I've been wondering for a long time about when this more Bayesian approach would become available alongside an AI. Really excited to play around with this!
Is this kind of like a Karpathy 2nd brain for investing then?
HN user
I've been wondering for a long time about when this more Bayesian approach would become available alongside an AI. Really excited to play around with this!
Is this kind of like a Karpathy 2nd brain for investing then?
You'll have to pry the – from my cold, dead hands
Also wow no sticky topbar – wonder what that's all about
Oh wow verrrrrrrry polished. Very pink and purple. I dig it. VERY smooth animations.
Onlook (https://www.onlook.com/) | Founding Engineer (Fullstack / AI) | San Francisco or REMOTE (US) | Full-time
Onlook is an AI-native visual editor that lets designers, PMS, and engineers collaborate directly in the browser. We launched earlier this year, hit #1 on Hacker News, became the #1 trending repo on GitHub (above DeepSeek + Anthropic), and have grown to 22,000+ stars. We’re now hiring our first Founding Engineer.
We’re a design-led, product-obsessed team backed by YC, and we’re building a next-generation visual IDE used by tens of thousands of designers and engineers.
What we’re looking for:
• Full-stack engineer comfortable owning large, ambiguous problems
• Strong bias toward building fast and shipping often
• High craft, strong opinions, and willingness to defend them
• Desire to build an open-source product in public
• Someone who wants to help shape the culture, architecture, and direction from day one
Tech: Next.js, Tailwind, tRPC, Supabase, Drizzle, Bun, Docker, Anthropic, AI SDK.
What you’ll do: You’ll work across the stack, contribute to one of the fastest-growing OSS projects ever backed by YC, design and ship core parts of the visual editor, work with 100+ contributors, and help define the product with real users. If you’re in SF, we have a beautiful office near South Park.
How to stand out: Share something you’ve built. A project, repo, or portfolio tells us more than a resume.
Email me directly daniel@onlook.com or apply at https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/onlook/jobs/e4gHv1n-fo...
Very cool guys. Curious about a few things if you’re open to sharing:
- How are you handling tax/VAT and edge cases? Like usage backfills or retroactive credit grants, etc. etc.
- What’s the failure mode if your service is down?
Either way, refreshing to see someone go after this with the opinionated DX!
This is an ultra cool product - stoked someone is building this. We've internationalized our product using ChatGPT O-1 in the JSON files and it's been a real pain to try to decode the strings and otherwise for the text that is in the code.
Definitely going to ask my cofounder to look into implementing this.
- Are there other use cases for this tech besides language translation? Wondering if there are other eng problems that something like this could solve.
- Where are you guys thinking of taking this next? Seems like you're able to handle a lot of languages, so are you just continuing to refine the product or what's the plan for the next couple months and years?
Thanks for tackling this!
Was it too boring or what was disappointing about the result?
Sonnet 4 has been producing much more reliable outputs, but it's always a challenge to push it to get really creative. I think there are probably great ways we could be prompting for more creative output, but something we'll need to keep experimenting with for sure.
Super sick product!
Heyo we were running into rate-limits with Codesandbox, but we just upped the limit so try giving it another shot and let me know if it works!
The limit was just raised – Go ahead and try it again and let me know if it works!
We were running into rate-limit issues with Codesandbox. We just increased our limit, so go ahead and try it again and let me know if it works!
The limit was just raised – Go ahead and try it again and let me know if it works!
You've got us here all day haha
If you use our Desktop Product – https://onlook.com/download - you can import your projects there and use a lot more features like Layers, Components, Pages and more.
We don't have the ability for you to import existing repos for this beta product just yet, but it's something we'll be enabling in the coming weeks for sure.
Great feedback – we definitely should update our homepage content to have a more useful video that goes from 0 to 1 entirely.
Thanks for mentioning it!
We got rate-limited but are in contact with the team to get more sandboxes!
Hang-tight!
Thanks so much!
It's been a challenge to find the right balance for this – on one hand you want to give people who know what code is an easy way to navigate their codebases and be more effective, and on the other hand you want to help people who have never coded before create something they really love.
The visual layer has a lot of polish left to do to be a perfect design tool experience, but we're getting there.
I think for most designers they don't love being limited by traditional web "structures" like flexbox, but that's also how things can get built and scale properly. AI is very good at generating flexbox styled websites but when a designer jumps-in to an AI generated website it's like picking up a complex project someone else has architected. If you know how websites work it isn't super intimidating, but if you don't then it can feel very overwhelming.
One of the main reasons we decided to not have layers and styles immediately visible on the left and right sides of the app was because people who have never jumped into a design tool mentioned they were overwhelmed with the UI. Moving these tools into a "secondary" interaction layer cleared up the interface but made it easy for pro-users to still find them.
