ArchTypical

im not going to create an email to anonymously notify the same site who will review a flagged comment anyway. So, to the process as described, no. I think the comment was timely and relevant, others just disagree about the utility.

There was one notable exception, and that was my experience with Triplebyte. They have a much better technical interview process than any I have seen anywhere else

This looks just like an Ad I see on reddit all over the place.

Of course this can be improved and simplified. Handling 12123123 err checks is a problem of avoiding short circuit failures. That's fine, but you have multiple return values, so there's no reason not to leverage that properly...or even consistently. The whole file is littered with waiting assignment until a comparison, except in some cases or where if and elseif statements use the return values inline but not other places. It's just random.

        //checkVolumeSatisfyClaim checks if the volume requested by the claim satisfies the requirements of the claim
        func checkVolumeSatisfyClaim(volume *v1.PersistentVolume, claim *v1.PersistentVolumeClaim) error {

            // check if PV's DeletionTimeStamp is set, if so, return error.
            if utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.StorageObjectInUseProtection) {
                if volume.ObjectMeta.DeletionTimestamp != nil {
                    return fmt.Errorf("the volume is marked for deletion")
                }
            }

            volumeSize := volume.Spec.Capacity[v1.ResourceStorage].Value()
            requestedSize := claim.Spec.Resources.Requests[v1.ResourceName(v1.ResourceStorage)].Value()

            if volumeSize < requestedSize {
                return fmt.Errorf("requested PV is too small")
            }elseif v1helper.GetPersistentVolumeClass(volume) != v1helper.GetPersistentVolumeClaimClass(claim) {
                return fmt.Errorf("storageClassName does not match")
            }

            // function here, obviously
            err = volumeAccessModeChecks(volume, claim)

            return err
        }
        // Here's the function
        func volumeAccessModeChecks(volume *v1.PersistentVolume, claim *v1.PersistentVolumeClaim) error {
            // even the naming sucks. DISTINCT case error name
            isMismatch, volumeModeErr := checkVolumeModeMismatches(&claim.Spec, &volume.Spec)

            if err != nil {
                return fmt.Errorf("error checking volumeMode: %v", volumeModeErr)
            }elseif isMismatch {
                return fmt.Errorf("incompatible volumeMode")
            }elseif !checkAccessModes(claim, volume) {
                return fmt.Errorf("incompatible accessMode")
            }
            return nil
        }

I don't care who his friends are. I don't find people interesting because of the company they keep or track their career because they interviewed someone. Galafinakis isn't worth fawning over because he mock-interviewed Obama. Baskets wasn't interesting either.

Any guy quitting facebook (who can sign up again for free in a heartbeat, it's zero risk) is an event, granted. Might as well talk about the time someone quit selling on eBay or had a video removed by Youtube or went to Ohio. It doesn't mean anything until you sensationalize it. This indicates that it is not news, but raw sensationalism.

That is fascinating.

It's just as bad as C/C++ allowing clobbering over memory.

That's a good parallel.

My point was he's using inexperience and/or familiarity with C/C++ as a reason to "hate" it.

I have less familiarity with C/C++ than Python and I hate it because it's not about language perspective. It's bad language design, for such a high level language. Inclusion wrapped with execution is unsafe and has an easy fix for most language interpreters. Don't allow execution during a declaration. If you want to do metaprogramming, there are other ways that don't break the paradigm (rewriting files before inclusion, chaining programs, etc).

author is admitting he's unhappy because Python isn't C

That's not the point at all. I mean, did you read it?

How do you mischaracterize the specific point about the casual opportunity for foreign module metaprogamming? Module initialization is bad in a pernicious way. While you can't do operator overloading, you can clobber namespaces (which was referenced). Paired with a community repository, this is exactly the same case of what's so dangerous about npm.

Your link does not support your belief that it is in some way partially correct.

Not my belief. I have evidence, so it's what I know, since previously I did not know. I found your arguments compelling and looked it up.

In case you missed in the post you are replying to:

Nope. You decided to ignore a statement you agreed with for another you wanted to attack.

The largest pro life groups (as a body made up of pie slices) does evidently (ie have evidence) that supports:

they are not just anti abortion, they are also anti birth control

Which is what was being referenced by at least a partial correctness, since it was a following statement. Not sure who you're trying to fool.

