RobinUS2

Sounds a bit farfetched, not like they wouldn't hear it later?

how does this work?

How are we going to provide that evidence? And make sure that evidence is actually true, instead of AI generated? Send them a link to a wiki page that has been mutated by an AI bot updating it? ;-)

Reading a bit it seems to be potentially that the recommendations after the last big quake haven't been followed up properly. So basically stronger building requirements, with government validation was the plan; in reality not done (properly) and "checked" by paid companies.

In the case of protests etc I'd understand the goal behind it from certain actors involved, but why in this case?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

I understand your point, but CloudFlare generally is very transparent, including root cause analysis and their CTO reaching out directly. It could also be a mistake or not so well thought about instead of assuming bad intentions.

is it just DNS?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-faltstrom-base45/

Where should the primary responsibility for product market fit lie within a startup? E.g. product owner, CTO, CEO, .. ?

generally lookup the IPs (dig <hostname>) and then attempt a host/whois on that IP. For PushBullet it's hidden by CloudFlare so hard to see easily, you should try and find an exposed endpoint (which they haven't if they've done well).

this one appears to be just global LBs, so a load balancer in AWS/Azure that hits the actual backends over a VPN or something would have worked, but that's just this case

Having same issues

Wouldn't it be an option to basically chain the "events" in the local storage queue with crytographic hashes (kind a like a block chain). You can then fairly easily verify modifications somewhere in the list of events.

It wouldn't make it entirely impossible, but much more complicated.

Are there any banks actually using this? Or is it more like a suggested spec draft?

Totally agree, except for the fact that email is a secure medium. Phone would be much better.

Likewise, it simply makes sense if you have a proper understanding of channels and go-routines.

Then there's also the North-Korean airspace, which is maybe even more aggressive. Could also match the flight path (give or take).

An autopilot can perform an instrument landing, however this does require some preparation of the flight crew (e.g. setting the right frequencies for ILS, reducing airspeed, deploy landing-gear, flaps, apply brakes + thrust reversers).

So simply guiding it to the nearest (suitable) airport would not make a big difference.

Located in The Netherlands, but mainly doing business with US/UK. I go on one holiday for an extend period (~ 14 days) and a couple (~ 2) of short 3-5 day trips.

Yes definitely. I personally see this as a key ingredient in order to make a project really work. Of course this doesn't work for things like an X-Ray machine, but for a SaaS company like CloudPelican it does.

We currently use it to investigate root-causes of disruptions, track down bugs in the development and staging environment, and most important: monitor our entire infrastructure. This is also in line with our company vision that should allow users to have a single overview on their entire stack of servers, websites and applications. This will reduce time spent on digging through log files, switching between lots of fragmented SaaS tools, et cetera.

CloudFlare also takes of the load of your dead server if the server is dead. It still has a "Try the original server"-button, but that is more manual.

Highly unlikely. Probably it will hit some kind of max post size in the webserver. However 128 characters is nowhere near 1GB. I think the gap is quite significant.

Great initiative, I personally prefer to refer to this as "Eat your own sh*t".

My best guess would be that your domain has been used before? I also get lots of requests on my domains to files that are long gone (couple of years).