RyanAF7

Hannah Arendt wrote about this in The Banality of Evil.

Bureaucracies which create disassociation from accountability are necessarily evil.

So yeah, I'd imagine you're correct.

Global Warming is bullshit.

Yes, and he underwent said abuse at Harvard by a doctor named Henry Murray who was apart of the division that created MKUltra/MKSEARCH and who had previously administered LSD to unwitting patients.

Lets get real, when your goal is complete ego control, all forms of mindfucking are on the table.

Also, almost all of the MK Ultra files were destroyed. So what people know is residual and stories from guilt ridden scientists and abused people.

Nice abstract.

Being a judge is a career and an incredibly competitive one at that.

Being a scientist is very similar.

Better to play it safe than to risk looking incompetent. Or worse, politically vulnerable.

Authoritarian technocracies require experts and "consensus" to overwhelm people into popular complacency.

Laws matter less, so Judges matter more.

This blog was written 4 years after Jeff Bezos invested in Google.

Yeah no shit. Don't trust Hacker News either.

uh oh...here comes the facial data leak

All things are zero-sum if you try hard enough.

"I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins! It was Sloan Ketterin and Johnny Hopkins and they were blazing that shit up every day."

This might be true.

Intentional. Zuck should go to jail.

Not to mention the political advantage of framing your opponents base as having poor judgment or lacking discernment by producing fake stories you know they are more likely to read, share and believe than your own base.

Politics today is far more deceptive because the speed of delivery and feedback for communications allows it to be.

Only going to get worse unless a new platform/network/protocol is created for the future of "trustless" news and publications.

You only don't believe it because you lack the imagination to build it.

Which is the case for everyone but the person who does.

Unfortunately, that person may have killed himself because of JStor.

Ultimately, you apply modalities not concepts which explains why you can't see it.

Email doesn't need to be email it only needs to provide equal or greater utility.

Been using Brave for about 2 years now and here's the deal with BAT, Advertisers and Privacy.

As soon as you offer quid-pro-quo exhanges involving digital assets you open the door to the SEC/IRS. With even a modicum of success in market share Brave risks opening the door to the two most openly privacy smashing bureaucracies in financial history.

Brave can lament all they want but in the end digital assets will come to heel and SOX/Dodd Frank still stand.

All the trappings of an intellectual. Yet none of the critical thinking skills.

Someone convinced you citation > opinion.

That was wrong.

LOL

Yes, thats what congress is for in the legislative branch. In the executive branch the EC provides that function.

You're forgetting that we are Constitutionally allowed 1 congress rep per 30k. Right now it's at 1 per 790k. Thats already demagogue territory.

Also, forgetting the 17th Amendment and the original intent of Senators.

You have a very narrow way of rationalizing the destruction of an actual bulwark against tyranny.

A world that moves faster is absolutely the original intent of the EC which is more essential now than ever before.

Rule by a demagogue is the primary weakness of a democracy and it's a pretty bad one at that.

It's that damn straw lobby that's driven is to this point.

This is a boatload of pop culture brainwashed hullabaloo spewed by a foreigner.

The basis of the American work ethic is in dreaming. Clearly, you've chosen to disregard the centuries of European, African, Oriental and S./Central American slavery, ritual sacrifice, imperialism and almost constant war and subjugation.

But, you know - the intentional racism instilled by the English must be the lingering driver of American commerce and ambition.

No he isn't and he won't.

But, it's a good social engineering mechanism to discuss these issues so the next gen and others who don't understand the US thanks to pop culture can learn why the EC is important.

Repeal the 17th Amendment while you're at it and then increase the house reps to 5000 and triple the senators.

Then we'll see how effective or profitable lobbying, campaign finance or gerrymandering is.

You're welcome to research and learn - I suggest you start with hydroxyl radicals.

Asking for citation in a world of counter examples and studies is a little technocratic. Maybe just logic and learn it.

Oh! The one that found success with the Laffer Curve. Right.

Freedom isn't an idea. It's an actual place. In terms of kingdoms a free peoples kingdom is a Freedom; and you don't have to pay someone for the right to exist.

Oddly enough we agree, there is a faction in the US pursuing its own agenda.

Interesting. A faction you say? You mean like the faction that drafted the Articles of Confederation?

Good point, I wonder how many times states have suspended taxes on gasoline during such times.

Would be surprised if it was any.

What a pedestrian response.

Except methane is the cause and intentionally so as it will dissapate in less than a decade but make it appear as if the world is warming more quickly than estimated.

It's a trick and people eat this shit up hook line and ignorant sinker.

You focused on the wrong thing. It's not about exhaling carbon, or as you originally stated, "producing" CO2. It's about the absorption of Oxygen.

Consider a popular idea, that planting 1 trillion trees to scrub carbon through transpiration, I assume you're familiar with it, is given real credence as a solition to heterogenic climate change then why are you so quick to dismiss the notion that humans doing the exact same thing by breathing isn't an aspect of the problem of increasing CO2 PPM?

My argument, was if the article is all about human population booms ending and thus with it Capitalism, and the author still only correlates economic activity to increasing climate danger then its irresponsible and uninformed. Undermining the entire premise of the article.

"The idea that humans breathing produces enough carbon to affect climate change seems..."

That's because that's not the idea. You don't even understand the argument. What you linked adds zero value to your argument, and the cows/agriculture bit only supports mine.

Do you write down and reason out what you're saying or just type as the ego-filtered justifications come to you?

"To ward off concerns over margins, Amazon is offering SBA sellers a minimum gross proceed — which guarantees set profit for sellers based on a set selling price, even if Amazon lowers the price — for each product. The catch: Amazon wrote in its FAQ about SBA that MGP would be revisited “typically once every six months,” and that brands would have seven days to accept the new MGP, or reject it and deactivate a product from SBA."

This is literally price fixing.

Furthermore, Amazon hasn't lowered the price of anything not already in-process of technological price changes (like e-readers); if prices are lower it's because the margins shrank, the quality was reduced or the overall tech advanced without Amazons help.

Since they've earned literally half of their past 12 years of Net Income in 2018 alone, it's difficult to reason how they have cut the cost of anything while not making money, nor producing products through greater economies of scale than existing suppliers, while acquiring billions upon billions worth of logistics assets, another billions upon billions of business subsidiaries, and somehow had enough free cash flow to create robots, pay decent wages (even for shitty work environments) and still provide Jeff Bezos with enough money to buy almost equal number of businesses under the Bezos Expedition banner.

Amazon is a fraud, Jeff was a VP on Wall Street before he became a fake ass tech guru, and he and his cronies have been pumping up the stock price fraudulently as a means of providing cash through the sale of treasury stock and because interest rates have been so low since the financial crisis that investors will let them.

This article doesn't describe Emotional Intelligence. It describes what we perceive as maturity. They are not the same thing.

Yup, this fake corporate and civil socialism implemented by FDR and LBJ through farcical social "advancements" and the culling of our rights to live free (meaning not taxed by virtue of being born - Federal Reserve Act) and to choose our local politics over Federal infringement (17th amendment) is very much like the racist Uncle Tom days of plantations. Utterly laughable considering the self delluded state "Liberals" believe themselves to live in.

Slaves outnumbered Slavers scores to 1, and it wasn't the guns that kept them in check - it was psychology.

Racism is psychological and the people who convinced you Socialism is the way are the same ones looking to short circuit the capitalist system that allowed them to advance. Cause that's how you win this game of thrones, by being the only one who gets to choose.