Khaine

Ah, makes sense. Its well written and an interesting piece of work, I just noticed hints of 'claudisms' in places.

It reads like it was written, or heavily edited by AI

Yeah, that is a garbage claim - https://hereticalinsights.substack.com/p/did-elon-musk-kill-...

The drug dealers are giving out a bit more of a free hit to get people hooked on the more expensive models.

Can anyone recommend a good server for a homelab to use for a storage purpose like this?

Teams, the new outlook are both piles of garbage. They've been garbage for years, and will probably still be garbage in a decade from now.

Teams takes 2gig of memory on launch, and still misses keystrokes because it is so unresponsive. Click on someone and start typing and half your chat isn't recorded. Absolute hot garbage.

Outlook isn't much better.

People who worked on them should be ashamed to consider these products shippable.

I just upgraded my plan to try out Fable and now this

I would find a blog post on this really interesting.

And Web Developers want more and more OS features built into the browser. This is why I'm against it. Features are only ever abused.

I currently use Gitea. I am interested in your opinion on why you prefer Forgejo to Gitea

I believe it. I've seen the cyber team in my org bend every rule just to get access to frontier security models.

Everyone has become like petulant children. Senior leaders want access to every shiny tool (CoWork/Codex/etc) that has some buzz around it. No one seems to care about the cost or whether we are actually realising benefits.

It's sheer madness, and you can't push back. I think AI can significantly help people be more productive, and I can see a future where they safely take on more autonomy. But we are far from that world.

Good to see we’re ensuring cyclists remain as endearing as ever.

Since they haven’t pushed anything into the repo. They said it would be open source. There is also this article with details:

https://www.findarticles.com/cisco-launches-defenseclaw-for-...

The RedLetterMedia guys watched thunderpants and enjoyed it. If you can't be bothered watching it, you can watch their summary discussion of it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGI-BKctOK8

Its like since COVID everyone forgot their manners in public.

I meant it as a joke, given that oracle is famously litigious. It would solve the legal questions

Someone be brave, and do this to ZFS. Poke the Oracle bear!

Georgia makes wine in its traditional style or 'european' style. Traditional style is where the crushed grapes including branches is stored in clay pots (called Qvevri) for fermentation and aging. This means Georgian wines often have a different colour and can be cloudy.

European is the style of how most wine is made in Europe

The most famous style is Saperavi which is a Red wine.

This is a decade old, and its still on point https://www.r-bloggers.com/2016/09/the-simpsons-by-the-data/

Its sad that one of the funniest and subversive shows on television has become a rotten husk of itself.

Zombie Simpsons has been on longer than the golden and silver age of the Simpsons. They really need to let it go.

People have been saying this since day dot. It was very controversial for Debian to change to use systemd. The vote was close due to many arguments which are still being played out

This sounds horrible for user experience. That used to be Apple's claimed Raison d'être. It's sad how far they are willing to debase themselves to chase a few extra nickels. They are already one of the richest companies in the world.

Surely they should focus on improving the actual quality of their products (particularly software), and developer experience and documentation, rather than further watering down their quality.

This is going to leave a black stain on Tim Cook's legacy. Sure apple may be more profitable and bigger than ever, but its betrayed its legacy, and its users.

I think this misses something fundamental. Most of the colonies Britain created until the race for Africa were to support the Navy. During the 16th century they were efforts to create colonies to support trade (i.e. North America, India). Britain then needed a strong navy to support its merchant vessels who sold English goods all over the world, and bought goods from all over the world to Britain. Which is why colonies like the cape were created. It is this growth in merchants that brought riches. Those riches would not have lasted without a Navy to protect the merchants from piracy or privateers.

Colonies were not originally intended to be profitable, they were way points for ships to stock up on goods, water, men, etc. Leaders in those colonies on their own initiatives then looked to expand the colonies to make themselves a big name.

the definition of open: “mkdir android ; cd android ; repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git ; repo sync ; make” - Andy Rubin

This has really stood the test of time...

Thats just what the internet of the mid to late 90s was like. People rarely used their real name, there were hundreds of forums, some private. You could have different nicks on them.

Nobody knew you were a dog on the internet[1] until the rise of Facebook and linking your real identity with an online identity.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_...

Thats an important point. You can't tell if the software you use is vulnerable to something like log4j without the vendor telling you, or doing lots of manual investigation.

SBOMs are supposed to help with software composition analysis. Basically, you as an enterprise have an inventory of what software you use, and their SBOMs (i.e. dependencies). I can then use this to automatically check which software is impacted by severe vulnerabilities when they are announced.

SBOMs are a solution intended to help solve a couple of problems:

1) help identify and remediate software that has been built with vulnerable packages (think log4j).

2) help protect against supply chain compromise as the SBOM contains hashes that allow packages to be verified

I took knowability to be, how well you know the properties of a particle? For example, if you could perfectly knew the position of a particle, then you would have no knowledge of its momentum.

I thought Hisenberg meant the more you knew about one property (i.e. the smaller the bound on the position of a particle) the less you knew about the other property.

I'm not an expert on this, so more than happy to be corrected.

Airplay from youtube is broken for me. I airplay and instead of english, I get german and no way to change the language. This is not an isolated incident.

See https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/1id4amh/youtube_ch... and https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255931836

Doesn't measurement == knowability ?

like you don't truly know something until you measure it?