I think it depends on the team behind it, the models being used for the building, testing and verification.
HN user
EagleEdge
I am using my AI agents to optimize my agentic workflow. It is like "I am doing surgery on myself."
I am also trying to resist all those remote control, control from your phone, or run your agents from anywhere kind of "promotions". I feel like they are trying to make us addicted to AI agents. I set my work up before I go home in the evening and no more agent-checking until next morning.
Yes. It fundamentally changed how I read a book. I go back to it every once a while and always find new things to apply every time.
I always follow the rule in the book "How to Read a Book": give the book a superficial reading to decide if it is worth reading deeply and carefully.
Or, inventing a problem in order to justify a solution. I tried note taking system briefly in the past and I couldn't really find how it would help me in my personal life. I find spaced repetition system has a much wider application in that regard.
This sentence "And 15 years on I still wake up every day excited to keep working on it." stuck with me. Wow, that is true passion on what you do.
A new way of looking at a decision: It is something that a human spends attention on and that attention is scarce.
Author here. We study Moltbook's first-week snapshot (25k agents, 119k posts, 226k comments) and find that agent conversations follow a "fast response or silence" pattern — reply-kernel half-life is under one minute, 91% of comments never receive a direct reply, and threads are overwhelmingly star-shaped (mean max depth 1.38). A Reddit baseline analyzed with the same estimators shows substantially deeper threads and hour-scale persistence. We also test the widely discussed ~4-hour heartbeat hypothesis via spectral analysis but don't detect a significant aggregate periodic signal in this window. Code and data pipeline: https://github.com/AysajanE/moltbook-persistence