Steve0

You could let users import their own Google api key...

I have grown up seeing my parents write physical paper cheques.

It's basic life goods and everything is still signed for, tracked and registered. Besides, banks love to collect interest.

Check out Llama, Alpaca, Langchain, Dalai.

Would be strange not to use the Bing crawlers for that.

Feels like arpanet atm, so give it some time. https://online.jefferson.edu/business/internet-history-timel...

Just to add some more context, these were used back in the day at chill areas of hacker conferences.

Back then wifi (if available) was not very reliable, and battery tech less advanced. People carried network cables and extension cords in their backpack.

I presume there is some selection bias to take into account here.

Isn't this comparable to the guy in the Ferrari being mad at other drivers because he's in the same traffic jam as the rest or us?

I get where he's coming from, but that doesn't make it reasonable. And certainly not a scam by Ferrari.

Does anyone have an idea of what the retail price might be?

It depends on the qr-code scanner you have on your phone. The one on my android shows a button 'connect to this network'.

In regards to security, you are completely correct. But this is to be used in cases where one would put a paper with the password on the wall, think of coffee shops. Saves some typing. Or you can put a card on your coffee table to help out your house guests.

If there are no other cars, people make them last. They are simple so easy to repair. They don't have many parts, so not much can break.

Well, it wasn't "the record companies" as a whole. The creative nomad player was during the same period and had no such limitations. Sony, being a record company and a hardware company, limited their players in this way. And basically paved the way for other companies to take over the market.

Sad because their walk-man was basically the standard before, and sony makes some good hardware.

An apology used to go a long way... in my perception. Could be wrong of course.

Less affluent users could use a staking pool, where they send some of their eth and get a certain percentage return.

Many crypto-exchanges already offer this service.

Just pull the ends to get it off. Works great, never gets untied.

Here is a policy of a London casino explaining their facial recognition to be compliant with the gdpr. I suppose this was written pre-brexit.

https://www.hippodromecasino.com/facial-recognition-policy/

Not deleted.

I moved actix-net and actix-web project to my personal github account. I will make decision during next couple days what to do. I don’t want to see the project becomes ghost of what it was. Maintainers must understand how everything work, but don’t anyone who does and those who could are busy with other projects. At the moment I am planing to make repos private and then delete them (will remove benchmarks as well), unless others suggest better ideas.

It should be noted that the code wasn't deleted, but forked to his private repo, where it's still open for anyone to use, download, fork, ...

I've never heard of "implicit promises". For me a promise is by definition explicit. Anything else are assumptions, in this case false assumptions.

I tend to type guid in duckduckgo. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Guid

Bad idea?

Be the change you want to see in the world: https://github.com/SumeetMoray/Nearby-Shops-End-User-Android...

If you don't trust a provider the obvious choice is to use another one.

The document sees the 51% attack originating from token holders, not miners.

Yes, the device the user paid 99 dollars for and is now useless. So for the user to get his money back he has to send back the device.

Fair enough, but please tell them that before they enter a contract with you. Don't take their cash followed by not providing a service for reasons not stipulated before accepting the money.

Bit disappointing it's not available in my country.

Also http://bluehackers.org/

It's related to release management, see this video: https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10100259101684977... .

In short: FB employees get to see the new features first, and are encouraged to submit bug reports.

That doesn't seem to be the conclusion of said experiment. "In Milgram's first set of experiments, 65 percent (26 of 40)[1] of experiment participants administered the experiment's final massive 450-volt shock, though many were very uncomfortable doing so; at some point, every participant paused and questioned the experiment, some said they would refund the money they were paid for participating in the experiment." IMHO Milgram's experiment has more to do with obedience than ethics.

It's my impression that those voting things are a way to make money for the company that initiates the voting. In your concept it's the other way around.

I'm curious who your customers will be.