HN user

ManWith2Plans

314 karma
Posts34
Comments38
View on HN
typekro.run 2mo ago

TypeKro: Write TypeScript. Deploy Kubernetes

ManWith2Plans
7pts0
github.com 4mo ago

Open-artisan: OpenCode plugin for structured AI workflow orchestration

ManWith2Plans
3pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 10mo ago

TypeKro: A control plane aware tool to orchestrate K8s resources in TypeScript

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
typekro.run 10mo ago

Show HN: TypeKro – TypeScript infra-as-code for Kubernetes built on KRO

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 1y ago

A Tale of ECS Service Stability

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 1y ago

Gambling with Language Models

ManWith2Plans
3pts1
github.com 2y ago

Unpkg CDN down causing dependent website outages

ManWith2Plans
40pts37
twitter.com 3y ago

Watch AI platform design and build a distributed platform on AWS from scratch

ManWith2Plans
3pts0
www.eventual.ai 3y ago

Eventual AI: Business Requirements –> Distributed Cloud Software Using LLMs

ManWith2Plans
3pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Exploring the Emerging Cloud Development Tooling Landscape

ManWith2Plans
1pts1
github.com 3y ago

OpenChatKit: Base to create both specialized and general purpose chatbots

ManWith2Plans
3pts0
www.clouddatainsights.com 3y ago

The Value Proposition of EventBridge Pipes

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Organizing and Integrating Distributed Processes with AWS

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Re: Re:Invent 2022 – Reflections on my first AWS re:Invent

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Items on my Re:Invent 2022 Wishlist

ManWith2Plans
3pts1
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

VPC @ Edge is an important and missing AWS Feature

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

A comprehensive guide to communication in distributed systems with AWS

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Wanted: A serverless solution to exchange IAM access for access to VPC resources

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Can we get security groups rule references that extend across transit gateways

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

What would make AWS even better

ManWith2Plans
28pts68
www.youtube.com 3y ago

Serving Netflix Video at 400Gbps on FreeBSD by Drew Gallatin [video]

ManWith2Plans
3pts1
yehudacohen.substack.com 3y ago

Azure Kicked My Butt

ManWith2Plans
2pts1
yehudacohen.substack.com 4y ago

A quick overview of AWS principals and policies

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
news.ycombinator.com 4y ago

Ask HN: Can someone recommend a more stable alternative to GitHub Actions?

ManWith2Plans
1pts2
yehudacohen.substack.com 4y ago

Monitoring Shard Allocation in OpenSearch and Elasticsearch

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 4y ago

An OpenSearch Service Ghost Story

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 5y ago

Exposing dockerfile content to an EFS volume in Fargate 1.4.0

ManWith2Plans
3pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 5y ago

Running ECS on CIS Hardened Amazon Linux

ManWith2Plans
1pts0
yehudacohen.substack.com 5y ago

Fixing AWS Sagemaker SDK and frustrating open source contribution experiences

ManWith2Plans
2pts0
www.nbcnews.com 5y ago

Facial recognition technology sends black man to jail for crime he didn't commit

ManWith2Plans
8pts1

I've been busy building and dogfooding open-artisan for my own development purposes. I've diverged quite a bit from main and am hoping to merge some of those changes back soon. It's basically an OpenCode plugin that forces open-code token-hungry state machine that tries to map the engineering process I follow, exposing only valid tools and states at every step of development. If you're interested, in following along or trying it out, it's available here:

https://github.com/yehudacohen/open-artisan/

Hopefully, I'll merge in my large structural changes in the next couple of weeks. These structural changes will enhance the state machine meaningfully, as well as adding support for hermes agenet.

I agree with this to some degree. Agents often stub and take shortcuts during implementation. I've been working on this problem a little bit with open-artisan which I published yesterday (https://github.com/yehudacohen/open-artisan).

Rather than having agents decide to manage their own code lifecycle, define a state machine where code moves from agent to agent and isolated agents critique each others code until the code produced is excellent quality.

This is still a bit of an token hungry solution, but it seems to be working reasonably well so far and I'm actively refining it as I build.

Not going to give you formal verification, but might be worth looking into strategies like this.

Author here, and I mostly agree with this sentiment. With that said, part of my Kiro spec here, had Kiro read my other blog posts and attempt to emulate my style.

I too found the write-up to be a little dry and long-winded, even though the same critique might be leveled at myself [hopefully to a lesser extent]. I did feel like it was a good step up from the usual AI slop out there, and served to illustrate Kiro's capabilities.

I suppose in this context, I wanted to see whether I could take my reader on a journey long enough for them to be surprised by the AI reveal at the end. I'm not sure whether it achieved that but that was the artistic intent of this specific piece.

I absolutely agree with the first part of this advice.

As to the assertion that complexity is not worth worrying about, I could not disagree more. I have watched projects fail time after time because of complexity, dependencies, and lack of budget.

