Seattle3503

You are talking about false negatives, but this thread started with a discussion around the potential for false positives causing writers anxiety

Even if 2/10000 is true that’s nowhere near accurate enough to make aggressive accusations that create anxiety at levels people need to medicate with potentially fatal consequences.

False positives and false negatives are different problems that have different impacts.

Does your single example prove that Pangram doesn't work, or that it doesn't work on short snippets of text? Try to get a detection error on a longer run of text. I'd be curious to see the results, particularly if you can get a false positive.

Pangram’s market claims are very different from independent validations of the platform.

Do you have a link to independent validations? The ones I found, like an upcoming nber paper confirm the companies claims.

Maybe, but we should force them to make that argument after we demonstrate age verification doesn't require identifying ourselves to every website. It would reveal they aren't seeking pragmatic solutions.

Are there hollistic analysis? I generate income with my labor, but I also save in retirement and investment accounts. On analysis like this that we typically see, are these two things competing? Are we really just seeing a rise in retirement savings?

I'm happy with Pangram so far.

What if I run it through an AI detection model (eg Pangram) first, and if the shows up as AI I skip it entirely. Does that work for you?

Time for Graphene based streaming boxes?

What are people building with Iroh?

Presumably the people paying the author for translation services are aware of AI, but for whatever reason are choosing a humans services instead. IMO it would be a form fraud to heavily rely on AI and not disclose that to the customer.

Why was the board involved in that decision to begin with?

The valuation must be outside of the tech. Are there relationships or contracts Accenture is getting access to?

What companies are examples of that bait and switch strategy?

Does mercurial allow you to re-write history like that?

The rules around CVE reporting changed recently and it would be expected a lot more are accepted.

My team has been using AI to add code, but also to aggressively remove old deprecated code. "Is anyone still using this? How does this get called" is easier to answer when you can toss your FE, BE, and entire codebase at an agent and let it create a map of your software project. IDEs can do this in a single language to some degree usually in a single project, but RPC, REST, etc... break some of these tools in a lot of IDEs.

Are you a dev? What does part time look like?

I have a similar problem in a community I'm a a part of? How are you reliably detecting AI?

Yes

The question is whether the company can show, before rolling a product out to billions of people, that it is not predatory by design.

"Not predatory" is a negative

Proving something is addictive is not proving a negative

And examples where it goes right. Federal reserve, FDA, SEC, etc..

You create an agency and give it a mandate that requires it to balance concerns.

The burden of proof should fall on the platform, not the victim. The question is not whether a harmed user can show specific damage. The question is whether the company can show, before rolling a product out to billions of people, that it is not predatory by design.

That's asking every company to prove a negative before rolling out new features.

Could we have a regulatory agency that keeps an eye on dark patterns and deals with them as evidence emerges that something is harmful.

Only for a subset of people. Many would accept solutions that preserve privacy. Divide and conquer. Remove supporters from the anti-privacy group.

If I need to grab 100 locks, they are all moving around a lot, but I've got the first 10, will the order be the same for someome trying to get the same 100? Eg maybe someone swaps two that neither of us has grabbed yet.

I don't think they were talking about the size of the codebase. How much funding does emacs require to maintain?

If you're running in a docker container you share the host kernel. You might not have a choice.

Am I still allowed to invoke cc in a bash script, or is that out too? Interactive sessions only.

Agreed, I found this article hard to follow and emotive in a way that made it feel extremely biased.

I did, but the govt is one of my companies customers

I'm hopeful that improvements in LLMs mean we can ditch ORMs (under the guise that they are quicker to write queries and the inbetween mapping code with) and instead make good use of SQL to harness the powers that modern databases provide.

Maybe we can ditch active models like those we see in sqlalchemy, but the typed query builders that come with ORMs are going to become more important, not less. Leveraging the compiler to catch bad queries is a huge win.