HN user

KittenInABox

1,317 karma
Posts47
Comments735
View on HN
www.youtube.com 19d ago

How Fascists Construct Scientific Ignorance [video]

KittenInABox
9pts3
www.typebarmagazine.com 4mo ago

Science Fiction Is Dying. Long Live Post Sci-Fi?

KittenInABox
69pts112
policyoptions.irpp.org 4mo ago

Gender markers are useless, so why not abolish them?

KittenInABox
4pts1
www.cnbc.com 5mo ago

The 'boomcession': Why Americans feel left behind by a growing economy

KittenInABox
5pts0
thisweekinvideogames.com 5mo ago

Concept Artists Say Generative AI References Only Make Their Jobs Harder

KittenInABox
1pts0
techcrunch.com 6mo ago

Wikimedia Foundation Announces AI Partnerships with Amazon, Meta, Microsoft

KittenInABox
3pts1
www.upress.umn.edu 7mo ago

Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right

KittenInABox
2pts0
www.lightspeedmagazine.com 8mo ago

To Access Seven Obelisks, Press Enter

KittenInABox
3pts0
www.scientificamerican.com 8mo ago

Jeffrey Epstein Emails Reveal Depth of Ties to High-Profile Scientists

KittenInABox
10pts4
www.404media.co 8mo ago

Google Has Chosen a Side in Trump's Mass Deportation Effort

KittenInABox
24pts2
tribune.com.pk 8mo ago

Sam Altman served with subpoena during live talk with Steve Kerr

KittenInABox
6pts1
nymag.com 9mo ago

The Trap at 26 Federal Plaza

KittenInABox
2pts0
www.nytimes.com 9mo ago

Mourn, or Else

KittenInABox
4pts9
thewalrus.ca 9mo ago

The Publishing Industry Has a Gambling Problem

KittenInABox
5pts0
www.youtube.com 10mo ago

Who Counts as Irish? [video]

KittenInABox
1pts0
boingboing.net 10mo ago

Oracle's Ellison joins Musk and Zuckerberg in controlling platforms billions see

KittenInABox
8pts0
erictopol.substack.com 10mo ago

Our Preoccupation with Protein Intake

KittenInABox
5pts0
www.decodingeverything.com 10mo ago

I'm Sad That the World That Inspired Me to Get into This Game Is Now Gone

KittenInABox
4pts1
www.nytimes.com 10mo ago

In Trump's Federal Work Force Cuts, Black Women Are Among the Hardest Hit

KittenInABox
2pts0
www.wired.com 10mo ago

The Baby Died. Whose Fault Is It?

KittenInABox
4pts1
www.inquirer.com 10mo ago

Philly's experiment giving cash to struggling renters is working

KittenInABox
2pts0
arxiv.org 11mo ago

Testing Prosocial Interventions Using Generative Social Simulation

KittenInABox
2pts0
jamanetwork.com 1y ago

Law Enforcement Drug Seizures and Opioid-Involved Overdose Mortality

KittenInABox
3pts0
www.nbcnews.com 1y ago

One of the country's leading Alzheimer's projects is in jeopardy

KittenInABox
27pts0
news.ycombinator.com 1y ago

Ask HN: Have the US revoking of visas affected you?

KittenInABox
11pts1
www.theverge.com 1y ago

Microsoft's new Dragon Copilot is an AI assistant for healthcare

KittenInABox
1pts1
cindybaldwinbooks.substack.com 1y ago

The Nightlock-Berry Theory of Collective Liberation

KittenInABox
1pts0
archive.ph 1y ago

CDC Posts, Then Deletes, Data on Bird Flu Spread Between Cats and People

KittenInABox
57pts7
insidemedicine.substack.com 1y ago

CDC: Unpublished manuscripts mentioning certain topics must be pulled or revised

KittenInABox
844pts721
www.forbes.com 1y ago

Why Kids' Shows Like 'Cocomelon' Hamper Critical Brain Development

KittenInABox
10pts0

I think it depends. The people that I know that have made significant sacrifices to live along their morals are usually people who 1) are intensely bitter when others will not sacrifice as much as them; 2) are completely understanding of people who will not sacrifice as much as them or acknowledge that they simply have less to sacrifice than others. For example someone who is willing to live the "dirtbag" lifestyle out of their car to dedicate to their outdoorsman activity who is either bitter others have the relative financial security or feel immensely grateful they have consistently good enough health that allows them to be outdoors with so little resources.

