Ok, I hear you :). I share similar sentiments myself.
HN user
8bitsout
I'm curious how the value of your website would be determined in your model of the future and why an AI (at least one of the cloud provider models) wouldn't just persist your data after accessing it once. In other words, the way I am understanding it is that your data has a package value. An AI, if it wanted to access the entire contents, pays the whole package value. And every time it does this, you get paid. So, to really benefit, your data needs some sort of minimum value that is accessed at an appropriate frequency.
Also, in this model Cloudflare basically becomes the centralized gate keeper of you getting paid. And to me, this kind of sucks. It's not a very productive line of thought on my end -- I could see something like this happening as the internet trends toward centralization over time -- but it just feels bad.
My mind sort of shuts off once I recognize something is written by AI. It's really hard to try and force myself to keep reading. Even if a piece of writing walks the line of being written by a human or AI, my mind will want to disengage.
Is it possible for you to provide examples? What were you trying to solve? What was your solution and why was GPT's solution superior and faster?
I'm going to go insane from all of this
Thanks for sharing :)
That's a pretty neat idea. What does "map technical debt, agent readiness, code complexity" look like? How does that get done?
I'm working on my self-host TTS cli application for turning articles into spoken audio which I can stream from my PC to mobile device when I'm out and about.
It's called Vocast: https://github.com/cnrmurphy/vocast
Thinking about adding some things like queuing RSS feed items to be converted to audio and a feature for being able to do the conversion from my phone.
I think that this is common knowledge in market microstructure, but I've read about this specific relationship between market makers and adverse selection in the book, "Trades, Quotes and Prices".