Managers should encourage their engineers to spend time trying to simplify architecture and reduce code, infrastructure, and package dependencies. Smart engineers can learn to think simply over time, but this will not happen automatically. (I plead guilty to gravitating toward complexity in the early part of my career, but I have since learned better.)

Managers should place emphasis on using existing patterns wherever possible rather than re-inventing the wheel. Practicing laser focus on delivering value, evaluating solution dependencies with an eye to keeping things simple, and accurately modeling the problem domain in question.

Rather than trying to fight with engineers about implementation approaches, managers should try to guide engineers toward arriving at these conclusions themselves. I have also found that stressing simplicity as a key performance metric for engineers is a useful tool.

A couple of points: 1. Cloud Run is more analogous to AWS App Runner than Fargate. 2. Cloud Run isn't a great analog to lambda. Lambda is built to host functions. Cloud Run is built to host applications. Lambda is more analogous to GCP Functions. 3. Cloud Tasks should probably be built with EventBridge + Lambda or EventBridge + StepFunctions or EventBridge + ECS.

I don't profess to be a GCP expert so it's hard for me to make a judgement call on what's better. I can, however, say that most of this post ignores some of the real serverless power provided by AWS. AWS AppSync, AWS API Gateway, DynamoDB, CloudFront Functions, Lambda@Edge. It also makes comparisons that are not very fair.

Do you have a source of Magnus accusations? He seems to have withdrawn relatively quietly, perhaps consciously trying to refrain from cheating accusations.

Hikaru was less reserved on the other hand. He called Hans's post-game interview analysis sub-2700 level after Hans Neiman badly mis-evaluated several positions.

This isn't true. 10GB is the limit on docker backed lambda function sizes. Layers are capped to 256MB just like lambda functions.

A couple of weeks ago, I tried to deploy a lambda function that created Azure Subnets in python, and the Azure client was 265GB alone. My layer creation api call failed because of this.

I will say that for us this is a huge deal. We're a devops services company, and our customers expect their deployment pipelines to work. This is becoming a huge pain-point for a few of our customers and we recommended Github Actions to them. A couple of our customers want us to move away from GitHub actions because of how disruptive outages have been.

I've had relatively bad experiences with Cloudflare's DNS solution. Here are a couple of examples of pain-points: 1. You can't set NS records for an Apex domain registered through cloudflare (even at more expensive service tiers). You can delegate management of subdomains with NS records but only if you shell out for an expensive plan $$$. 2. Cloudflare performs cname flattening for cnames by default. This prevents you using cname based dns validation for third parties. One such example is certificates in Amazon Certificate Manager which performs cname lookups. You can disable cname flattening but you have to shell out for a more expensive plan $$$$.

Terraform 1.0 5 years ago

And yet if you try to pass values from one stack to another, it will fail spectacularly.

Terraform 1.0 5 years ago

@polynomial - You have to use the state API on the generated terraform. This means that you need to understand the structure of the generated terraform, and are dealing with generated .json files that require introspection to determine what terraform resource ids are prior to managing their state. It is possible to do, but if you're writing code, you don't want to have to worry about the generated json.

Terraform 1.0 5 years ago

@throwaway894345 You can, but that means you have to introspect the generated code to determine terraform resource ids etc. A really bad developer experience on large stacks.

Terraform 1.0 5 years ago

The token system is broken in TF CDK still and it's not ready for adoption. I've built two stacks with it but I'm back at terraform for now. I intend to explore pulumi though when the opportunity presents itself.

I think using a Turing-complete language like typescript with mature tooling to define cloud infrastructure feels very natural and makes things much more manageable than using HCL.

One thing I absolutely can't do without is the state management api terraform provides with its CLI. This is absent from terraform-cdk and aws's CDK, although many of the same APIs seem to exist for pulumi.

I follow these "archaic" rules myself, although I have a very different approach to these "hacks". Orthodox Judaism has an explicit prohibition of using loopholes to circumvent the spirit of the law called "Ha'aramah" mentioned in various plances throughout the Talmud including: Moed Katan 11b,12b, Nedarim 43a, 48a; Bava Metziah 62b and a bunch more I do not recall.

I have always understood there to be two classes of hacks in Judaism.

The impermissible class circumvents the spirit of the law.

The permissable class clarifies what the spirit of the law actually is.

The spirit of the Shabbat law is to rest and resting is defined as refraining from a set of 39 categories of labor. One of these categories is transferring an object from one domain to another. But is it really labor to carry a cake to a friends house as a gift when attending a meal? Is it labor to push a child around in a stroller?

The loophole of Eruv is intended to enable Jews to define communities by drawing a string around them and demarcate a logical line of what constitutes labor vs not on Shabbat as a something external to the community vs external to the home. This is a psychological exercise to force Jews to understand the boundaries of their communities so as to protect them from actually performing labor and preserving the sanctity of Shabbat.