HN user
Web Developer
What exactly makes a text a hyperlink?
Does it have to be only the usual <a href="#">text</a> ?
What if I do this: <div link="#">text</div>
And then I use JavaScript to redirect, is it still considered a hyperlink?
Have I just found a loop hole? :)
I was actually watching him do that and I was thinking the same thing. I don't know anything about developing but I was thinking that if the casing has even a tiny crack then the camera flash would ruin at least one photo. The nice thing to do would be to send him a friendly email and tell him about it. Maybe he just doesn't realize it.
Really nice work. I love that the HD button stays active and loads all videos in HD. I also like the arrows shortcuts for next and previous video. Makes it much easier to skip tracks.
One minor recommendation: when the video is in full screen, the full screen arrows from the icon should be pointed inwards. Just being picky :)
Great Youtube implementation. Congrats.
Too bad the actual search results are not relevant at all. I tried searching for something and I switched back to Google in the end.
In case anyone is wondering what the hell this is:
The cache version saved by Google shows a single post in the tumblr blog. That post is with an image of a girl and you are asked to pay $3 to get a text file with the link to the girl's facebook page. Clearly spam.
The girl's facebook page is here: https://www.facebook.com/zlata.stefanova/photos (direct link to the photos because I know that is where you want to go :) (no, I did not pay $3, I just used google images)
You want $20 for a product this ugly and with no demo? No freaking way.
Instead of wasting your time creating petitions to keep Google Reader open, I suggest you make a petition to make Google Reader open source. Google is going to close Reader either way so at least we'd haven a self hosted good alternative.
Every alternative I've seen so far in this hole topic(yes, all of them, I've tested all of them) is either poorly designed, bad UX, weird browser problems or trying too hard to be more then a RSS reader. Guess I'll just have to spend 2 days and build my own. Oh, well :)
Even if they aren't in the US, the majority of hosts will still accept DMCAs.
I've actually had normal emails get returned to me because Gmail thought they wore spam. Crazy. Thanks for the feedback.
It seems a bit harsh. The seller has no control over the chargebacks and you actually 'punish' the seller for them and not the buyer. Digital files chargebacks are more common than you think. How do you decide if the chargeback should receive a strike in the even that the buyer simple doesn't answer any contact requests(happened to me more then once). I've also had buyers lie about the purchase when in fact I had IP and email proof that they wore actually the ones buying but the chargeback was submitted(and approved) because they said they wore not the ones who made the transaction. Is anyone else using this 3 strike rule?
Yes, but we have no idea how the old site was. A blog post explaining everything would have been more appropriate.
Whooo, easy. I'm not arguing with anyone. Yes, I could be wrong. But what will happen if an alternative to Bitcoin shows-up. Or 10. Won't that bring the price down? You have to admit, this "freedom" is kind of hard to control at the moment and it's moodier then a women. It crashed before and it can happen again. I'm not against or for it at the moment(maybe slightly the second), I'm just waiting to see what will happen.
It wasn't meant to be misleading. It was meant to be funny. There was another post here about how Bitcoins went down $10. By the time I saw the post it already went back up. So... yeah, I just posted it more as a response to that other post.
Of course it's a bubble. But like all bubbles, some people will profit greatly if they know when to get out of it. It's a gamble.
No one mentioned about the URL. Ok, I'll mention it :)
I posted this just because I found it very funny that the price went down and then up and people started already writing about it. Maybe I'm the only one seeing the humor in it.
That's nice and all, but a 60 Watt bulb is still not bright enough for my taste. I have never used old 60W bulbs exactly for this reason. I always feel like I'm struggling to see things with those bulbs.
This is why you shouldn't use GeoCities or MySpace. </sarcasm> Just because a single website is shutting down doesn't mean you should spend extra time installing stuff on your own. I disagree with the article.
I always save my bookmarks in Firefox. To make sure I don't lose them next time I reinstall Windows I use an add-on called FEBE that backs-up all my bookmarks(among other things) into a directory. Next time I have a vanilla Firefox I reinstall FEBE and import all my bookmarks. I really don't need to spend the extra time to go see another website. Another trick I use is to delete the bookmark name and only leave the favicon to showup. It saves space and I'm only one click away from my favorite website.
If you tried other services and returned to Chrome then it seems you're looking for a specific feature and you're not finding it, but you also didn't tell us what it is.
Just use Chrome and try to categorize your bookmarks as best you can.
Here is a simple(and a bit ugly) website that lets you bookmark sites. I don't use it but I recommended it before and some people seemed to like it: http://fav20.ro/