I'm excited to keep refining this editor experience so when you're able to import projects you have all of the tools you'd expect from a visual editor for your codebase.
I think there are some issues with the apply model – Kiet's working on a solution for it.
In the meantime, can you try asking Onlook again? I know it's inconveniant.
If nothing loads on the page, try clicking the text on the page, then prompting from the chat asking it to create a part or section of the website or thing you've prompted. Sometimes there's just a ton of code that gets rendered and doesn't apply, so shortening the length of the output manually with a smaller prompt may help.
Something we definitely need to fix though
Ah that's unfortunate – been having some issues with the rendered code being applied.
Can you try it again and see? Or, click on the page, then add your screenshot to the chat with your prompt.
Honestly doing 3D may be a bit tricky in Onlook but super curious to see if you get it to work. It works just like a normal browser would, but the complexity of knowing how to setup a 3D site like that may be too advanced for Onlook.
What issues are you running into? Does it take a while to load or where do you get stuck?
Hey HN! I'm Daniel, the other half of Onlook.
I'm super fired up about this new version of Onlook for two reasons:
1) It makes it so much easier to jump in and start designing and
2) We have a much more intuitive, simplified toolbar control for styles that makes it even easier to craft your designs.
This has been the third major version of Onlook, and each time has felt like a leap towards solving the gap between design and development. Our first product was a Chrome Extension, the second was a downloadable desktop app (Onlook Studio), and now we're releasing Onlook for Web.
For all of the designers and non-technical people that just need a way to share their ideas with their engineering colleagues, the beta of this web version is a great start. But our goal continues be to truly solve the gap, so we'll be adding tons of great features that will let you go beyond ideation to actual implementation on real codebases.
Some known bugs:
– Sometimes generations don't "apply" after they're loaded: Kiet is working on a fix for this, but try clicking on the blank-template and re-prompting your change.
- It can take a long time to load the AI chat: We're working on making this faster (or at least a little more entertaining).
- Sometimes nothing shows up in the chat: Try going back to the homepage and re-prompting. This is something we want to make smoother.
– Sometimes styles don't apply: Let us know! We're trying to catch the edge cases.
Thank you all for your help and patience as we work through this early preview. Please join us on our Discord [https://discord.gg/ZZzadNQtns] and report any bugs or issues on GitHub repo: https://github.com/onlook-dev/onlook
Nice!! Stoked for you guys to launch this. We've been looking to add-in MCP functionality into onlook and I feel like this could help.
wow this is AWESOME!! What was the hardest part of getting it set up? The ui is really nice and I love the scroll interaction. Didn't quite realize that you could filter it from the menu too until I played around with it for a while. Reminds me a lot of the Yahoo! News digest app from way back in the day but remade for modern UX.
This is cool – as an open source founder, I've wondered about how to keep things transparent while protecting people's privacy. What’s your general approach to public databases, and when does it make sense to make them public?
heyooo thanks naka!
You know it! Haha thanks for the support!
Thanks!
For monetization we'd like to keep the editor free for people to use and may monetize through add-on services like hosting. The way I like to think about it is that we may monetize on convenience points but keep things open-source so if you wanted to do things custom, then you can if you'd like.
On the video – thanks for the note there! We can certainly show it to do something more detailed as well than just a background color change. The good thing is that any designs done with Onlook still go through the usual code review process for any project, so hopefully people won't accept non-compliant design changes. In the event that they do, it'll be easier to fix things with Onlook.
On the lines of keeping things compliant with design systems, I'm excited about our ability to surface design tokens from a codebase, so users can always be sure they are selecting the right colors in the right scopes. That's something we still have yet to tackle, but have an open issue for:
Hey HN! I’m Daniel, the designer on Onlook.
Kiet and I started working together in January to try to solve the design / dev handoff, and we think that this is a great first step to getting more people into code. People have mentioned that Onlook is a great complement to building frontends with Cursor, so if you’re just learning to code with Cursor, try running your projects locally with Onlook.
One thing I’d like to do is open-source our design system and make it easier for designers to contribute. If you have any suggestions or examples of projects that have done this well, let me know!
I’m hopeful that with the help of so many great contributors, we can make an editor experience that doesn’t compromise on the design / code experience!
Heyo appreciate the kind words! I'm Daniel, Kiet's cofounder. The animation was a free component built by Nandi (https://twitter.com/learnframer) at LearnFramer. I can only pretend to be as creative as him – definitely check out his stuff.
I wonder if you open up this to also deconstruct color variables (-var) into their respective hex codes if you'd get more results of sites that use design systems.
Have you explored that much at all?
Cool project!