MrBunny

Funny bloomberg just made a video about this mine. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2017-08-18/bitcoin-s-r...

So the real issue here is the lack of in person face to face? Which is the continued argument that adults/college students don’t know how to handle social interactions with tech. Is it possible adults/college students don’t know how to handle social interaction with tech around because their exposure was much later in life? Is the lesson these kids learning even more important? How to hold on to humanity in the face of technology. Or possibly humanity and tech has entirely different direction and we are just trying to fight it all together.

so would it be safe to assume every planet/moon should have some amount of water? In one form or another. Should it be less of a surprise?

I think its all about competition and the level of challenge a game has that makes people more aggressive. However I think the aggression fades very quickly.

I play a lot of games. Two games right now fight for my attention HOTS and Mad Max. I actually had to take a break from HOTS this weekend because I had gotten into argument with a friend over a stupid play. So I switched to Mad Max and kind of washed away my anger. Mad Max is not a very frustrating game has just enough challenge for me to stay interested.

With that all said in most cases just breaking from the activity after several minutes I will be back to normal.

I would be interested to find out what the product was and how it evolved over time.

http://www.kongregate.com/idle-games, a bunch of the idle games submitted to Kongregate. Not sure when it all started but in like last year kong recognized it as its own genre. However the kitten game seems to be a bit more complex than a lot of the ones kongregate is hosting.

Why are we so focused on having only one solution for energy? I would understand the cost would decrease when you put all your eggs in one basket but can we really find one type of energy source that has no disadvantages? Wouldn't we be better served with diversity of energy production (more than we have now)?

No worries I took no offense.

I actually have changed my diet and take drugs that help prevent more events. Additionally its really hard to track the progression since you can have an event (damage) without actually knowing (mild issues). However the damage is there and IMO is what produce the most day to day trouble. Tricking your brain into thinking your feet are on fire or your arm is weak weird shit like that. When I finally got MRI they found 7+ lesions in the brain and spine. For me to be honest most days I'm ok but it really sucks take these crazy expensive drugs every day. It's a very expensive disease that produces lasting damage even if a cure is to found.

Sorry don't mean to rant.

So I have MS. I go to any link that has to do with the Immune system. Recently I see tons of "discoveries" and attempts to link it to MS. Which gets me excited but than I start to think how much of this is truth and how much is bullshit? Or that MS and others like it are so complex that all of the findings are true... Either way starting to have a hard time finding hope in any of these articles.

Would it be possible for her to have 2 accounts? One for paid stuff and one for free? Or would that mess with the content id stuff?