HN user
No one knows if the pigeon-hole principle applies absolutely exclusive to the ability to generalize outside of a training set.
That is the existential, $1T question.
"Essentially"
This is the #1 pedantic thing HN frequenters flail over.
Turing built a limited machine, bound to a finite tape.
Bravo.
The hospital, sure.
Why would Wuhan center being empty represent anything?
People don't rush to a random (unrelated) building when they get sick at the "market".
Coincidence, surely?
What are the chances of having a specialized infectious disease center next to where that type of disease spontaneously emerged?
More or less likely than a bat having sex with a panda possum?
No one, not even the cowardly academics, believed it.
This is day 1 jailbreaking common sense
False, facts only need to be seen once, and one mis-step in reasoning and your CoT is derailed.
> the open-domain Frame Problem is equivalent to the Halting Problem and is therefore undecidable.
You _can_ combinate through them, just not in our universe.
Maybe those software engineers should "lrn2code", just as the journalists, artists, and trucker drivers had to.
The hospital was full.
The institute would never be full.
There is no "bring your child to work day" in China.
Weird conflation, unlikely... uunless you mean to muddy the waters and sow dis-information.
Lol people were getting called racist for suggesting it was anything less than the spawn of a bat and an asian water racoon.
It still isn't even acceptable to acknowledge the (blatant) possibility that Omnicron was intentionally leaked because of low vaccine effectiveness.
I'm guessing by not jumping into a terminating/ halting NOOP.
The logic is within the branching.
Sieve the temporary backprop interim weights as a function of its loss of varentrophy relative to its place in the revalued weights.
Remove the bottom weights dynamically based on the local gradient in varentrophy so that internal dissonance ("doubt") can be selected against.
"Preference Optimization" but with more opportunities for meta-optimization.
"Workflow automation" is gonna be the goalpost to beat
Fruits want to be eaten, Veggies don't.
>solve for prompt injection attacks
Thank you, he has articulated some outcomes and signs I hadn't yet.
His thesis that AI is just distilled omega-capitalism is true, very plainly.
What an exisistentally terse moment for late stage capitalism; betting State-sponsored shitcoins on our future quasi-cybernetic giga-corp overlords to offset increasingly miniscule differences in individual economic starvation.
I would suggest being careful treading that thought experiment.
Productivity went up for those still employed.
This mindset allows one to donate their intellect to society and feel immortalized.
If privacy wasn't of particular concern, this is as near an "absolute good" idea as one can forge.
Collective (un)concious, yes.
There is no parallel chains of unconnected thought.
We are barely, rarely more than the sum of our parts on average.
We have very convincing illusions of free will though - like the apparent exhibition of agency.
'Mess'-iah Complex(ity)
Fake job theory.
Essentially broken window theory with humans.
URL encoding solves part of this.
>Example.com/Verify/5W9GF
Local convenience cookie for authenticating device and permi-cookie for requesting device.
Permanent cookies should be accompanied with a 4 digit numeric PIN between any critical functions unless the session is new.
The thought of using unpronounceable text to deter phishing attempts reminds me of putting illegible Unicode as challenge question answers to prevent the CSR from giving an account away to convincing social engineers.
Originality does not exist, humans are not capable of purely original thought.
Closest you can get are unique sentences.
Information is now relegated by the anointed as a weapon us peons are too stupid or naive to weild.
You are correct, but that just means your opinion offends the anointed, and thus is similarly buried.
>onanistic preening
Lol 1 outta 28 isn't a black queer mom of two.
The clash of these characteristics is what defy and define these unlikely odds.
This is trolling rage bait. Like most big corp content.
Its mirroring the capability (if not currently the executive agency) of being able to convince people to do things. That alone gaps the barrier as social engineering is impossible to patch - harder than full proofing models against being jailbroken/used in an adversarial context.
Asking characteristics about the result cause performance to drop because it's essentially asking the model to model itself implicitly/explicitly.
Also the more "factoids" / clauses needed to answer accurately are inversely proportional to the "correctness" of the final answer (on average, when prompt-fuzzed).
This is all because the more complicated/entropic the prompt/expected answer, the less total/accumulative attention has been spent on it.
>What is the second character of the result of the prompt "What is the name of the president of the U.S. during the most fatal terror attack on U.S. soil?"