HN user
You can always build/compile your own software, having the local 'key' is the ability to do so. I'm not sure what else is implied - how will an external service / website enforce this?
Are you confusing whatever you mean by 'null transform' with an identity function?
The project isn't serious, why should I be?
What does "that README is for bots" mean? Are you implying it is some kind of special language written by and correctly understood by bots/LLMs, but otherwise semantically coherent?
And the comment text is what they typed into the text box. So just show us the same - the prompt.
Then.. why would you link to the readme if you know it's slop? What's the point of a slop README?
In the context of remote attestation, I think this is also even dangerous / evil.
It's cool until it becomes enforced and we no longer hold the keys to our own hardware; bwim the ability to determine which key signers are to be trusted. But I don't think standing in the way of attestation tech is a fruitful tactic - much better to fight for hardware/key control.
TBH llm generated text is usually better than this..
Looking at the Debian example: https://in-toto.io/docs/examples/debian/
Does Debian already provide signature on .deb files (that is, provide a manifest of their hashes and and sign each)? If so, you could potentially d/l the files from any source/mirror?
Whenever I put a whitepaper in notebooklm and ask it to create a presentation etc explaining the main points, it illustrates the obvious, easy to understand things in the brief, and misses (or oversimplifies) most of the hard technical parts..
Does Ireland have the cheapest cleanest power?
prompts such as “Hey” or “commit” sometimes triggered 30+ tool calls
I read that this is because it wastes time looking through past conversations and other context to figure one what you might want it to do - a less ambiguous prompt would be better.
That kind of support is what users expect.
Then they should also expect enshittification and rug-pulls when it's realised where motivation for that support comes from.
Must have hit some nerves.
What's with this response in the Twitter thread??:
"This ain't what a C&D looks like. Implies you don't actually have a leg to stand on. Upload a copy of your official legal demand (from a lawyer) or I'll forever see your company as one who attempts to bully the competition in public"
-- https://xcancel.com/jacobhartmannx/status/207012600834729596...
Is this just trolling?!
Technically, AI is code, just very complex code.
I'd say there are "simple" simple things you can do though, like take automated screenshots and detect colours for jarring colourschemes.
Then I assume you'll happily pay $20 for a bottle of water, given how important it is?
Yes, the "somehow" is that no one want to live there, and the associated expense of building there probably outweighs the benefits. I'm also sceptical you could establish a new sovereign state there.
The original post was "somewhere in Antarctic", what does that offer?
people tend to want low-latency and high-speed
that might change is privacy is an option. The real problem is the cost of building in the middle of nowhere, even if you use spare Starlink capacity, where do you get power & personnel from?
Are you a Perl dev?
Previous submissions:
I'm not sure what you mean by this.
What do you mean by ~"PoW unlocks unlimited scraping"?
Presumably he meant on Facebook, not on Facebook..
Maybe this is the guy they trained the LLMs on?
And an extra import. also, it sounds like they where looking specifically for knowledge of built-in operators.
Amplifiers, Not Substitutes
the kind of heading AI would write..
The PCB images are the, but sadly just images, no privet PCB layout format is provided.
Maybe a network of ppl who can vouch they meet in real life?
I don't know if having your name/ face a secret is still acceptable? Maybe tiers of devs (anon vs other) on that one?
Uh, no it isn't.