NooneAtAll3

Thank you. So they are essentially a protection against spurious errors, cool

I don't quite understand the point about order of operations - does it do normalization after every such filter pass? why not leave it to the end?

also: what is top_a? I saw it being mentioned in the GP link

it's a high signal headline

the article itself is worthless, and nobody in the comments seem to even interact with its content, you included

I'm reminded of space race, where US built centralized planning, while USSR did competition between construction buros

where can one learn what top_k and top_p mean?

...what is public school then?

what's the deal with empty half-a-page-of-text posts lately?

is this like the ultimate form of "headline is all you need"?

I came here wanting to see after-action-report of someone actually using Ai or wtvr for reverse-engineering. Instead I got "I heard it was so. The end"

primer (https://github.com/rochus-keller/MUMPS/blob/main/docs/MUMPS_...) is an interesting read

I wish someone made something similar for Forth. Too many times I encountered something explained about forth that itself needed explanation for operators

They are only visible when they are spinning up to orbit

and are extremely easy to remove with the most basic of outlier rejection techniques; netizens often amplifiy outliers by max-stacking instead of outlier-rejected mean-stacking to make Starlink look much worse than it is

my understanding was that they are a problem on much bigger scale than yours "one dude with mobile telescope (or maybe just a camera?)"

sure, we don't have many film observatories anymore (where max-stacking is literally only thing they can do), but a lot of lower-to-medium scale observatories get polluted observations with not enough funding to clean up easily or too small FoV for cleanup to matter - frame gets ruined, observation needs to be longer for effect

I don't understand the premise in the beginning

how is running servers supposed to be 0 cost, while running ai inferrence isn't?

you might be confusing 2 variable case (which indeed was tested to 150+ degree) and 3 variable case (this counterexample)

is the difference between MD5 and MD5crypt the same as between Java and Javascript or are they actually related somehow?

my experience with reddit has been much more about its politization rather than anything about quality

"my side is right, the other is wrong" - has been too common of an occurrence, both in comments but also in posts and such frontpages as /r/all

1-trit*

I remember someone training smart kettle to use its speaker as microphone

Regarding the benchmarks linked by you, they do not seem so bad as they really are only because they are not compared with x86 CPUs or with any ARM CPU more recent than the 10-year old and obsolete Cortex-A72, which is many times slower than modern ARM CPU cores

"why do you compare 15y.o. chess GM against 15y.o. Carlsen instead of world champion he is today? if you do you'll see how pathetic performance actually is"

everything gets a weight category. immature architecture gets benched against immature state of architecture. narrow OoO gets compared against narrow OoO

check in 4 more years for results closer to frontline - but where we are, theoretical worries did not come to pass

taking architecture that explicitly removed carry flag for performance and then trying to to emulate carry flag anyway was stupid in 2021 and is still stupid today

even on x64 you get better performance when you don't use carry flag and just use limbs https://www.chosenplaintext.ca/articles/radix-2-51-trick.htm... - risc-v is even more so

and experimentally gmp bench results show performance in line with arm https://old.reddit.com/r/RISCV/comments/1jsnbdr/gnu_mp_bignu... so panic was for nothing

risc-v has no flags period

modern out-of-order execution gets hindered by such non-parallel cpu state, so it wasn't included

and Earth's rotation was too fast for last several years

we were all waiting for the negative leap second to finally happen - but cowards got too afraid

we were ought to insert a negative leap second, but cowards got too afraid it would break code

I can understand the clock running out meaning a loss - but I still want to play the rest of the words? how do I do that? I don't think they are accessible anymore

RAM is literally copy-paste of the same circuit over and over, you're trying to compare cost to produce million AK-47 with 1 carrier

and cost per transistor stopped decreasing at ~20-30nm, now small nodes are targetting energy efficiency (and thus performance, since heat is the main limiter)

it's not corruption that dictates who gets caught - it's power balance

crying about oppression only leaves you stuck in "everyone steals" state

I thought this was going to be about computing (a+b)/2 avoiding overflows

reminds me of Word's autocorrect being turing-complete https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlX_pThh7z8 (3:57, but whole video is fun)

my screen too short vertically - I didn't realize there's a whole half of the game hidden from me

so 200$

how much did Ai cost for you?

San Marino: 1 install

I feel like there's a problem in privacy in this dataset...

Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).

...why did they make a website not html-first?

again, you're approaching it from perspective "both sides get caught" being a possibility

when in actuality the choice is between "both sides steal" or "one side steals"

and allowing both sides to steal is in no way better

---

the main way desired "both sides get caught" state becomes a thing is after "one side" splits in two - still being close in horizontal connections to stabilize, but with developed instruments for either half to guard against the other