Really? You cannot imagine any scenario where employment approaches zero other than the robotic-utopia scenario? We have no historical example of employment approaching double digits without societal problems ensuing? The higher the unemployment, the closer to robo-utopia, in a smooth, monotonic fashion, right?
HN user
ReverendBayes
I almost choked on my lunch laughing after re-reading that. I remember reading the original thread and actually agreeing with him, without the slightest chuckle. Im amazed at how most people still find it hard to find pictures in their filesystems on their pcs. But think about it, how many people carry .jpg, .jpeg, .png etc file associations in their heads? Hilarious.
If we have fusion in 30 years instead of 60 years, we have colonization of the solar system happening in our lifetimes. We'd have the economic rationale for removing all military engagement in the middle east. We have 30*380 billion on petro cost savings here in the U.S: http://www.fuelfreedom.org/the-real-foreign-oil-problem/oil-... God knows how much CO2 we remove from the atmosphere. 100 billion sounds cheap to me.
Have you ever programmed anything substantial using java outside the enterprise/agile IT environment? Any type of project on your own time? Have you every built anything in Ruby, Python, or Go? I'm asking to try to discern what you mean by "more viable".
Wrong, by about a standard deviation. The mean iq of the Ashkenazi is about 113, the average for a very good nurse or less than average accountant. Of course, that mean deviation is still statistically significant enough to show a disproportion of outliers of extrema of a normal distribution. Just get your numbers straight before making statements about the matter.
Was Bronx Science like this? It seems to me that the tech track magnets would be a little more enlightened, but I could be wrong.
I'm with you. Just warm up the starcraft!
How many of those are getting warmer, gibsonf1? :), couldn't resist.
Uh, guess you didn't get it (no, not the book).
I wish people would lay off him. Look, for the last time, Bush is not President anymore. Next we'll be going over his alchoholism and business failings in his 30s.
Leave him be, please.
Allowing that both are real is incorrect, even as they define themselves. Christianity and Judaism, by identity, allow only one of them to be real, if real is defined by correspondence with existence.
I think the comment above calls into question the merit of your friends achievement, which will always be the result of affirmative action programs.
How can you say that? Do you know her or what she is capable of? It seems pure idiocy to me to suggest that every woman graduating from a premier science program is never achieving it through merit.
As far as bell curves and distributions, who the hell knows? People tried to predict housing prices and stock portfolios on gaussians, and they seem to work until they don't. You cannot project your platonic ideal of how you think the world works because it seems to and then handwave on outliers.
If they pay for it within those fifteen minutes, that is all that matters.
At some point, a man, regardless of his convictions, has to stop getting into arguments with reality.
Bread and circuses it is, then.
Because there is no way a woman could be that smart, is there? Oh... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_vos_Savant
She must have the longest ring finger on the planet, yeah, that's it.
I'll trade you some of my stock certificates for some of your green pieces of....
Possibly the stupidest non sequitur I have read here in a while. You're joking, right?
Not a web connection or mag subscription among the lot of them, eh?
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/index.php?name=News&file=a... http://www.forbes.com/2005/02/21/cz_0221oxan_default.html http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/...
Google could end this now with a nationwide wimax buildout. Build a skype-like voice protocol on the android stack, open source a reference hardware design, and let programmers planetwide innovate on the platform. Would fell the iphone and every other carrier within a year or two.
The cultural values of the respondents are measured by their responses to a question on the values parents would most like in their children.
This is not controlling for values taken as a given, as it is worded as most like. E.g., if my son excels in soccer there would be no desire on my part for increased aptitude in sports.
showed that only IQ had predictive value when pitted against values theories.
How you control for values? If I value taking peoples money by force because I feel like it my intelligence will negate that values effect on my life outcome?
Apple is evil and in severe need of competition in this space. May Android provide it.
Ok, how about expounding this way: Unevidenced, unfalsifiable hypothesis presented as an explanation, with all the rigor of an armchair Olympics viewer armed with a 6 pack. Lame.