HN user

Xunjin

549 karma
Posts1
Comments288
View on HN

This argument is so flawed in many ways, economies are built by people for people. Extrapolate the numbers, let's say in the COVID Pandemic a country, take USA as example, has 10% percentage of their population killed by it, would that be better to the economy?

I believe it means that he has the privilege to save amount of money, do what he wants and later on go back to the industry in a good position.

Remember that there are people who never had the opportunity to study or lives in a precarious situation.

Funny, Amazon never contacted me, now after I'm 3 months in a new job, they did, but ain't paying half of how much I earn in this new one, and requires me to move to a major city in Brazil to work, sigh...

Claude Fable 5 1 month ago

"we should put on hold the development of AI because the world is not ready for it"

Yeah... We need open models so we don't have that BS.

The world is not that simple, let's say you do pay overtimes, the salary in this industry is already low, will that be worth it to the employee?

Claude Opus 4.8 2 months ago

Hey simonw I love your test, do you think using thinking level "max" makes sense for this test? I would love to see the results about it.

Another part also says: "After Musk announced he was resigning from OpenAI in February 2018, Musk gave a departing speech at an all-hands meeting, Brockman testified. In front of about 40 OpenAI employees, Musk said that he was leaving because the only viable path that he saw forward was for OpenAI to merge with Tesla. However, the other leaders did not think so, Musk said, choosing a different path that Musk would never choose. According to Brockman, the speech was meant to lower morale at OpenAI, as workers understood that Musk was leaving to pursue artificial general intelligence (AGI) at Tesla because he no longer had confidence in OpenAI."

Still his goals was to merge with Tesla... Ain't this also steal a charity?

Let me play out a scenario, imagine to use a Desktop Hardware like a complete built rig, you would need a specific OS like Windows 11 and you could not run Linux on it, just because it's a vendor lock-in.

Why is this acceptable for phones but would not for the case above?

I know a lot of people don't care, and that's ok, but we should root for an open choice for the users.