HN user

CSenn

39 karma
Posts15
Comments15
View on HN

Hi Everyone,

I am looking for feedback on a side project some friends and I have been working on.

First, do you see any value in being able to create, collaborate with access control, version, and diff data designs, and then output them to different formats? I have done some work in healthcare, energy, manufacturing, and e-commerce and in every one have seen json/xml schemas (or free text data specs) being passed around through emails, word docs, excel spreadsheets, hosted s3 files, power points, custom built websites, etc. I’ve also seen bugs when versions get confused between data partners or comments/changes get lost in email threads. It’s also not fun to read and maintain a 300-3,000 line data schema file.

Second, do you seen any value in being able to compose data designs? I personally think the idea of reusing data structures and composing data designs with a few clicks is interesting, but I’m curious to the practicality of it?

Also the json-ld graph output feels like it could be wrong? I am trying to avoid constraining properties using rdfs:domain as is common in RDF (since properties can be shared between designs and it creates a coupled export), however lib:children seems a little off?

Usually the number of nodes in the input and output layers don't affect things all that much. They are relatively set based on the problem. The number of nodes in the hidden layers, the number of hidden layers, and various other parameters such as cost and activation functions, are mostly what you use to tune performance.

That's a good point. I tried some light optimizations using ShouldComponentUpdate in React, but I believe the bottleneck is a synchronous blocking call in the D3 rendering process. Larger networks write up 25,000 SVG elements, and I was not sure how to significantly improve rendering speed. Someone suggested Canvas with D3 could speed rendering up?

You are talking about the startup like it is a commodity. Is it a brilliant game changing idea that could fundamentally revolutionize a space? Is it a To-Do list knock off? You should not do a start-up to do a start-up, you should do a startup because somewhere inside of you there is an outrageous, nearly undefinable force driving you to do it because you know the idea in some form or another must exist for the world to be as it should

Ok well it makes sense that she chose to start at the highest level and work her way down. And yes I was speaking about culture.

She was absolutely brilliant, probably somewhere up there in the top thinkers in history. But building a functional society is obviously exceptionally difficult, and the highest level arguments seem to me more of a thought game for academics then a practical solution to a pressing and absolutely real societal problem. I guess the reason I wrote the article is because at times misenterpretation of complex ideas can be dangerous. Maybe similar to how Germany's propaganda misinterpreted the teachings of Nietzsche.

And thanks for your input, it's helpful

Thanks for the tip with the typos, I wrote it with jade and need to use a spell checker. Very unprofessional.

andbrand is about letting people share how they feel about products in an extremely natural way. If you produce a quality product that people genuinely like, then andbrand should make you look extremely good. Other people will see your product through an organic search process, allowing you to market for free.

The point is I am not making an argument one way or the other. I am simply expressing how I have seen her views interpreted. Some people use her teachings as a foundation for how they make decisions, they have rationalized it is proper to act purely in self interest, and some of those times it is damn cold. And many extremely intelligent scholars have argued for many years about her teachings, writing is a way for me to traverse my mind to come to deeper understandings.

Ok that's fair, one question though because this was what I got out of the book. Do you believe the main big picture purpose of Ayn Rand's philosophy was to create the best possible society? I definitely may have over simplified her idea of selfishness, however the article was more about popular culture's interpretation of it, and maybe making a caricature of it is quite common.

"Stealing is ok" was just an example of how a rational truth can be flawed, it had nothing to do with Ayn Rand's teachings. My impression from Ayn Rand's teachings was that the best possible society was created when people acted in self interest, this is what I mean by the "greater good". In the novel the politicians always spoke about the greater good, but her argument was they were not doing it right, and actually destroying society. The purpose of the essay was about some people's interpretation of her ideas more then the ideas themselves, which is why I believe they have received such a cult following.