Yes? The four humors theory of health and medicine was based on reason and logic. It was also wrong

Wrong is a matter of evidence. For the time, it was right as right can be. That's how science works and is in accordance with rationality. Proving a theorem, does not mean that bringing it up as a theorem was/is wrong. Over time, changes in knowledge are part of the process.

Good luck with your religious convictions to these issues.

RFCs are often useful guidelines, but don't get too hung up on them. There are always side effects. eg resource usage, interaction effects (cache priming), etc.

[Edit:] > The point is that GET is not supposed to change the information stored on the server side.

The RFCs for HTTP USAGE are guidelines that are less about utility and more of an interoperability dream that was never realized. There's nothing sancrosanct about them. There have been DECADES of usage contrary (eg medical, gamedev, advertising, ERP, etc). At some point people realize it's bikeshedding issue that's more trouble than it's worth.

The liberal understanding of this is not entirely wrong Yes, it is.

No, it's not ENTIRELY wrong.

https://www.quora.com/Does-the-pro-life-movement-consider-co...

It isn't irrational. Being wrong is not the same as being irrational.

Rational: based on or in accordance with reason or logic.

Your argumentative tone is not compelling and you fail to demonstrate your position within some very constrained topics. Perhaps you will reconsider some of these ideas.

Already more interesting than the whole clickbait blogspam i just reread (to make sure i didnt miss something the first time).

Trump is probably going to lose the trade war over Iran

Who cares what "Trump" loses? This is about the USA and Trump will be long gone before any of these situations are measured. The USA is not starting a trade war with Iran (first time I've ever heard sanctions called a trade war), the US is enacting sanctions to hurt Iran without scaring allies like Saudi Arabia.

China holds far more US debt than Americans hold Chinese debt

That's intentional and good for the US. If you don't understand this, I really think you need to understand why we sell it to foreign powers at all.

China has far more market reach into emerging markets in Africa

That's a real problem which the USA is losing out on potentially. It won't be apparent for some time, since people who are industrialized enough to get out of self-oppressive warlord control will not handle foreign occupation very well either. The US answer is always to enable the counter-revolutionaries anyway until the US has someone they want to deal with.

China seems to be focussing on renewables rather than falling back on coal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_China

China adds renewables as they expand their population, where it makes economic sense.

Unfortunately (for most), this is not a change from the existing course: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45640706

At least they are getting out of nuclear, so yay? I think it's just backpedaling due to the low standards and high operational risk of many Chinese industries.

a serious matter only need 3 days of hearing from 30 witnesses.

Making statements about immoral acts by the Chinese government is probably something that takes a little bit of secrecy, security and assurances in the modern era. I have to wonder if you understand the situation.

The word "substantial" is very vague and a bad sign for any scientific and evidence-based publication.

That's true. Have an upvote. There are some troubling stats that can be pulled up in regard to transplant stats:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Go...

Admittedly, it's a little backhanded to complain about the accuracy of statistics that are intentionally withheld by a totalitarian dystopian regime.

Downvoted, but relevant all the same: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18611084

People don't usually sell their homes to cash in.

The real gambling was 10 years ago. Having had a few relatives try (and fail, in Vegas) to do just this, I'll have to disagree. Watched about $45k in downpayments+fees in each case evaporate as well as the credit scores as they defaulted.

Even on HN, you're going to use the intentionally politicized value (people still tracked on unemployment, contractors sometimes, etc): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

instead of something close to the actual? https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53452

I don't understand how people are still this lazy.

They supply virtually every aspect of the temporary-cities that are U.S. wartime bases. Without them, we can't have these wars.

I don't believe this at all. We don't need these 'green zones' to run a war, as the US has done many times before. We did need them to run a specific kind of war, which was a blitzkrieg occupation. Not saying it was a bad plan, it certainly achieved some measure of success, but pretending that it's the only way to engage in war is unwise.

doubled-down on his idiocy

Ironic, given the topic of seeking the afforded freedoms...even if it's idiotic.

Not even remotely comparable situations.

Pretty close, especially since what you have successfully done. I mean it's not the end of the career for anyone Google fires, so that's hyperbole, granted. It's comparable because you baked it down to a phrase in both cases, which describes behavior that runs contrary to Google's interests (in one way or another).

American prosperity is as much an outcome of capitalism as poverty, repression, and murders in Central America are.

