HN user

H0n3sty

71 karma
Posts3
Comments61
View on HN
New Cities 10 years ago

What should a city optimize for?

The health and longevity of its citizens.

How should we measure the effectiveness of a city (what are its KPIs)?

Minimizing disease, mortality, poverty, and crime.

What values should (or should not) be embedded in a city's culture?

Active lifestyle, minimalism… courtesy, respect, appreciation of fellow citizens. Volunteerism.

How can cities help more of their residents be happy and reach their potential?

People get jealous of each other very easily. Cultures that don’t promote the flaunting of wealth tend to be happier. The two most conspicuous examples of excessive consumption are large homes and expensive cars. As advanced primates we’re most comfortable in moderately forested land with ample water. Above all this, people require a safe place to live so effective means of crime deterrent are critical. Once the base of Maslow’s hierarchy is met, people will actualize on their own.

How can we encourage a diverse range of people to live and work in the city?

If you build it they will come. It’s really that simple. There’s no magic formula, a diverse range of people is required to run a city.

How should citizens guide and participate in government?

Citizens should enumerate the authorities of their leadership rather than allowing leadership all authorities not specifically excluded.

How can we make sure a city is constantly evolving and always open to change?

It’s psychologically easier to move away from a rental than an owned unit. I know there is dogma about the financial security around home ownership, but leasing a residential unit is really not all that different from renting the money to buy a unit. So I think severely restricting or eliminating traditional home “ownership” might keep the population ready for quick changes.

How can we make and keep housing affordable? This is critical to us; the cost of housing affects everything else in a city.

By restricting/eliminating outright ownership and zoning out excessively large units or charging progressively more per square foot for larger constructions (on a per occupant basis).

How can we lay out the public and private spaces (and roads) to make a great place to live? Can we figure out better zoning laws?

Priority should be given first to the natural spaces, followed by living spaces, then the sidewalks, and bikeways/waterways. The automobile roads should be relegated to the outskirts of the city in an exterior loop with limited access to the interior for critical functions. Zoning out excessively large homes is critical.

What is the right role for vehicles in a city? Should we have human-driven cars at all?

Probably shouldn’t have many human-driven cars in the city aside from possibly emergency responders. The vehicles should be utilized to serve human needs rather than display status of the owners.

How can we have affordable high-speed transit to and from other cities?

The hyperloop sounds most promising right now. Musk is a modern day Midas.

How can we make rules and regulations that are comprehensive while also being easily understandable? Can we fit all rules for the city in 100 pages of text?

Arbitration agreements and waivers for all residents. Not sure about the rules. I suspect that most cities are already subject to enough state/federal rules to require little in the way of local ordinances. We might look for the shortest examples on municode.com for inspiration.

What effects will the new city have on the surrounding community?

People who are able to relocate are more likely to be young and depending on the success of the city it may attract the most talented. Prosperous cities have a way of draining the brains of surrounding communities. On positive note, former residents tend to benefit the previous communities when they return/visit.

Trump 10 years ago

Among some. Doing a startup isn't really a partisan issue.

Trump 10 years ago

No, he proposed deporting illegal immigrants, which happen to be predominantly from Mexico. Many people of other backgrounds who are in the US illegally will be deported as well.

It's interesting that a presidential candidate can differentiate themselves from other candidates (and receive so much hatred) by stating that they will enforce the law when elected.

Making everyone obey the law is not tilting policy against one group just because that group has abused it disproportionately.

Trump 10 years ago

we are a nation of immigrants, and we know that immigrants built this country

More precisely, our nation was built by pioneers. When they arrived in the US they had nearly no welfare programs to draw from. You can have a country with open immigration, and you can have a country with generous welfare, but you can't have both.

http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-Native-Households

Trump 10 years ago

To hold the belief that all people of a particular race are incapable of doing something that another race does is the definition of racism.

'We're in a Bubble' 10 years ago

Most real estate agents, mortgage brokers, and building contractors couldn't see the real estate bubble either. It's hard to see a bubble when you're inside of it.

The tech bubble may very well outlast the US dollar bubble.

Re Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick's post:

"Regarding this morning's scripture posting on social media, be assured that the post was not done in response to last night's tragedy," the statement said. "The post was designed and scheduled last Thursday...We regret the unfortunate timing of these posts and ask everyone to join us in praying for the people of Orlando in this awful time."

http://www.people.com/article/texas-dan-patrick-tweets-bible...

You might see a cost reduction if you learn to grow some of the more expensive varieties. The yield is tricky because there are other variables that factor in like ambient temperature/moisture and the prescribed ranges are rather large. I'm working on my first grow kit, and so far the yield is zero :(

Yes, because speech is not violent but actions can be.

Blaming speech reminds me of a small child pleading that someone made them do it when they learn there are consequences for their actions.

Free speech is hateful and intolerant to a peace loving people.

And we all know Islam is a race, not a religion, so it deserves the same protections from discrimination.

When will these lovely jokes get old?

Yes, it's as if our society wants to believe they really are the larger than life characters they play on screen. To his credit, he opened with...

It’s an honor to be part of this day.... But let’s be honest — It’s an honor I didn’t earn.

The mother being present is not required for a child to be exclusively breastfed anymore. Pumping is quite effective. The only argument for only the woman to be taking the time off and making these career compromises is one that views women as the only capable caregivers.

