HN user

56k

635 karma
Posts28
Comments38
View on HN
tech.metriccollective.com 9y ago

Of Course I’ll Let You Execute Arbitrary JavaScript Code in My Users’ Browsers

56k
7pts0
xorshift.di.unimi.it 10y ago

Fastest full-period generator passing BigCrush without systematic failures

56k
4pts0
ideone.com 10y ago

Snippet that causes g++ to hang and use gigabytes of ram

56k
3pts0
github.com 10y ago

HEAD: A list of everything that goes in the head element of your document

56k
2pts1
meta.stackexchange.com 10y ago

Stack Overflow TOS – prohibited for users to scrape dev profiles to spam them

56k
7pts1
jelleraaijmakers.nl 10y ago

Dissecting a spammer's spam script

56k
3pts0
hjson.org 10y ago

Hjson, the Human JSON

56k
257pts213
www.madetech.com 10y ago

7 Problems to Avoid When Building a Software Team

56k
1pts0
law.stackexchange.com 10y ago

Can open source programmers be sued if their programs use encryption?

56k
7pts0
web.archive.org 10y ago

Why hasn't functional programming taken over yet?

56k
37pts80
nodejs.org 10y ago

Node 5.7.0 (stable) released

56k
161pts46
arc.applause.com 10y ago

JavaScript Dominates as the No. 1 Most Used Programming Language

56k
4pts0
motherboard.vice.com 10y ago

Judge Rules FBI Must Reveal Malware It Used to Hack Over 1,000 Computers

56k
234pts77
ovh.com 10y ago

OVH down

56k
20pts20
www.youtube.com 10y ago

The computer that mastered Go

56k
4pts0
blog.bitbucket.org 10y ago

Bitbucket finally has repository groups

56k
4pts0
vexxhost.com 10y ago

How to Install GitLab as Your Private GitHub Clone

56k
3pts1
www.theguardian.com 10y ago

‘Trident is old technology’: the brave new world of cyber warfare

56k
3pts0
www.youtube.com 10y ago

HOW IT WORKS: The International Space Station (1080p, 60fps)

56k
2pts0
foorious.com 10y ago

JavaScript oddities

56k
2pts0
www.theregister.co.uk 10y ago

Intel admits Skylakes can ... ... ... freeze in the middle of work

56k
15pts4
foorious.com 10y ago

My work/life balance is all unbalanced

56k
2pts0
utcc.utoronto.ca 10y ago

Updating software to IPv6 is often harder than you might think

56k
5pts0
mashable.com 10y ago

Facebook, Apple, Netflix and Google worrying about the stock market

56k
4pts0
www.di.unipi.it 10y ago

Perversions, Cults and Fetishes of the Information Age

56k
3pts0
www.synapsenews.com 10y ago

Smartflix lets you watch the global Netflix catalog

56k
2pts0
foorious.com 10y ago

Working on weekends

56k
3pts0
medium.com 10y ago

Rendering Realtime Caustics in WebGL

56k
10pts0

Mmm... If they called it "third-party router penalty" you wouldn't be wasting all this time with this.

Obviously they want to make extra money on top of what you pay for the internet. That comes in form of renting you a router or getting the money anyway with a fee.

The naming is wrong. It shouldn't be called "maintenance fee", but it doesn't look like there's anything you can do.

You need to have your own IDs IMHO, so that people can associate multiple accounts (ex., both Facebook and Twitter). Could you go with something simple, like a timestamp with microseconds or a timestamp plus a random number?

If you don't want to allow that, why not just to fb_{facebook_id, tw_{twitter_id}, etc.?

I've seen it on a lot of websites.

It's better if you don't remember which email you used to signup, as it validates it right away without you having to enter the password, so you can make multiple attempts more quickly.

It somewhat looks better because after you've entered your email they can show your profile picture.

On Chrome at least, autocomplete still works, so you don't have to enter your password manually if you have it saved. I don't know if other browsers (or even Chrome on certain websites) might get confused if username and passwords aren't together.

It makes it seem easier to login. Having to fill 1 field twice feels better than having to fill 2 fields once (in my opinion, at least).

This article doesn't make any sense.

The use of metaphors worked when people didn't know what a computer was, and the only way to make its UI make sense was to mimic real-world objects. Now, this is no longer necessary. It's been 40 years.

While I agree that new macOS icons aren't great (see the Game Center icon), the old ones were silly. I'm 35 and I have probably seen an actual contact book only once when I was little. It doesn't make sense to have a skeuomorphic contact book as an icon for Contacts. The old icon for Pages? I don't even know what that is, I'm not into calligraphy.

The only thing I'd agree with is hiding UI controls. Apple has been making its apps less usable to make them look pretty, hiding important elements in an attempt to declutter the interface. I hate how Safari hides the full address in the address bar, for instance. Or, how they removed scrollbars and force people to actually scroll every piece of the interface to check if there's something more to see, while before you could tell just by looking at scrollbars. Of course, there are settings to go back to the old behavior for both my examples, so power users are fine, but I fail to see how these moves improve things for regular users.

I also disagree that Steve Job's death was detrimental to macOS's UI. He was the one who kept Apple looking outdated with his obsession for skeuomorphism, I'm glad they went for a flatter look right after his death.

Of course, everyone's taste is different, but I still think this is a bad article.