Thanks -- this will help out a LOT in copyright infringement cases!
HN user
NicoleJO
Developer behind the First Draft Fiction and Non-Fiction Content Generator http://www.justoutsourcing.com
If you knew anything about art, you'd know nobody wants a billion-fingered freak plastered across their chest!
Poisoned with plagiarized content.
ChatGPT Stole Your Work. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-generative-artificial-in...
Yeah, it would be great if people followed the law instead of being digital thieves.
But you know...
Goals.
ChatGPT stole from everyone, dude. So just stop.
https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-generative-artificial-in...
Don't be stupid. This is no where near the same thing.
How does ChatGPT plagiarize?
ChatGPT plagiarizes by copying other people's work. It does this by storing what it reads from people and conversations, and then using it. Basically, ChatGPT looks for ways to copy and paste other people's substance and present it as its own. It does this by grabbing text from all kinds of places, such as websites, books, and articles, and then using those words to create something new. In other words, ChatGPT has a large database stored with words, sentences and phrases that it can use to create its own work, which can sound like it was written by a human.
Every damn one of them. ChatGPT plagiarizes.
https://justoutsourcing.blogspot.com/2022/03/gpts-plagiarism...
Copyrighted content is not eligible for non-authorized reproduction.
Are people here so used to pirating that they no longer know what the laws are???
All plagiarized and non-copyrightable.
What a shame.
Both of those books are copyrighted. Why are you illegally sharing them?
The company that made ChatGPT is being sued for global copyright infringement. Why the hell would I reward them for that???
Told you.
What does deanonymize mean?
Disgusting behavior.
We are actively iterating on our data cleaning to deanonymize any user information.
You're actively trying to doxx people?
Do you have any idea what the words you're using even mean??
Oh, and don't bother responding to me again.
I won't answer.
Congratulations! You're WRONG AGAIN! LoL
It's not my lawsuit :-)
That's proof that this "programmer" is foolishly using scraped content as a dataset.
If you found that, you'll find all sorts of private information in there.
This post should be taken down.
The project is a security risk.
This person had ample opportunity to answer the question. But he didn't, just like the other thieves who don't answer questions about the legality of their datasets.
It's a pattern.
It sure beats being stupid enough to leave a trail of self-incriminating evidence all over social media.
(You're not as smart as you think you are.)
There's no GPT in my software, nor does it work like it.
Anything else you care to be wrong about?
He won't answer because he's following OpenAI's criminal footsteps.
Dumbest take I've ever seen. Congratulations.
Step number 1 is already the first problem.
The company that makes stablediffusion is being sued for copyright infringement. Don't use this.
All the images here were stolen from artists who were not credited nor paid for their graphics.
Here's a link to the case itself so you won't have to guess about anything. https://githubcopilotinvestigation.com/
There is no difference, which is why this lawsuit won't be the only one