SheddingPattern

Get a job at IBM/Deloitte or P&G and you'll see no end of things still left to do

Mercedes is ahead of Tesla in self driving. Sae 3 vs 2

Thank you!

Any writer or communities in this space that I could engage with to find out more?

Is the best way to just join a sales team?

What does speaking with impact entail?

More of a thing, but it's mostly DevOps.

Because sometimes all they're after is for slideware on GenAI. The people they fired encapsulated a spirit of innovation that doesn't fit the operating model and therefore is of no value to them.

Is there anything that signals this person is high-value?

Are there any roles or departments, relevant to this audience, that are particularly safe?

I imagine you cut mostly from loss-centres as with profit centres you can tell who is making and who isn't, right?

Who hires and who do you present your recommendations to, what are their decision criteria?

Very generous of you to do this. I really appreciate it.

Thanks in advance.

Edit: Grammar and manners

Sounds like you are talking from experience. Are you storage specialist, how did you learn so much about this?

Tell us more

Credit Suisse is a top 50 bank while SVB doesnt even make the top 100. SVB dissapearing leads to a lack of choice. Credit Suisse may pose a genuine global systemic risk.

Ironic that the author calls PMs "not very smart at making product decisions" while the author is not smart enough to understand the role of sales or product.

Also, innovation is not an end in itself. The question is do, PMs add value?

The author is right that the founder is the best product manager and should only handover to a dedicated PM once the business is ready to scale.

No, but you misunderstood the audience for an engineering strategy, namely other c-level execs.

User 'jschveibinz' describes it well.

Comparing what happened to FTX to a tiny leak in a gas tank due to a money saving measure by von Braun to balance the budget of the Apollo 11 mission, which results in a catastrophic failure and erroneously puts in question the ambition and mission to visit the moon and quantitative methods employed, is completely asinine.

This underplays what happened. FTX implosion appears to be due to fraud, lack of controls within the organisation and puts in question the judgement of the EA community, VCs, auditors, media.

The lessons to draw are not technical in nature. To continue the author's analogy: Wehrner von Brau as an individuap, construction and inspection procedures, or security culture at Nasa. They are instead fundamental. And would put in question all of NASA, the ecosystem (universities, suppliers), funders like the Congress and the president , and any oversight agencies.

If the what we've learnt so far is confirmed, then a Sequoia investment and its due diligence failed, trust in the EA community is undermined as it is not particularly ethical or rational.

When you research a new product, on what platform is it the review hosted and do the reviewers make a living out of reviews? I believe that that the line between advertising and reviews are increasingly blurred

The perception is that this is a large part of what constitutes the art market.

Interesting but i wish there was more depth to it. From the article: >there remains a vital commercial subsphere in the artworld The above is offered in opposition to the para-academic side of the art world. However, that sentence does a lot of heavy lifting. There are well known issues with money laundering in the art world, tax evasion, speculation etc... Given that the commercial side of art may notbe a proper market, i am not sure that it is vital in the sense of bringing vitality to the art world.

Sometimes there are three decent ca candidates but only one role, so yeah "you were great"

Exactly. Is this story anything other than marketing? Something to keep interest in their flagship product.

Thinking of a recruiter as a teacher doesn't seem accurate to me. They should not be expected to understand the company well or the role of the software team in the company. Recruiters are intermediaries whose role it is to save the hiring manager's valuable time. They will focus on the initial scanning of profiles (does this vaguely look like a developer profile?), be responsible for scheduling and maybe salary negotiations as this means you can start a fresh relationship with your hiring manager without the potential tension left over from a salary negotiation. The exception are executive search professionals who will understand the business model well, but even they would not be able to recommend a book.

Teams is more widely used than Zoom in my view. Significantly more.

Overthinking by definition is thinking too much. What he describes is just thinking

It's the lack of conviction that will lead to burnout.

Would it be interesting to do this for all knowledge artefacts? Books, articles, blog posts, blogs. It would create a graph of all these works after all they/respond to each other but also who reads what.

I've seen architecture roles in startups that focus on legacy industries, like public sector or banking. Consider adjacent roles like engineering manager or technical program manager if you have delivery experience. Another opportunity is a senior position in a startup's professional services arm, similar to forward deployed engineer but may have titles like implementation engineer, customer success engineer eer, or solution architect.

That proves the point he was only mid-twenties so still young

No

Slack is a though sell for a enterprise organisation with a large suite of Microsoft tools. Of course Slack is better than Teams the person making the decision doesn't care. Also Teams is good enough.

This is a very idiosyncratic list. While they point out that the list focuses on intrinsic reasons, they seem the author's reason's not to be a manager but dont "generalise". For example, not having the opportunity to job hop, or you can do all the fun tasks an Individual Contributor. The first one may be true, but that in and of itself is only a tool to manage a career progression and pay. The second one is only true if you consider management to be only that which overlaps with a Sr individual contributor might do: mentoring, decision making. There is more on the management path. The type of manager a sr developer transitions into is really only the beginning of a career path - and the article is written from that perspective.