HN user

JeremyStein

93 karma
Posts1
Comments38
View on HN

If their only other option is to pull themselves together and get a job, then I suppose that's true. It seems unlikely.

Don't use this as an excuse to do nothing. Be smart, but be compassionate.

Thank you OP (kennethologist) for fixing the title of this article. The nymag title is "JCPenney Permanently Cuts All Prices by 40 Percent" which is certainly not true. Copy editor Bill Walsh writes:

The company meant "permanent" in the sense of regular prices as opposed to sale prices. It’s lowering regular prices and cutting back on sales in a strategy that may or may not work. If the strategy doesn’t work, the company has every right to change course -- and if it does, a bunch of news outlets will be revealed as big, fat liars.

Bill goes on to criticize lazy journalists who just write what they're told: http://theslot.blogspot.com/2012/01/penney-want-cracker.html

Whenever I read about bypassing real estate agents, I wish there were some good statistics instead of just anecdotes. You might think you saved money by doing it yourself, but could an agent have gotten you a better deal?

For an anecdote opposing the article, our neighbor sold her house during the boom and reluctantly used an agent. There was a bidding war on the house and it sold for 15% more than her asking price. I doubt that would have happened without the agent.

"It's a TAX on the YOUNG to care for the OLD."

<sarcasm> Yeah! Who do those old people think they are, getting all weak and sickly!? </sarcasm>

Most of the western world believes that society should be taxed to provide health care for everyone. Like education, welfare, and social security, it's something we all pay for to live in a moral, civilized society. Thank God Ayn Rand doesn't run the universe and the government forces you and me to pay for Grandpa's medication.

I don't buy it. It's all anecdotal. Is there a statistical correlation between the cat remaining with a person for more than X minutes and the person dying within Y days? My bet is that staff predictions have a better track record.

It's not a matter of skipping Starbucks, buying clothes from a department store, and having a "staycation". When you're paying $3000/mo for your mortgage, $1000/mo on school tuition, $800/mo on your car lease, etc. you can't cut your expenses without making major changes. And, if you expect to get a job in the next few months, it doesn't make sense to move to a bad neighborhood, transfer to public school, and buy a used car.

!ptr is bad.

I worked with a C programmer who changed all occurrences of "ptr != 0" to "!ptr". The program stopped working. In Windows, a null pointer is not 0. The C idiom "ptr != 0" compiles correctly, but when you try to get clever with "!ptr", you were in trouble. The expression would evaluate to false on a null pointer. (At least with the version of Visual C++ we were using back then.)