No it's not. You do want your vendors to make money working with you. That way they are incentivized to help.
HN user
Msw242
Get a lockbox at the bank
Yeah, absolutely
E.g. doordash drivers are clearly X, and engineering teams are usually Y
Metal usually has a plastic coating though, doesn't it?
How many rockets were they launching 10k years ago?
More people is more good
This is what could rescue traditional media if they play their cards right.
Hahaha haha no
Their hallucinations are worse than ChatGPT's
I don't want to live in a world where I have to track down and personally inspect the factories and farms that produce my food.
If I deposit cash at a member bank that the government says is compliant with their rules and regulations, that should not imply any risk taking on my side.
If I use a payroll provider like rippling that uses SVB as their payment rails, I shouldn't have to worry about that.
If I use a service that goes under because they can't fund payroll because of a banking supply chain issue, that seems rather hard to due diligence.
If you honestly hold that position, I suggest you get a little bit of empathy for decision-makers. It will make you a better member of society.
They just want to blame the users
Nobody is calling for bailing out the shareholders in SVB dude. Only depositors.
You're going after a strawman.
What consumers personally and positively identify as "consumers"?
I don't see how this landing page speaks to "consumers"
It's also super jargony.
36% increase inbetween generations is absolutely massive though
Prior steps were about 10% or less.
Ah yes, so that we can have graduates get B.S. in BS
You're thinking about this policy area incorrectly
The 1% win no matter how we design the housing market. They don't need to thumb the scale
I see the same thing. Meanwhile watching offshore salaries go up up up month after month for senior devs (5+ yrs xp)
Ironically the top 1% don't have enough votes to block relaxed zoning, which would enable developers to bring more supply to your market
I'm not an engineer, so it's possible there are engineers in my company copying and pasting from stack overflow
Although we have a type system so they are probably adjusting things to fit
But none of our supply chain has restrictive licenses attached, and good faith errors are usually easy to correct way before they go to trial
I know because I have had to sign off on using worse packages when our use case doesn't comply with the license on the best in class package
Not every single startup.
It's not hard to read the licenses, and I have a fiduciary duty not to open up my company to unnecessary liability
How many of these VCs used their reputations to pump shit coins (which they got along with equity when they invested in these Ponzis) then sold the shit coins to retail investors?
Seems like they sold unregulated securities
I can't renew my driver's license online anymore until I prove my citizenship.
Alright, fine, I have my birth certificate, and I took it to the DPS.
Well I can't just walk in... I have to make an appointment online. Alright, fine...
But appointments are booked solid for 2 months.
So I guess I'm driving with an expired license until then.
But the birds don't run this city. We do.
97.7% of tokens launched in Uniswap were scams or rug pulls so far
I have to scroll to watch the video?
Just like with cyberpunk 2077, my question is, "where are the flying cars!?"
The frustration you're feeling is that, no matter how obvious the tone or implication, advocates will never acknowledge that it is real because what you are describing is a phenomenon that cannot exist.
It's gaslighting.
hilariously, it is because of increasing regulation that users will need to upload more sensitive data to more services.
Even requesting to delete your data in the EU requires the submission of sensitive data in order to verify your identity and fulfill the request.
It's important to look out for yourself and your career
I'm a founder at a small company, and the current environment has us stagnating a bit
My biggest fear is that our best contributors go elsewhere because we aren't able to fully enable their growth here right now
I've lucked out in terms of how loyal my team is, but loyalty only goes so far, and the business has an obligation to enable the careers of it's contributors
Basically just saying, there are two sides to every deal and if you're not thriving due to environment, you have a responsibility to yourself to find an environment where you will thrive
Fire them. The other employees will get pissed if you don't.
Everybody already knows they aren't doing any work.
Because raising prices doesn't necessarily increase revenue.
What do you do when you find out that you make more per ad-tier user than you do for ad-free user[0]?
The incentives go in the wrong direction from a UX perspective
[0] https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/hulu-makes-about-15-in-reven...
China is planning at least 150 new reactors in the next 15 years, more than the rest of the world has built in the past 35.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-11-02/china-cli...