Plain JS ? Not even that is true, it uses JSX ...
HN user
GroSacASacs
almost every view framework is based on plain JS
We are using https://github.com/Canop/miaou to stay productive, loads fast, markdown support, replies, channels
Have a look at BlasJs also https://github.com/R-js/blasjs
I see this too much nowadays, people who want to use cool technologies to make new software, without knowledge if it is better for the user. It is not progress, it is change.
What are the benefits compared to Mastodon social network ?
how do you explore pulbic bitbuckets repos ? I can't find search tool.
Delegate and grow
phony add on
very good, and also may provide smarter autofill
is it regex-DOS proof ?
How did the situation evolve since 2014
It's not just about offline or push. In my experience enterprises pay big to have their app (their website with less things in a webview) in the AppStore. Because they think it is cool. And the network effect is potentially infinite right ?
You as a developer, are paid to do the thing. Where money lies, only solutions exist no problems.
normal, modern dev with automated builds and git creates a build every time you commit (or every push), and you can commit for a missing comma so ... with 10 or more people working on it on a daily basis it can go up very fast
Sometimes less is more. JS and JSON. JS and HTML. Cars and Motorbikes. TV and Radio.
Both can exist at the same time and be usefull.
you can escape backticks with \
As a game developper I would use this information to set the inital graphics settings on low instead of medium.
Email is one backdoor less to care about, step by step you can regain total privacy with project like these
incorrect
try {
throw new Error("catch me !"); // force try to fail
} catch (catchedError) {
console.log("inside catch");
// throw new Error("hmm");
} finally {
// always executed
console.log("inside finally");
}
// always executed
console.log("after try catch finally");
the finally statement can be useful when another error is thrown inside the catch block, in which case you have more serious problems in your codeYou have global opt out with browser settings, you can use never ask again on a per site basis and you can avoid returning to the annoying sites.
You can also disable JS entirely.
Because reasons ... First every CRUD app has specific differences in: the UI, authorization system, rules,
It is not taught enough in classic computer science classes (what I did) to reuse existing patterns/RAD/frameworks
Also it is to an extend automated: ui libraries, widgets, SQL/NOSQL, admin interfaces etc are existing and could be viewed, as automation.
it is possible to read comments on runtime in js and do things based on what you read with a while loop + if else
because A/B testing showed that using 40% of you screen increases the likelyhood to login/register by 20%
I made this recently: I post it here to gather feedback
How does this compete with putting a big script tag at the end of the body in the HTML that contains all the code necessary ? What settings can make this way of requiring scripts useful ?
I guess this can be useful, to load extra functionality at run time, in very big single page application.
What does it even mean. The event loop is only used when there is nothing going on. Is it faster at doing nothing ?
Good work, have you put it on PIP and Python Mailing list ?
Compressed version
We say that history is written by the winners. That is sometimes true. We have no Carthaginian accounts of their war with Rome; few historians today have much sympathy for Hitler. But the thread that seems to connect many of the great histories of the pre-modern world is that they were written by the losers.
Html