True that it's not required, but I suspect that when a child is in physical contact with its mother during nursing their are other benefits. For instance, the release of beneficial hormones during this type of bonding is well documented. Do you know of any studies on the impacts of bottle feeding breast milk vs nursing? (hoping I don't sound oppressive)

Wow, that's a really good question. I'm fairly certain you've done a great deal more research on this than me. I had to start by finding the definition of two of the words you used. For the benefit of others who might not be as well versed...

evopsych - psychological traits are evolved adaptations

phrenology - the detailed study of the shape and size of the cranium as a supposed indication of character and mental abilities

My previous post was based on information from a recent study on Y-DNA which indicates a high differential in reproductive rate between men and women, with men reproducing at a much lower rate. This of course means that reproductive competition is much higher amongst men (at least in terms of successful reproduction) and might have lead to the aggressive pruning that we see in the y-chromosome. I'm also aware that competition has a heavy influence on evolution and that the sex chromosomes are not really isolated to gender specific anatomy.

Here's that study: http://genome.cshlp.org/content/25/4/459.full

I found another study (link below) on differences in personality traits across genders and culture. The authors found gender differences to be most pronounced in cultures that minimize traditional sex roles. Does this study fit your criteria?

http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~ssj/Genderdifferences%20in%20persona...

With respect to phrenology, I'm aware of studies linking brain size to intelligence. The meta-analysis (linked below) confirms this and actually notes a higher correlation among women.

http://www.govrel.vcu.edu//news/Releases/2005/june/McDaniel-...

From your previous post, I'm guessing you might have reason to discard this type of study. Could you please elaborate and share your thoughts?

Affirmative action sets a lower barrier to entry for people of certain races, or it establishes quotas around certain races. This is to say that they cannot be held to the same standard of merit and expect a proportional outcome to something like admission to a particular college.

without regard to their race, creed, color...

Affirmative action does the very thing it purports to ensure against, by discriminating on the bases of race.

If you believe that one race is inferior in some way and cannot compete on a level playing field then you may feel that affirmative action is necessary to give them a greater advantage. You mentioned circumstances which basically form an inferiority from past accrued disadvantage (I know you called it disadvantage of circumstance, but try to follow me for a moment). This doesn't seem to be the case with affirmative action admissions programs because they lower the bar for Blacks and raise the bar for Asians. Sure Blacks, were treated worst than Asians throughout most of American history, but Whites were not treated better than Asians.

Often the greatest beneficiaries of these programs are not native born African Americans, but recent African immigrants whose ancestors were not enslaved in the US, and not subject to past discrimination and segregation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/nyregion/long-island-high-...

http://nypost.com/2015/04/05/meet-the-student-accepted-into-...

Incidentally, the two cases above would make good counterpoints to the idea of racial intellectual inferiority regardless of affirmative action and would likely have been able to gain admissions to a top university without it. But the unfortunate consequence of affirmative action is that many people will assume it is all because of their special treatment. Clarence Thomas had much more difficult obstacles to overcome, and he was subjected to this unfortunate assumption after graduating from law school.

I think the real intention of affirmative action is to achieve more equal outcomes across racial divides. I think that's a good objective. But I also think this is a policy that sounds much better than it actually works. If we're to have more equal outcomes, then we need more equal opportunities and we need an end to all forms of discrimination.

I'm still trying to decide if you're holding the racism of lower expectation beliefs. Privileged and oppressed are just code words with no clear meaning. I don't know you, so I don't know why you would use profanity to describe Justice Thomas. He has solid principles based on his life's experiences and has had to endure a lot to serve so it makes no sense to me that anyone would describe him that way.

You're probably right about the labels but certainly wrong about the accuracy (thanks for the tip).

I'm not sure why some races perform better at some tasks, on average. I think that Blacks are faster sprinters than Asians, on average. I think that Asians have a higher preference for education than Blacks, on average. I think that the physical characteristics that we describe as races are shaped by evolutionary pressures. Darker skin is likely an adaptation for living closer to the equator. Blacks can probably withstand more direct sun exposure than Whites before developing skin cancer. None of this makes one race superior to another outside the narrow scope of the adaptive characteristic, and even then you only see the differences on average.

I suspect that the lower turnout of women in tech has more to do with preferences around work/life balance and family. But I wouldn't rule out other possible explanations. I've witnessed a few emotional breakdowns at work, but never from men. Which is fortunate because it seems that when men snap they go postal, on average.

I disagree with a SCOTUS Justice who happens to be black

I like how you phrased that. Much more civil. Do you like George Carlin :D? -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRoOOm0-3_8

In case anyone is wondering what the "textbook" definition of racism is:

the belief that "ALL" members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

The belief that races may be different in average ability with respect to certain characteristics or that members of certain races have their own preferences is not racist. Some people like to use the term racist as some sort of a perverted trump card to silence an opposing view rather than engaging in an actual debate. Good luck trying to have a civil conversation with someone like that.

But isolating/segregating with women-only groups like this is good?

I hope your dislike of Justice Thomas is just because you don't agree with his politics. I think your use of profanity is inappropriate regardless of your reasoning.

Perhaps you would like economist Thomas Sowell better. Or perhaps you're unwilling to give honest consideration to other views.

I spent a few years teaching math and I think that made public speaking rather easy for me. If you're looking for a supportive group to help improve your public speaking skills then I recommend you checkout your local toastmasters group. I've not attended myself, but I've heard from several members that it was life changing for them. Just like most every other group, they don't discriminate based on race or gender - so you should be very welcome.

If there's a technology you really like working with, then you might want to look on meetup.com to see if you can find some like minded people and look for an opportunity to present something. Some of the meetup.com groups discriminate based on gender or race, but the vast majority do not and are very welcoming :)