ANY sort of inherent human greed capitalizes on suffering. It doesn't magically disappear with another system. There is always a pareto distribution of wealth. The differences are in which metrics are the primary leverage for accumulation and the scale of the differentials (wealth disparity) along the curve.

implementation of an upload button

Design team makes a mock that is styled and placed correctly, including moving around exiting elements in the page.

a datastore to store the uploaded values

Just 1 datastore? More like:

+ a frontend service to get/put and validate the data is in the right format with sizing

+ a backend storage service (hardened because we don't know what's in the document) for get/put with sizing and validation

optionally - an integration into a legacy feeds system to get the spreadsheet's data to all of the places it needs to go

Ensure Legal, ADA, FDA, whatever compliant.

Document EVERY decision along the way and coordinate.

3 weeks looks a little hight to me, but things tend to go awry with so many moving parts.

It's a jobs and pension program for appointees There was never an affordable model for building HSR

If someone isn't aware of how these free money contracts were awarded, they really don't understand the depth of the fantasy ...which Jerry Brown is almost single-handedly responsible for.

The state cannot even manage Caltrain well

Yup. There are trains that go from San Diego up to San Fran, with transfers, mostly along the coast. It's so expensive to ride with EXISTING rail that it's running on subsidy.

Some of the comments on these multi-billion dollar scams are ridiculously positive for no apparent reason.

There's no denial, as much as it is what you would ironically believe. There is likely intellectual dishonesty, which was my point.

Well said.

I lump climate change deniers into the same category as flat-earthers

there are no inconsistencies in my testimonies against the government, against the fossil fuel industry

I lump climate change blamers into the same category. The moment you start talking about individual country (or any specific body) per capita and cumulative, you're making a political statements that someone is responsible and needs to be accountable because of their history (back to the 1750s in this one). ie These people are bad because there's metrics that fit my message and all other people are good because they have different metrics.

Seriously, how is the regional political accounting relevant to the objective analysis of what the correlation, causation and projections are?

I guess the idea is something like: "you're historically the worst (even if you're not the worst today) and you have resources, so it's up to you to try to fix it but we're not gonna even suggest how, but just sayin'". It reads like a lack of confidence in their own conclusions.

There's nothing "alternative" about your position. There are 3 good faith positions phrased in a casual manner which make no assumptions (except there is a caveat about the effect to users only).

I disagree, this is not harmful to these users, because ___

(I have a) radically different value system than you

There, you chose one.

Oh, I see: you probably didn't know that CSV formats is also means character separated values, and can actually use non-printing ASCII characters as delimiters.

That seems unnecessarily condescending. JSON can also mean Janky Serialized Object Notation, but that's not the common case.

I guess your experience with character separated value files is very limited.

In practice, using something other than a comma is a good solution for some problems, but not others (eg transfer corruption or you know, the OP's use case).

a heavyweight solution like JSON.

I've literally never heard that phrase, nor does it make much sense. At best it's 2 more characters for wrapping braces with existing quoted data/numbers and at worst you have to make up a new non-interchangeable format as you run into exceptions from the diff, which can affect past encodings. Sounds more involved than using JSON. shrug

I imagine most of them that need a store (i.e. not consoles, so basically PCs) already have Steam, and at least one game in it

125 million fortnite installs - https://www.businessinsider.com/fortnite-size-statistics-pla...

70+ million steam installs - https://galyonk.in/steam-in-2017-129c0e6be260

Not saying what's right and what's wrong but I heard these kind of numbers reported after the announcement. I see a lot of different numbers being thrown around and I'm not sure what to believe anymore.

Steamcharts consistently surprises me at how few people play the popular games I like, so I'm beginning to think Steam isn't as big.

that they're underpaid or overworked or whatever

Having family in healthcare and being a lifelong patient due to a congenital defect, a job in software (including management obv) is a breeze compared to health care worker jobs across the board. They require more "schooling" (via mind-numbing training), are underpaid, have much more serious consequences from mistakes, have less oversight, work longer hours and under worse conditions. It's disheartening.

Category theory doesn't require NULL but physical state does. Given the state of the machine as a constraint, there must be an uninitialized state of unknown or undefined (but allocated) for each type to ensure types are run as functors. I don't see why talking about the theory is useful, given the practical constraint will always provide an asterisk of *given you're working on physical memory

All types are functors in practice...which always has an element of initialization to ensure the type is defined in the memory.