But it needs more space to maneuver, a mostly flat ground, can't step over anything... It's simpler but less adaptable
HN user
Miraltar
They won the process, got re-hired and given full control. Krafton isn't listed anymore as publisher on the steam page.
Post you mentioned (Most of What You Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People): https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/9rvroo/most...
Women would feel less safe yes but there is no evidence that crime and road accidents would increase.
I personally dislike all lowercase, to me it feels like not greeting someone but I don't get GP's argument either.
The article is a bullet point, yes, but some items have multiple sentences with no caps
Bay Area Rapid Transit?
Citing Valve as a model for handling cheating is not what I'd have reached for.
Plate waste is roughly a third of total food waste apparently.
They make a distinction between plate waste which was served then trashed and total food waste. Plate waste is roughly a third apparently.
The most successful animal by what metric?
Instead or in addition to following blogs, what I'd love to have is a way to filter out those I don't like.
Well, if you're supposed to administrate shocks to teach or test someone's memory, asking the question while they're screaming isn't just about protocol, it does break down the purpose of these shocks. Saying that participants did administrate shocks because they trusted the legitimacy of what they thought they were doing doesn't hold up under these circumstances.
HAL is decidedly second-tier. Given the option, everyone would pick arXiv over HAL.
Can you elaborate on that?
Guidelines say "please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait" in that case I'd argue that it's linkbait so changing it is justified
Create some sort of score that goes up when a "child" misbehaves. The further the child the lower the increase but at some point you get banned anyway
Your detector did not work well on an AI-collab writing fiction project I did a while ago, tagged it as 100% human even with high confidence for the most part. But to be fair, most detectors weren't significantly better, although this one gave a justification that made sense https://aidetector.com/
Stopped reading there: "This model (Moshi) could [...] recite an original poem in a French accent (research shows poems sound better this way)."
Is it still true today?
I'm guessing they used the same argument that was made for calculators, printing... By lessening the burden on your brain you weaken it.
I think it's fine when you're just working on your own but if you have to review code or work in a codebase you don't own that's much more effort.
That's not really what's said. If you regularly change languages and some are supported and some are not, switching to unsupported languages will be very unpleasant. Having to switch editor/install plugins/customize can be tedious.
Yup, three years of fighting on "correct" use of words. Maybe someday people will accept that LLMs do "hallucinate" even tho it's not the same "hallucinate" as for humans.
Agreed, the original title is better (and typo free) although a bit long.
H-Neurons: On the Existence, Impact, and Origin of Hallucination-Associated Neurons in LLMs
Keep in mind that not everyone on the internet uses English as their first language and they might use words weirdly cause it resembles what they're used to
if you do not have enough grip, you may unfortunately spill the coffee on the floor. If you don't have enough grip while doing a sharp turn, it could be literally fatal. As a result, it is wise for the absolute majority of people in high-risk situations to exert more power than necessary. The energy investments are small, but changes in probabilities are significant.
Yes but there's still a sweet spot to find, you're not gripping your cup or your wheel as hard as you can. Over-gripping in uncertain conditions can be good but only to a certain extent.
I still agree with you though, a good example of this is climbing stairs — if you have strong legs it's much less effort to go 2 by 2 but I'd never tell someone struggling to do that, it would make no sense.
Delegating life decisions to AI is obviously quite stupid but it can really help lay out and question your thoughts even if it's obviously biased.
You're doing it the wrong way imo, if you ask gpt to improve a sentence that's already very polished it will only add grandiosity because what else it could do? For a proper comparison you'd have to give it the most raw form of the thought and see how it would phrase it.
The main difference in the author's writing to LLM I see is that the flourish and the structure mentioned is used meaningfully, they circle around a bit too much for my taste but it's not nearly as boring as reading ai slop which usually stretch a simple idea over several paragraphs
Exactly as discussed in Sebastian Lague's video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGk0rnyTa1U
It doesn't say that gpt is better, just that it is more popular
We move a lot more than we used to. Not so long ago you generally didn't need internet to keep in touch because 50 years later your childhood friend would still live 10km away