LunicLynx

I think Ai is not the issue here. SEO on the other hand very much. It’s not like any one ever went to stackoverflow to find a solution, it was just that they were the google results for a lot of things

Need some money for a new Launchpad

Having the dashes to make something a headline on another row disconnects meaning. You now have to edit two lines to make one change.

Same for the code part.

This might be easier to read but it’s not simpler.

Not if the perception of Wikipedia is „truthful“ and „reliable“.

I’m saying neither, but in that case the article on Wikipedia puts weight behind the statements on the webpage.

I do see your argument: „But it would be adjusted to reflect the truth about it“. Honestly I don’t know enough about Wikipedia to agree or deny it. But given the amount of articles on it, i would lean in the direction that the motivation of a single few would win over the curators. Which means applying a vector that cannot be influenced by those few.

I could accept that there shouldn’t be content for children on the internet, at all, to make this an easy sell.

Parents will not solve this. They would need to first care and then to be as tech savvy as the people in this forum. And then all the content would need to be attributed correctly. If if if, and here we are

I don’t disagree with what you are saying but it isn’t a solution to the problem. And the problem is about the children.

Without trying to offend you, but you are arguing this as: we don’t need to regulate alcohol or drugs because experiences, for everyone, will be better in the end…

Maybe this is about time. It’s pretty clear that the internet as such is not and never has been for children.

But the way it is done is weird for sure.

But how do you do it in a way that it isn’t a burden on the parents or peer pressure the issue that breaks the intent?

Or is your point that the internet should be used by children?

If so how do you propose restricting the harmful content?

From my point of view we are in the digital Middle Ages. We do not yet understand if this global connection is actually being good or bad in the long run. The only thing that starts to crystallize is that it isn’t great for children. Specifically social media, especially especially people gaining access to children on troves to spread ideology.

So how to solve it. And „I don’t like the current approach“ without having a better idea is not a solution.

Just a comment: Rust does not have a garbage collector

Isn't this always the case? Most of the time you just don't know where AI stole it from?

Disclaimer; have not read the article.

My current feeling about blogging is, that it more then anything else is we’re certian knowledge of AI came from. The arguments for blogging being the thing again also started at the same time AI got traction.

Just identify the bloggers that know their craft, weight them height. And you got yourself a step change in LLM competency.

Paying no one.

The generic repository "pattern" is the prime example of this. There might be CRUD operations shared between repositories, but they should not be that base of every repository. I've seen this so many times, because in the beginning the CRUD stuff is what you code over and over again and then suddenly business logic emerges and everything breaks down, but the repository prevails because sunk cost fallacy ...

Is this a broken down budget you are talking about?

I don’t know the numbers but that spacex has more money moving around does not seem surprising. Launching 100s of rockets per year is not free?

Also did you do an accumulation over their existence? Blue had two orbital launches so far.

Fair. AI might also not be the problem, but how it is utilized.

Suddenly everyone and their grandma are specialist at everything and the actual value of understanding is not appreciated anymore.

This is not true. Because the copy is a devaluation of the original, so even though the web page is still there it’s value has decreased.

Wasn’t his point about plagiarism? That is also not ok on a small scale.

If they only would use lidar. Oh wait…

Any one surprised by this? This was very apparent around the iPhone 4 / 5 era. And the last ones hit were the 11 and 12 series.

If you are on windows it’s probably your virus scanner eating your IO and CPU

I’m sorry but I don’t understand why this is a story on hacker news. Nothing about this is interesting.

I’m open to understand why I might be wrong though.

I think marketwatch or financial times from the title…

Either this or we humans are out of the picture soon.

Markdown is not necessarily about presentation. It’s about structure that carries information.

Surely a html page could do the same but I would see that as the last step, to give to someone else.

I think it can be summarized: Don’t push a map on an explorer, they wanted to explorer, a map is not what they are looking for.

It’s a great article, thanks!

You are absolutely right, having copilot does not help at all here.

I guess that’s the point, FSD is not available. What you buy is lvl 4/5 available is lvl 2+.

I think, this is a calculation to understand if an upgrade of hw3 to hw4 actually solves the problem or if hw3 must be updated to hw5.

One upgrade is more economical than two, but I would be annoyed for sure as well.

Fair enough

But also tools that might not be nice and report security vulnerabilities, but exploit them.

There is no guarantee that open means that they will be discovered.

Came here to say the same. Same tools + private. In security two different defense-mechanisms are always better than one.

Simple S3 sooooooo S4 ? xD

And with robots, this also applies to the physical world.

UX want to put their own spin on things. I’ve noticed this repeatedly.

UX has gotten from something with a cause to being the cause for something