Petersipoi

Did you not read the comment thread you're responding to?

AI model inspects hundreds of thousands of scientific images. A job that previously took an expert roughly a month can now be completed in around 15 minutes.

Why not? Seems like a cop out.

Being able to ask questions to small open models seems.... obviously useful?

As someone on the Apple beta.. the model is almost completely irrelevant to the experience. Apple has gone and done Apple things by nerfing the experience so completely that almost any model in the past year would be fine. I still reach for ChatGPT/Claude/Grok constantly instead of the AI toy that Apple calls the new Siri.

Nothing you said here can't be applied to literally any company on earth. And nothing you said here is even a new concern.

People have been saying this since GPT-1. This idea that we can only squeeze a little bit more of intelligence out of LLMs isn't a new one. And thus far, it has always been wrong.

Even if your outburst was true, yes.. If your government turns rogue it's better to have 2 options than 1. Period.

As opposed to the incredible code that humans are known to write...

Why lol? Because you don't like Elon? XAI has continued to stay within a few months of leading edge, and now suddenly they'll just never do it again, despite doing it literally today?

On the contrary, that is what happens if I use Claude

This comment says more about your misunderstanding of the world than anything about X

People will truly justify anything. My god. We can't even hold governments accountable for waste because people will bend over backwards to justify any amount of spending.

It's funny how "trump" dwarfs just about any other term. Truly a hacker forum.

So many people on HN don't understand coding with AI at all. I honestly think they just haven't done it. AI does not take the grind out of coding. Plain and simple. I've been working on a project in the evening for months with AI. Yet there are people on HN that think one-shotting a pong game is the same thing.

don't want to be struck by anything i didn't hear coming

Airpods Pro with transparency mode is the best for this

If the claim is true that Claude values white people less than other races, then yes.

Any other softball questions?

Sprinting requires significantly different physical form than just bigger motors. I do not accept the claim that humans couldn't possibly make bipedal robots that can reliably walk without being able to sprint. That's absurd.

No, it's a test of how good an AI is at completing this given task. You can't extrapolate beyond that, and that is what makes this article so annoying. Grok got good at the task that was given. That doesn't mean that Grok is going to use the same strategy if given an entirely different task. Grok obviously didn't need collaboration to win, as made evident by the fact that it won without collaboration. Anyone who is claiming that Grok wouldn't collaborate if it was beneficial is just guessing.

You're mistaking a CEO claiming layoffs are a result of AI with layoffs actually being a result of AI.

In other words, if I were a CEO that needed to do layoffs, I'd blame them on AI. Because why the fuck wouldn't I? It's practically a get out of jail free card right now. The big bad AI is the villain, not me!

Because if you call something a right, then anyone who disagrees with you is a fascist. It's simple.

What?

You want Apple to anonymize a users data, then hand that users data to a third party who knows who the user is? I don't think PCC is doing what you think it's doing.

If you're trying to remember passwords, you're already doing it wrong

published by the British media company the Economist Group

Haha, it's literally the first sentence of the Wikipedia page. That's fucking funny. Try again.

Sure but like.. come on. Is that really a defense? Most packages are run on devs machines. And it's not like "Oh it's just running on my production server, what could go wrong there" is any better.

Your very sarcastic, uninteresting comment getting downvoted is not an indication that forum isn't intellectual. It's an indication that you aren't behaving intellectually.

Deepseek proper is the only provider offering Deepseek V4 Pro at such an insanely low price. All the other providers are like 5x.

If someone says they're using Deepseek, it's probably a safe bet that they're sending money to China. People choose an inferior model (Deepseek) because it's cheaper. Not many people are willing to use Deepseek but also pay the 5x price to have an American company run it for them.

But in any event, Porsche sold more cars in 2025 in North America, than any year prior.

Porsche sells about as many cars every year as Ferarri has sold in its entire existence. I'm not sure that's a strong indicator of whether or not it "brand" (AKA public perception) is doing well or not. Clearly Ferarri has a strong brand than Porsche, despite only selling 330,000 cars in the past 80 years. And despite Porsche selling 310,000 in 2024 alone.

Yes they have very different business models. But it would be like using "number of Window's licenses sold" to argue that Microsoft has a really strong brand right now.

You think ultra rich housewives don't want ultra expensive cars?

They legitimately expect this thing to sell to its target audience.

"Selling" is not an issue that Ferrari has. Of course this thing will sell. They produce so few cars that every car they make will sell.

Whether it will help or hurt their brand in the long run is a much more interesting and important question.

I'm quite sure that the American models have been fine-tuned for certain leanings and world views