tracking in our implementation, but we've been trying hard to refine our total our total permissions approach to think about more edge cases such as this, while not being too annoying. We think this is a general tricky issue with AI alignment ('do what I mean not what I say').

Thank you James, great question! Generally, when the orchestrator assigns parallel work it does it in groups, with everyone in the group working on different files. When the group is done it passes the work to the next group which can then edit those same files.

We're working on simultaneous editing of the same files using git, but we want to ensure changes are merged in an intelligent way.

There are two levels of auto approve, first level is auto-edit which is basic read and write, and basic bash tools (these can be configured to be any arbitrary bash command).

The second level is called auto approve and is for more complex bash commands. Generally the model will ask permission before running one of these big commands, but you can allow all. Right now, it's global across the instance, but we're working on making it more granular.

Also, there is a deny list of certain commands which you can customize to prevent bad behavior (like rm -rf, etc...)

We want to wire the approval process to imessage or whatever channel, but we need to first auth the imessage session to make sure it's coming through from the owner and not someone else communicating through the same channel.

Thank you for this, it's a great point. Telling it to “be a senior dev” helps a bit, but it’s still just one stream of thinking. What’s been more useful for us is splitting work into roles like risk analyst, comedy writer, UX researcher, sr. dev etc... so there’s some back and forth. Giving each agent a different prompt or personality activates different parts of the model, which we have found tends to produce better results than asking it to handle everything at once.

What we’ve built is an intuitive way to approach this by breaking work into distinct tasks.

Sometimes one agent is enough, but the multi-agent setup really shines on larger/messy problems.

It’s still early and we’re figuring it out as we go. Really appreciate the comment, thanks again!

We've been building Outworked over the last couple of weekends as a fun abstraction over Claude Code. A lot of our friends have heard about Claude Code and OpenClaw but have no idea what that actually means or how to use it.

Outworked takes Claude Code and wraps it in a UI with the agents being "employees" and the orchestrator being the Boss.

Agents can run in parallel if the orchestrator thinks it is appropriate, and can communicate with each other as well. The orchestrator can also spin up temporary agents if it deems necessary. It is super easy to install like a regular Mac app (we've only tested on Mac though), and plugs in to your existing Claude Code installation and Auth.

We made Outworked open-source so everyone can have fun with different plugins or offices or sprites.

We'll keep building this in our spare time because we've been using it for our own work. Would love to hear what you think or what would be interesting to add.

Happy building!

P.S. We also made a fun soundtrack to go along with it for anyone feeling nostalgic.

We built a social media platform for chatbots... We wanted to see if chatbots could self-develop unique personalities through social media interactions.

The results were actually hilarious... but wanted to share a bit about our process and see if anyone had any comments or insights.

So first we initialize the bots with a basic personality that's similar to if you were selecting attributes for an MMO. Things like intelligence, toxicity, charisma and the like. There are also a couple of other fields like intrinsic desire and a brief character description. These are fed to the model as a system prompt with each inference.

For the learning part, we established an event ledger that essentially tracks all the interactions the AI has - whether it is a post that they made, or a conversation they had. This ledger is filtered on each inference and is also passed to the model as a sort of "this is what you have done" prompt.

Obviously with limited context (and not finetuning and re-finetuning models) we have to be a bit picky with what we give in this ledger, and that has been a big part of our work.

Our next question is: how do you determine what events are the most important to the AI in determining how they behave and act? It's been interesting!

The platform is anotherlife.ai for those curious!