NeoInHacker

so what their model may looks like?

I'm working on the wolrd model action (WMA) model, which is used to replace Visual Language Action (VLA) model to bridge the physical world with LLM.

Now I've done my basic researching part, but I'm lack of the courage to dive into this topic. After all, it's a really hard work to it.

So I'm just, you know, scrolling the HN and trying to sharpen my brain and get back to the work.

sounds "it's okey" ?

China: You are welcome

yeah, it's lame

Yeah, so I think high density informational materials can save one from this feeling. And the measurement of the "interesting degree" it how many information can it provide.

What's app? WeChat?

What's app？WeChat？

Why diffusion LLMs' performance cannot beat Auto Regressive LLM now?

Yeah, It’s true that PDEs are the "top-tier tool" for describing physical phenomena—from the laws of motion in classical mechanics and electromagnetic waves in electromagnetism to the evolution of wave functions in quantum mechanics, they accurately model most macroscopic, classical scenarios. However, when it comes to covering all physical phenomena, they really "fall short": in quantum gravity, spacetime may be discontinuous, making the concept of differentiation meaningless; for complex systems like turbulence, PDEs cannot be solved nor can they capture macroscopic laws; even for the randomness of quantum measurements, PDEs can only predict probability distributions and fail to explain the underlying nature. In short, they are a "top-tier auxiliary," but by no means a "one-size-fits-all key."

Seems great, but hard to be used