For example I think the decision to stick to certain morals is very hard if someone has a disabled dependent, are disabled themselves, or require consistent access to healthcare. There are different lines for different people of course. Our ire shouldn't go towards individuals who make these decisions but the people in power who force others to be in a position where these decisions need to be made.

I am perfectly for less job stability in the US but only if it comes with a strong safety net. Losing your job after a year or six months is whatever broski if you have robust healthcare and are unlikely to go homeless. I see SpaceX and Anthropic aiming for IPOs in the trillion range of valuation and all I can see is, how come these companies are benefitting from the "increased efficiency" but the regular guys are not feeling the same kind of optimism? I wanna cheer for them because a rising tide lifts all boats. Instead I feel less and less secure while I have anonymous online people "well actually"ing me about how broadly my life is supposedly better in aggregate average. The cognitive dissonance makes no sense to me.

This may sound condescending but: you sound young, not disabled, and extremely sheltered from being exposed to disabled people.

I am in a position to be intimately familiar with illness. I will say that health is a spectrum and the mind is incredibly resilient. You will surprise yourself as you inevitably age how much your mind will adapt to always hurting. There is more to life than body discomfort. This patient sounds like he has his faculties and is making an informed decision to continue living, because his life is worth the discomfort he is going through. I am reminded of a line along the lines of every day you experience, no matter how terrible, is very likely a day that someone else yesterday would have desperately wanted.

The fundamental problem with this of course is that every human being is likely more niche and more advanced at the LLM in the things that they find most important, and this realization sours the average user's impression of LLM usefulness. For example, an LLM cannot reasonably find me alternatives to specific tea regional vendors because the LLM does not know enough about tea to be able to say "this tea is half the price for 80% of the qualities of tea you're looking for". Instead I have to build my own mental knowledge base of careful trying and tasting and recalling which an LLM would maybe only have if I personally wrote every single tea session I have ever had in my life for it as context.

But hunting for a new tea to try is something I do regularly and something I would likely try with an LLM only to come away deeply disappointed with the results. And then I just wouldn't have much faith in it after that for things I don't have much knowledge about, like looking for a gift idea for one of the hobbies of a friend.

Rising productivity would have reduced the average work week regardless.

Do you have evidence of this?

consider that the benefits package routinely offered to employees is worth around 40% of their pay

Please define "routinely" and "employees". Part-time employees do not get benefits packages, much less benefits packages worth 40% of their pay. PTO, Sick time, family leave, and other "benefits" are actually legally mandated and I do not see any evidence that companies would offer this if they were not mandated to do so.

Disabled people exist, even temporarily so (e.g. pregnant with a craving, broken ankle and can't drive, etc)!

Also, sometimes some meals are arguably not worth the labor of cooking. Making proper pho takes at least a whole day. Pad Thai really doesn't function without the kind of intense heat of specific equipment. Etc etc.

Extremely weird cover selection. Books like Stag Dance, Project: Hail Mary, The Emperor of Gladness, etc. None of them have that. Some of the books listed there are several years old (The Death of Vivek Oji was published in 2020). A Map Is Only One Story isn't even fiction?? I think its very cherrypicked of a complaint. Not to mention the author doesn't talk at all about the rise of romantasy and finding bets like Alchemised and Fourth Wing (neither of which have these covers complained about).

This is the first time I heard that this is an issue where the brain isn't filtering out noise properly. This explains why I have had tinnitus, the sound of breathing, whooshing in the ears from my heartbeat, etc. audible to me for as long as I've been conscious and have never understood why everyone else seemed to be really disturbed by what I consider to be supremely normal. Except I also have a sensory processing disorder that makes my brain unable to filter input well so I also come off as sensitive to touch and able to pick up smells well. Because I grew up with all this though I have normalized it enough to function.

