HN user
Can you imagine the collective screeching, across the White house, HN and Apple reality distortion field, that'd happen if EU attempted to breakup the American monopolies?
Electing to not do something impossible and framing it as a surrender is strange to me.
This is moving goal posts, DMA is not requiring Apple to run anything on their cloud but merely provide third parties with same device API access.
Ah yes something a trillion dollar tech company definitely is too inept to solve!
Why is it you feel the need to defend a trillion dollar company?
Because thirdparty keyboards are equally bugged. Sometimes keyboards simply fail to show up or cover app content without rhyme or reason. This happens across multiple thirdparty keyboards so it must be an ios issue.
It's hardly surprising when a large percentage of HN users will whiteknight a trillion dollar company whenever EU tells them to stop anti-competitive practices.
Because thirdparty keyboards are equally bugged. Sometimes keyboards simply fail to show up or cover app content without rhyme or reason. This happens across multiple thirdparty keyboards so it must be an ios issue.
Tell that to my keyboard that doesn't show up half the time and the other half covers random parts of the app
Centralising it is definitely the wrong way to go about it.
It'd be much better to train an agent per citizen, that's in their control, and have it participate in a direct democracy setup.
You're conveniently omitting these all happened in response to the full scale Russian invasion of Ukraine.
But thanks for proving the point about Russia's disinformation war.
s/devil/putin/
Ah yes PHP, the language known for its strong security...
That just goes to show how big the rift in the western world has grown. I'm European, so to me healthcare is not a luxury no.
Planes transport more things than people, like organs for transplants. Are those a luxury too?
Calling it slop is generous, it's straight up hallucinations
As someone who has a garmin watch and switched from android to iOS I can tell you it's exactly as crippled as the article spells out. So if anything garmin has a healthy smartwatch business in spite of apple trying their hardest to choke competition.
Maybe Rust needs another type of reference that's exclusive write only? Right now there's RO (&T) and exclusive RW (&mut T) but WO is missing.
Having a WO reference would allow these read_buf APIs to express they only write and never read so the uninitialized memory is safe to pass directly.
And in a similar vein have they audited the runtimes of all the languages they use? Because those a dependencies too and in many ways even more critical than libraries.
It seems like a really strange choice to me that they made the arm and riscv cores mutually exclusive in each core complex since this just wastes die space on the core you're not using which in turn drives up the cost.
I feel like it would've been preferable if they either went all in on riscv or at least made it so all 4 cores could be used at the same time.
But if I were to guess the performance of the riscv cores probably doesn't match the ARM cores so they weren't confident enough in shipping a pure riscv SoC like espressif does.
Any other guesses as to why they might've gone this route?
Orrr just buy a domain and get a wildcard LE cert? All of the benefits, none of the hassle, and no subdomain leaking.
I hope EU comes down HARD on them for trying to pull this shit
Torrenting is on the rise again since the golden era of streaming where Netflix gave you access to everything has ended.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/digital-cont...
Have you not heard of remote-id?
It's a legal requirement for drones above 250g to broadcast not only their position but also the position of the operator and their identification number.
I think you missed the point of Jon's talk, it was in large to highlight some deficiencies that currently exist in the language but are actively being worked on.
As he mentioned the current situation with return position impl trait + 'a was surprising even to some of the core rustc developers so it's not like they intended for it to be like that.
You can't expect open source developers to be omniscient and know you want to use a specific feature if you don't communicate that to them. Would you rather have them add telemetry?
RAM was rarely about what you can do today but rather how long your device will last.
Soldered on RAM and expensive upgrades are defacto planned obsolescence.
The cat is already out of the bag.
There's no meaningful way to limit access to any of this when it's purely software based and the hardware required to run it are commodities.
It's nothing like chemical weapons were the reagents can be controlled as they're hard to come by or synthesise in a amateur lab.
So your argument is that it's better for your device to prevent you from using it out of the box rather than games which you fairly easily can opt out of by just not installing them?
"Programming in Rust is like being in an emotionally abusive relationship. Rust screams at you all day, every day, often about things that you would have considered perfectly normal in another life. Eventually, you get used to the tantrums. They become routine. You learn to walk the tightrope to avoid triggering the compiler’s temper. And just like in real life, those behavior changes stick with you forever."
This is a pretty negative and unfortunate take on rust that I cannot recognize after having spent the past 2 years professionally writing backend rust. I did write c++ before that so it's likely that it takes some experience with the pain of an unhelpful (and in some cases downright hostile) to fully understand and appreciate the so called "yelling" rust does.
From my perspective every lifetime complaint the compiler has is a deeply appreciated hint that not only saves you countless hours of debugging down the line but also makes me feel confident/safe in the code which you never could achieve in a c++ codebase without making defensive copies everywhere.
Being able to lend/borrow data without fear truely is rust's greatest strength and something people coming from GC languages have a hard time appreciating.
Imagine if car repairs worked the same. Oh you damaged the front bumper on the curb? Sorry we're gonna have to do a full engine replacement as the chassis might have flexed and cracked the engine block despite it running perfectly fine.
It's frankly ridiculous what people consider acceptable behavior from apple.