LtWorf

I marked all my project on github as closed and added a link to the codeberg one.

After years google will still link to github anyway.

I had thought of just keeping them open and sync them, but I thought in that case people would presume the project is actually active on github and try to interact creating issues and pull requests and getting frustrated.

I must say codeberg's reliability isn't the best, but with all the scrapers that hit them it's a miracle they do seem to manage. And at work things on our private network without scrapers aren't more reliable.

I seriously hope we codeberg users will be able to survive without your presence.

Create your own server and pay for it and they won't have anything to say about what you do with it.

I don't think surveillance prevents crime. Not having so many poor people prevents crime.

Some people will always be antisocial due to tendencies and possibly mental illness, but having a society that is so rich and yet has so many poor people as the USA will of course create criminals. No amount of cameras will solve that.

This is a cope.

One fascist guy who took part on the murder of a socialist MP when fascism had just gotten in power was jewish. Ended up being killed by nazis later on.

Yep people really delude themselves.

You are assuming the democrats run on the elections for the purpose of winning them.

But the latest election made me doubt that is actually their goal.

Being denied medical care is murder as well.

Perforce is free for 5 users too. ;)

Free as in freedom…

So you haven't understood the distinction or you're letting your feelings for software get the best of you.

The proof that there are no (for rust's definition of "no") memory bugs becomes worthless, not the entire software itself.

You don't seem to understand what I'm talking about.

bad axiom -> worthless theorem.

bad unsafe section -> verified safe section is actually not safe.

Rust doesn't check for logical errors, it checks for memory errors. So every single issue in an unsafe section is a potential CVE.

Oh we should certainly trust the opinion of the science denier. Surely his opinions will be based on hard data and not on feelings!

An "unsafe" in rust is like an axiom in mathematics. You can use to prove higher level theorems but it has to make sense.

The second that you start to introduce nonsensical axioms (or bugs in unsafe sections) all your proven correct theorems will be worthless.

Even when the laptop is asleep overnight it's practically melting.

Then something is waking it up and it's not asleep at all. Asleep the CPU shouldn't be running.

I don't think there being more rust developers should matter if we're talking about a company that solved coding.

For a company that solved coding and doesn't need any software engineers… why spend money to acquire a runtime rather than ask claude to rewrite it in assembly directly and be done with it?

Could it be that they aren't being entirely honest?

I don't think you can claim your code is secure, or can claim anything at all about your code, if you haven't written the code and have no idea what's in there.

Rust protects against a rather small group of memory error, if and only if the unsafe sections are actually correct. And nobody knows if they are correct or not, plus there can be millions of logical errors that can be exploited.

See how many CVEs uutils has… quite a lot for a supposedly secure rewrite of GNU coreutils.

Maybe you should consider the objections by their merit rather than just being angry someone dares to criticise anthropic?

new people will step up too

Or they will not… how could you possibly know.

Realistically the user has never used gnu/linux nor ever intends to do so.

Can you name one free alternative that already exists and is better?

Ok but how should the improved git replacement actually be?

Feels to me you're just saying things.

I don't think it's large files. It's basically made for .txt files and that is all. Even small binary files… you can have them but it's not great with those.

I think it's fine for scope to exist.

I was responding to someone who made a generic statement about git?

No no. I know SVN and mercurial as well. Git is better. And normally when someone pushes a huge file it means they compiled something on their machine and are placing it on git, which is something that raises all the alarm bells for me.

I don't understand why downvote something 100% factual and correct. Please explain!

apt-get is kinda old, "apt" is the new thing. It unifies some commands like apt-get, apt-cache, and probably something else but those are the only 2 I use :D

I'm pretty sure that also people who write novels aren't held back by how fast they can type.

I'm sure soon enough dating apps will get smart and instead of the "you have no matches" they will make some fake AI matches so you have a feeling that something is happening and you have a chance of actually meeting someone.