IIRC the relationship between cholesterol and diet is more complicated than eating cholesterol == more cholesterol. Especially in this case you're eating cholesterol with a high-fiber meal which prevents a significant amount of the absorption of it.

Layoffs at Block 5 months ago

I see fundamentally human wellbeing as more important. Jobs are just the structure society has built as a gateway for this.

Layoffs at Block 5 months ago

I do mean homo sapiens. Humans are a cooperative species. They will hunt and gather together in loose communities naturally, sharing excess resources even if individuals are not directly contributing to the resource creation due to being too young, too old, sick or injured. Having inter-societal competition doesn't mean we don't still have cooperative society. Just because ants will fight other ants in different colonies doesn't mean ants are not a social species.

Layoffs at Block 5 months ago

I feel like the idea that X doesn't owe you Y is fundamentally at odds with the fact that humans are a cooperative species and survive the best when they are cooperating. A choir can hold a note together because individuals can stop singing to breathe, safely covered by peers who will take their turn to breathe later. What is the point of organizing socially if not for the benefit of all society members?

I know we have to balance inefficiency and optimal allocation of resources... but I agree it doesn't seem optimal for social wellbeing to remove people from their access to health and risking their ability to house and feed themselves without a financial need to do so (like Block going bankrupt).

On the contrary I think Americans are reacting about the same as any other set of people would react. There are always going to be people who, as long as their personal lives are stable, they are not going to do anything to put that stability at risk. America is also huge enough that even if one part of the country is having a crisis, millions of fellow citizens will not hear of it or have any 2nd, 3rd or 4th hand connection to the matter.

But also if a small portion of Americans disparately plan to do stuff like sabotage surveillance camera, it's still newsworthy.

Sizing chaos 5 months ago

GLP-1 functioning as methodone is fine for me tbh. Medically assisted addiction management is pretty gold-standard for a lot of addictions!

I agree with this in general but with caveats. For example I think reading national-sized news every day sucks. But if you're of a specific demographic it might be useful to keep pretty up to date on nuanced issues, like if you're a gun owner you will probably want to keep up to date on gun licensing in your area. Or if you're a trans person it's pretty important nowadays to be very aware of laws being passed to dictate your legally going to whatever bathroom or something.

I think this is an interesting conundrum, because I feel it is also important to critically consider the people who are making points because it can also inform you about why these points are being made. I don't consider this a tacit ad hominem per se, because we must acknowledge the open internet is full to the brim of bad actors and bots and we cannot equally engage with all comments. It is fine and appropriate to identify comments one doesn't want to engage with, not even with the brainpower of reading. This has increasingly forced people to make concessions to avoid misunderstandings due to other people's need to filter comments.

I believe the argument will be that the rent seeking will be used to position themselves such that it doesn't matter who is in power, the government will listen to them not the other way around. Admittedly, the fact is, the Epstein Files existed across multiple political parties' justice departments and none of those folks have been investigated or prosecuted...

Actually, ideally I'd love to dig deep into and specialize in database management systems internals. I think data engineering in general is the underspoken but fundamental necessity to any sort of application, AI or otherwise, but especially any concept of a data warehouse.

In my mind we will have a bimodal set of skills in software development, likely something like a product engineer (an engineer who is also a product manager-- this person conceptualizes features and systemically considers the software as a whole in terms of ergonomics, business sense, and the delight in building something used by others) and something like a deep-in-the-weeds engineer (an engineer who innovates on the margins of high performance, tuning, deep improvements to libraries and other things of that nature). The former is needing to skill in rapid context switching, keeping the full model of customer journey in their minds, while also executing on technical rigor enough to prevent inefficiencies. The latter will need to skill in being able to dive extremely deeply into nuanced subjects like fine-tuning the garbage collector, compiler, network performance, or internal parts of the DOM or OS or similar.

I would expect a lot of product engineering to specialize further into domains like healthtech, fintech, adtech, etc. While the in-the-weeds engineering will be platform, infra, and embedded systems type folks.