Koshkin

The Feynman Lectures and/or Berkeley Physics Course [1] would give one the basics one would ever need.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Physics_Course

If there was a Linux Apple App Store, I would buy stuff from it.

I believe you.

I already buy from Steam.

I believe this even more.

Healthy lifestyles: 21 or less units of alcohol per week

Looks Good

we have created operations

It seems that addition (for instance) was "created" long before us.

On the other hand, it seems highly unlikely that a civilization similar to ours could "invent" an essentially different kind of mathematics (or physics, etc.)

A fun name... (I wonder how many non-native English speakers realize that the two occurrences of 'oo' in 'googlebook' are not pronounced the same.)

For some reason it took a while for Copilot to write an executable machine code for Hello World.

once someone attains a postdoc-level...

... they will discover that level is already crowded by LLMs

Also: https://lew98.github.io/Mathematics/LADR_Solutions/LADR_Solu...

buying a single large capacity drive

Now that's a terrible idea. You shouldn't trust any single device with terabytes of your data, regardless of whether it is low-cost or Chinese.

in the way you are linking them

This is what the text says, not me.

In one system, a set can contain itself

But doesn't this lead to a contradiction (or to making the system of little use)?

category theory can use set theory, but does not depend on it

But aren't, say, the morphisms between two objects necessarily a set (termed "hom-set")?

Except such set is empty and thus does not contain itself.

a set can contain itself

Can it?

a term can have only one type... Due to this law, types cannot contain themselves

Doesn't look like one follows from the other...

... and, as such, it doesn't contain itself!

Parents do not have to be "experts in chilhood development" to know what is best for their children. Especially experts in their fields like the manufacturing of alcohol, guns or other products universallly considered dangerous.

Quite often clients were more powerful than servers. Hell, at one point a CPU embedded into a printer could be faster than, say, 8088. An X server (running on the client side) often required a more powerful machine than one running X clients (i.e. a server). A web browser is not an exception.

Well, graphics acceleration is still considered optional on servers :)

Not exactly. Pronunciation varies between dialects and accents; it is the subject of a linguistic discipline called "phonology"; writing systems or difficulties arising from their "irregularities" with respect to spoken word do not concern it. Put differently, speech and pronunciation, while related, are not the same.

Tried Amazon Luna once on a TV, it was indeed a good experience.

Yes. Linguists do that all the time. People do learn Latin, etc.

French person here :

I could guess that solely from the space before ':'

You do not guess, you learn.

a single way to pronounce it

Within a particular dialect, that is.

Sure; this has nothing to do with the way written words are spoken, though.

Finnish is not unique in that it has quite a few dialects like most other languages.

To be fair, the "ghoti" joke is not about pronunciation but rather about the perceived mismatch between the way a word is written and the way it is spoken.

60 is the smallest of the five numbers below 100 (the other being 72, 84, 90, 96) that have most divisors (12, to be exact).

What's currently missing from the automatic conflict resolution is intelligence. The AI doing merges is the future.

In American English, 'Adam' and 'atom' are pronounced the same.