HN user

Scorpiion

98 karma

Previous startup founder waiting for the next thing to be obsessed with.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertakerblomandersson

Posts3
Comments37
View on HN

Looks like a nice service, it also sounds like something the SaaS companies who's pricing information you are showing would not like.

I'm curious how you look at that? Are there any legal risks for end users to share this type of information via your site? I'm thinking if the SaaS providers have some legal statements about not sharing prices (similar to how certain database providers don't allow sharing of database benchmarks).

Hi bob1029, very interesting to hear about your experiences and point of view. Easy to forget the impact of how easy it's to sell an end product/service based on your selection of database (it does not always matter of course). I have thought about this as well, no one (?) will question if your app/service uses postgres but if you say sqlite I assume there will be some more questions.

Would you mind sharing some numbers of what you consider an "aggressive RPO", and what RPO number sqlite+litestream can still handle? Of course, it will depend on the use case, but if you would do a rough estimate. I think it could be helpful for a lot of readers.

I wonder if the decision to make all enterprise features open source was affected/influenced by the Neon release/announcement recently? The timing makes me wonder, or has this been planned for a very long time?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31753345

Either way, great news! I've been curious to try out Citus many times but the fact that many of the best parts has been closed has held me back a bit, I think it's great with more postgresql open source extention options.

Very interesting, tempted to apply to the company as this sounds very promising and fun to work on...

I'm curious about the business side of things, to give some context, some open source models that startups use today are:

1. The "open core" model, Gitlab being a good example. They try to split features that are open or closed/enterprise depending on the buyer.

2. The AGPL model, Mongodb used to do this, today a popular example is Grafana and their collection of products.

3. The Apache + cloud backend model, the core being standalone working with Apache license while building a value added managed service. I think this is what Synadia is doing with NATS.

4. The "source available" model, not really open source, but worth mentioning as it's very popular recently. Examples Mongodb, Elastic, Cochroachdb and TimescaleDB. This is often combined with open source such that some parts are open source, others source available.

With this as a reference Nikita, how would you explain how Neon thinks in regards to licensing and eventually building a healthy business? It's obvious a managed database service is the money maker, but how do you think around compeditors taking the project and building managed services without or with minimal code contributions? I'm sure you guys have thought a lot about this, would be interesting to hear some thoughts and reasoning for or against different options.

(Note: This is not meant to be an extensive explanation of these business models just a high level overview. If I have miscategorized some company above feel free to correct me in a comment.)

MIT-0 License 4 years ago

FYI this is from 2018.

I thought it was something released recently but saw on Github that it's from 2018.

As others have mentioned there is a menu option to show the tables. You can also run this sql query to see the tables:

SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='table'

Yeah, I did not really understand that comment either. According to the same article they had more than 1/3 of their raised funds still in the bank (1/3 of $95 million).

I was reading through the docs and this FAQ is worth checking out: https://github.com/canonical/dqlite/blob/master/doc/faq.md

In includes an answer about the difference with rqlite.

To me reading the docs it seems like dqlite has been developed by the team who develops LXD at Canonical as LXD is listed as the biggest user of the project and it says on the authors github that he works at Canonical at/with LXD/LXC.

Interesting project, good luck to the author/authors if you read this!

This is a good idea, I got tempted to try this. Found this page on their homepage (in Swedish): https://www.klarna.com/se/dataskydd/

Where it says you can email this address "dataskydd@klarna.se" if you either want them to delete your data (except data they are required to store as a bank) or if you want a print out of your personal information they store.

The matching UK site (in English) is here: https://www.klarna.com/uk/privacy-policy/ and has this email for the same purpose: "privacy@klarna.co.uk"

I tried to find more information about this statement:

"When authenticating the login you authorize one of Klarnas third parties to log into your bank account as you, allowing them to pull records of all your financial transactions, account statements etc.“

Do you have any source to verify this claim? That they can and do pull down this information. I would like to know if they really have all that information or not, if so it's a surprise to me, did not know that.

Go 1.9 is released 9 years ago

Ah, thanks for the links.

I googled a little bit and found some good info, I guess I had forgotten a little bit of the concepts of mutex fairness/unfairness. I found a very nice explanation on cs.stackexchange:

  "My understanding is that most popular implementations of a mutex (e.g. std::mutex in C++) do not guarantee fairness -- that is, they do not guarantee that in instances of contention, the lock will be acquired by threads in the order that they called lock(). In fact, it is even possible (although hopefully uncommon) that in cases of high contention, some of the threads waiting to acquire the mutex might never acquire it."
Source: https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/70125/why-are-most-mu...

With that computer science clarification, I think the comment "Mutex is now more fair" and the detailed description "Unfair wait time is now limited to 1ms" makes it a lot clearer.

Great improvement I think! It's one of those things that you don't notice until you have a bug, but it's really nice to never get that bug in the first place. =)

Interesting to see the changes of their product packaging (and price) over time:

1. https://web.archive.org/web/20141020025157/https://www.netli...

2. https://web.archive.org/web/20160505192926/https://www.netli...

3. https://web.archive.org/web/20170221195249/https://www.netli...

4. https://www.netlify.com/pricing/

The model of charging per site was removed in [4], the "low tier" $9 per site was also removed, maybe it was not differentiated enough from the free version to be worth the effort. It also seems they introduced "paying per user" in between [3] and [4], maybe that was a form of substitute for the removal of the site limit.

Disclosure: I am a founder of a cloud hosting startup called Sourcevoid, that's in part why I think looking at pricing and packaging of hosting services is interesting, but thought others might like seeing the links above as well.

An interesting fact I think is worth mentioning is that Docker for Mac uses a forked and currently closed version of xhyve, and not the same xhyve that we can find on Github. The last commit to open source xhyve was May 27.

With that said Docker has plans to open source it, I wonder if that will happen soon as they declare Docker for Mac ready for production. That would imply that the xhyve port also should be ready be contributed back or spin out into a new project (the quote below said they were not sure if they wanted to contribute back or make a new project).

Personally I think the "right thing to do" would be to contribute back to xhyve, at the same time I have a feeling it's more valuable for Docker Inc to "own" and control their own fork/project so I would guess they will go down that path instead (it would still be open source, just under a different project name).

Source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11356293

EDIT: I stand corrected, see talex5 comment below, I had missed the hyperkit announcement.

Hi, I have ads running on three subreddits right now, the smallest one has only 1,460 readers. Considering the CTR (click-through rate) I guess putting ads on subreddits smaller than that might not be worth it, even if that ad has been live for over a week it's still at less than 400 impressions/views.

As a reference, I have an ad on the /r/programming/ as well with 678,120 readers, that one has 113,613 impressions/views during the same time period.